Trust in LLM-controlled Robotics: a Survey of Security Threats, Defenses and Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02377v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 02:07:33 GMT
• Title: Trust in LLM-controlled Robotics: a Survey of Security Threats, Defenses and Challenges
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized their ability to interpret complex human commands and execute sophisticated tasks.<n>Such paradigm shift introduces critical security vulnerabilities stemming from the ''embodiment gap''<n>We present a systematic survey, summarizing the emerging threat landscape and corresponding defense strategies for LLM-controlled robotics.
• Score: 31.289512037053246
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into robotics has revolutionized their ability to interpret complex human commands and execute sophisticated tasks. However, such paradigm shift introduces critical security vulnerabilities stemming from the ''embodiment gap'', a discord between the LLM's abstract reasoning and the physical, context-dependent nature of robotics. While security for text-based LLMs is an active area of research, existing solutions are often insufficient to address the unique threats for the embodied robotic agents, where malicious outputs manifest not merely as harmful text but as dangerous physical actions. In this work, we present a systematic survey, summarizing the emerging threat landscape and corresponding defense strategies for LLM-controlled robotics. Specifically, we discuss a comprehensive taxonomy of attack vectors, covering topics such as jailbreaking, backdoor attacks, and multi-modal prompt injection. In response, we analyze and categorize a range of defense mechanisms, from formal safety specifications and runtime enforcement to multi-LLM oversight and prompt hardening. Furthermore, we review key datasets and benchmarks used to evaluate the robustness of these embodied systems. By synthesizing current research, this work highlights the urgent need for context-aware security solutions and provides a foundational roadmap for the development of safe, secure, and reliable LLM-controlled robotics.

Related papers

• Toward Secure AI-Powered Penetration Testing Agents: Security Threats, Guardrails, and Architectural Perspectives [0.0]
  LLM-powered autonomous agents are transforming the penetration testing space with dynamic, multi-step offensive security.<n>But the ability to have persistent memory, to take actions in the real world, and to do long-horizon reasoning raises qualitatively different security concerns.<n>Existing guardrail mechanisms for conversational AI may not be sufficient to secure autonomous AI pentesting agents accordingly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T06:19:50Z)
• Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability [65.56750741053266]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed misinformation from a content-centric problem into a broader ecosystem-level security challenge.<n>In this paper, we introduce a role-layer framework to unify these risks and defenses.<n>The role characterizes LLMs as attackers, defenders, and vulnerable components of verification systems, while the layer dimension covers content, social contexts, evidence environments, and verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T17:04:17Z)
• Vision-Language-Action Safety: Threats, Challenges, Evaluations, and Mechanisms [61.29786895012393]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are emerging as a unified substrate for embodied intelligence.<n>This survey provides a unified and up-to-date overview of safety in Vision-Language-Action models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T15:58:19Z)
• Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses [168.50301366360344]
  Embodied Artificial Intelligence (Embodied AI) integrates perception, cognition, planning, and interaction into agents that operate in safety-critical environments.<n>Unlike digital AI systems, embodied agents must act under uncertain sensing, incomplete knowledge, and dynamic human-robot interactions.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of safety research in embodied AI, examining attacks and defenses across the full embodied pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T13:21:44Z)
• LLM Scalability Risk for Agentic-AI and Model Supply Chain Security [1.1205855201611814]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) & Generative AI are transforming cybersecurity, enabling both advanced defenses and new attacks.<n>This paper presents a unified analysis integrating offensive and defensive perspectives on GenAI-driven cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T03:20:49Z)
• NeuroBreak: Unveil Internal Jailbreak Mechanisms in Large Language Models [68.09675063543402]
  NeuroBreak is a top-down jailbreak analysis system designed to analyze neuron-level safety mechanisms and mitigate vulnerabilities.<n>By incorporating layer-wise representation probing analysis, NeuroBreak offers a novel perspective on the model's decision-making process.<n>We conduct quantitative evaluations and case studies to verify the effectiveness of our system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T08:12:06Z)
• Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics [68.36528819227641]
  This paper systematically evaluates the robustness of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models.<n>We introduce two untargeted attack objectives that leverage spatial foundations to destabilize robotic actions, and a targeted attack objective that manipulates the robotic trajectory.<n>We design an adversarial patch generation approach that places a small, colorful patch within the camera's view, effectively executing the attack in both digital and physical environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T01:52:20Z)
• Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones. Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored. We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z)
• Jailbreaking and Mitigation of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models [8.345554966569479]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed artificial intelligence by advancing natural language understanding and generation.<n>Despite these advancements, LLMs have shown considerable vulnerabilities, particularly to prompt injection and jailbreaking attacks.<n>This review analyzes the state of research on these vulnerabilities and presents available defense strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T00:00:56Z)
• A Study on Prompt Injection Attack Against LLM-Integrated Mobile Robotic Systems [4.71242457111104]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can process multi-modal prompts, enabling them to generate more context-aware responses. One of the primary concerns is the potential security risks associated with using LLMs in robotic navigation tasks. This study investigates the impact of prompt injections on mobile robot performance in LLM-integrated systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T02:48:22Z)
• garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Models [16.305837349514505]
  garak is a framework which can be used to discover and identify vulnerabilities in a target Large Language Models (LLMs) The outputs of the framework describe a target model's weaknesses, contribute to an informed discussion of what composes vulnerabilities in unique contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T18:18:43Z)
• On the Vulnerability of LLM/VLM-Controlled Robotics [54.57914943017522]
  We highlight vulnerabilities in robotic systems integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) due to input modality sensitivities.<n>Our results show that simple input perturbations reduce task execution success rates by 22.2% and 14.6% in two representative LLM/VLM-controlled robotic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T22:01:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.