Judging with Personality and Confidence: A Study on Personality-Conditioned LLM Relevance Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01862v1
• Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 07:46:29 GMT
• Title: Judging with Personality and Confidence: A Study on Personality-Conditioned LLM Relevance Assessment
• Authors: Nuo Chen, Hanpei Fang, Piaohong Wang, Jiqun Liu, Tetsuya Sakai, Xiao-Ming Wu,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can simulate specific personality traits and produce behaviors that align with those traits.<n>Few studies have examined how simulated personalities impact confidence calibration, specifically the tendencies toward overconfidence or underconfidence.<n>We show that personalities such as low agreeableness consistently align more closely with human labels than the unprompted condition.
• Score: 27.57574817687014
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent studies have shown that prompting can enable large language models (LLMs) to simulate specific personality traits and produce behaviors that align with those traits. However, there is limited understanding of how these simulated personalities influence critical web search decisions, specifically relevance assessment. Moreover, few studies have examined how simulated personalities impact confidence calibration, specifically the tendencies toward overconfidence or underconfidence. This gap exists even though psychological literature suggests these biases are trait-specific, often linking high extraversion to overconfidence and high neuroticism to underconfidence. To address this gap, we conducted a comprehensive study evaluating multiple LLMs, including commercial models and open-source models, prompted to simulate Big Five personality traits. We tested these models across three test collections (TREC DL 2019, TREC DL 2020, and LLMJudge), collecting two key outputs for each query-document pair: a relevance judgment and a self-reported confidence score. The findings show that personalities such as low agreeableness consistently align more closely with human labels than the unprompted condition. Additionally, low conscientiousness performs well in balancing the suppression of both overconfidence and underconfidence. We also observe that relevance scores and confidence distributions vary systematically across different personalities. Based on the above findings, we incorporate personality-conditioned scores and confidence as features in a random forest classifier. This approach achieves performance that surpasses the best single-personality condition on a new dataset (TREC DL 2021), even with limited training data. These findings highlight that personality-derived confidence offers a complementary predictive signal, paving the way for more reliable and human-aligned LLM evaluators.

Related papers

• Confidence Estimation for LLMs in Multi-turn Interactions [48.081802290688394]
  This work presents the first systematic study of confidence estimation in multi-turn interactions.<n>We establish a formal evaluation framework grounded in two key desideratas: per-turn calibration and monotonicity of confidence.<n>Our work provides a foundational methodology for developing more reliable and trustworthy conversational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T14:58:04Z)
• Metacognitive Sensitivity for Test-Time Dynamic Model Selection [0.0]
  We propose a new framework for evaluating and leveraging AI metacognition.<n>We introduce meta-d', a psychologically-grounded measure of metacognitive sensitivity, to characterise how reliably a model's confidence predicts its own accuracy.<n>We then use this dynamic sensitivity score as context for a bandit-based arbiter that performs test-time model selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T09:15:05Z)
• BrowseConf: Confidence-Guided Test-Time Scaling for Web Agents [58.05949210993854]
  We investigate whether search agents have the ability to communicate their own confidence through verbalized confidence scores after long sequences of actions.<n>We propose Test-Time Scaling (TTS) methods that use confidence scores to determine answer quality, encourage the model to try again until reaching a satisfactory confidence level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T15:58:51Z)
• The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs [60.15472325639723]
  Personality traits have long been studied as predictors of human behavior.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) suggest similar patterns may emerge in artificial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T21:27:10Z)
• Evaluating the Simulation of Human Personality-Driven Susceptibility to Misinformation with LLMs [0.18416014644193066]
  Large language models (LLMs) make it possible to generate synthetic behavioural data at scale.<n>We evaluate the capacity of LLM agents, conditioned on Big-Five profiles, to reproduce personality-based variation in susceptibility to misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T08:16:07Z)
• Do Language Models Mirror Human Confidence? Exploring Psychological Insights to Address Overconfidence in LLMs [16.635844645949636]
  We show that models exhibit subtle differences from human patterns of overconfidence when prompted to answer based on different personas.<n>We propose Answer-Free Confidence Estimation to improve confidence calibration and LLM interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T14:37:18Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics [59.821829073478376]
  This paper offers a comprehensive benchmark for quantifying psychological constructs of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our work identifies five key psychological constructs -- personality, values, emotional intelligence, theory of mind, and self-efficacy -- assessed through a suite of 13 datasets.<n>We uncover significant discrepancies between LLMs' self-reported traits and their response patterns in real-world scenarios, revealing complexities in their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z)
• Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometrics [29.325576963215163]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their adaptation in various domains as conversational agents.<n>We introduce TRAIT, a new benchmark consisting of 8K multi-choice questions designed to assess the personality of LLMs.<n>LLMs exhibit distinct and consistent personality, which is highly influenced by their training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T19:50:56Z)
• LLMvsSmall Model? Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model [58.887561071010985]
  Personality detection aims to detect one's personality traits underlying in social media posts. Most existing methods learn post features directly by fine-tuning the pre-trained language models. We propose a large language model (LLM) based text augmentation enhanced personality detection model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T12:10:18Z)
• PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection [50.66968526809069]
  We propose a novel personality detection method, called PsyCoT, which mimics the way individuals complete psychological questionnaires in a multi-turn dialogue manner. Our experiments demonstrate that PsyCoT significantly improves the performance and robustness of GPT-3.5 in personality detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T08:23:33Z)
• Revisiting the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models [62.57981196992073]
  This study aims to determine the reliability of applying personality assessments to Large Language Models. Analysis of 2,500 settings per model, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini-Pro, and LLaMA-3.1, reveals that various LLMs show consistency in responses to the Big Five Inventory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T15:03:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.