Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10402v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 17:04:17 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models in Misinformation Ecosystems: Misuse, Defense, and Vulnerability
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have transformed misinformation from a content-centric problem into a broader ecosystem-level security challenge.<n>In this paper, we introduce a role-layer framework to unify these risks and defenses.<n>The role characterizes LLMs as attackers, defenders, and vulnerable components of verification systems, while the layer dimension covers content, social contexts, evidence environments, and verification.
• Score: 65.56750741053266
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have transformed misinformation from a primarily content-centric problem into a broader ecosystem-level security challenge. When misused, LLMs create risks beyond false content generation, enabling attacks on the social contexts, evidence sources, retrieval corpora, and verification workflows that misinformation defense depends on. In this paper, we introduce a role-layer framework to unify these risks and defenses. The role dimension characterizes LLMs as attackers, defenders, and vulnerable components of verification systems, while the layer dimension covers content, social contexts, evidence environments, and verification workflows. Guided by this framework, we organize LLM-enabled attacks, investigate LLM-based detection and verification methods, analyze vulnerabilities in LLM-centric detection paradigms, and discuss existing countermeasures against LLM-enabled attacks. Building on this synthesis, we identify three key open challenges: moving from static detection accuracy to budgeted ecosystem-level risk evaluation, hardening LLM-centered verification pipelines against adversarial manipulation, and deploying auditable human-in-the-loop verification systems for trustworthy real-world misinformation defense.

Related papers

• Steering LLM Viewpoints through Fabricated Evidence Injection [61.22850755490993]
  We introduce a two-phase attack framework that first repackages misleading statements with fabricated rationales, then instruct target LLMs to incorporate these viewpoints when responding to relevant queries.<n>Experiments on BBQ, ToxiGen, and our specialized dataset reveal that commercial LLMs without external safety classifiers remain highly vulnerable.<n>Building on this, we explore multiple defense strategies, among which a tailored safety policy enablesgpt-oss-safeguard to achieve 81% detection rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T14:48:23Z)
• Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatment [0.5801044612920815]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into safety-critical systems.<n>This work introduces a goal-driven risk assessment framework for LLM-powered systems.<n>We demonstrate the framework through a healthcare case study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-08T04:30:27Z)
• POLAR: Automating Cyber Threat Prioritization through LLM-Powered Assessment [13.18964488705143]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are intensively used to assist security analysts in counteracting the rapid exploitation of cyber threats.<n>In this paper, we investigate the intrinsic vulnerabilities of LLMs in cyber threat intelligence (CTI)<n>We introduce a novel categorization methodology that integrates stratification, autoregressive refinement, and human-in-the-loop supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T00:49:20Z)
• On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing [3.11537581064266]
  The paper thoroughly reviews the evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) in penetration testing.<n>It showcases their application across various offensive security tasks and covering broader phases of the cyber kill chain.<n>The paper identifies and discusses significant obstacles impeding wider adoption and safe deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T15:01:18Z)
• LLM Embedding-based Attribution (LEA): Quantifying Source Contributions to Generative Model's Response for Vulnerability Analysis [1.3543506826034255]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for cybersecurity threat analysis, but their deployment in security-sensitive environments raises trust and safety concerns.<n>This work proposes Embedding Attribution (LEA) to analyze the generated responses for vulnerability exploitation analysis.<n>Our results demonstrate LEA's ability to detect clear distinctions between non-retrieval, generic-retrieval, and valid-retrieval scenarios with over 95% accuracy on larger models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T21:20:10Z)
• LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights [12.424610893030353]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are emerging as transformative tools for software vulnerability detection.<n>This paper provides a detailed survey of LLMs in vulnerability detection.<n>We address challenges such as cross-language vulnerability detection, multimodal data integration, and repository-level analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T21:33:38Z)
• Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse.<n>Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration.<n>To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Models [16.305837349514505]
  garak is a framework which can be used to discover and identify vulnerabilities in a target Large Language Models (LLMs) The outputs of the framework describe a target model's weaknesses, contribute to an informed discussion of what composes vulnerabilities in unique contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T18:18:43Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models [127.1107824751703]
  We investigate the potential misuse of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating credible-sounding misinformation. Our study reveals that LLMs can act as effective misinformation generators, leading to a significant degradation in the performance of Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T04:10:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.