Compressed code: the hidden effects of quantization and distillation on programming tokens

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02563v2
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:04:51 GMT
• Title: Compressed code: the hidden effects of quantization and distillation on programming tokens
• Authors: Viacheslav Siniaev, Iaroslav Chelombitko, Aleksey Komissarov,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional code generation capabilities, yet their token-level mechanisms remain underexplored.<n>We introduce a novel cold-start probability analysis method that provides insights into model behavior without requiring explicit prompts.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation of how different model optimization techniques affect token-level representations and code generation quality.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional code generation capabilities, yet their token-level mechanisms remain underexplored, particularly in compressed models. Through systematic analysis of programming language token representations, we characterize how programming languages are encoded in LLM tokenizers by analyzing their vocabulary distribution and keyword coverage patterns. We introduce a novel cold-start probability analysis method that provides insights into model behavior without requiring explicit prompts. Additionally, we present a comprehensive evaluation of how different model optimization techniques - including quantization, distillation, model scaling, and task-specific fine-tuning - affect token-level representations and code generation quality. Our experiments, supported by comprehensive probability distribution analysis and evaluation metrics, reveal critical insights into token-level behavior and provide empirically-validated guidelines for maintaining code generation quality under various optimization constraints. These findings advance both theoretical understanding of LLM code generation and practical implementation of optimized models in production environments.

Related papers

• Code Fingerprints: Disentangled Attribution of LLM-Generated Code [7.515488307576106]
  We study the problem of model-level code attribution, which aims to determine the source LLM responsible for generated code.<n>We propose the Disentangled Code Attribution Network (DCAN), which separates Source-Agnostic semantic information from Source-Specific stylistic representations.<n>We construct the first large-scale benchmark dataset comprising code generated by four widely used Large Language Models (LLMs) across four programming languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T15:58:36Z)
• CodeEval: A pedagogical approach for targeted evaluation of code-trained Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly assessed based on their common sense reasoning, language comprehension, and logical reasoning abilities.<n>Existing benchmark datasets fall short in pinpointing specific strengths and weaknesses.<n>We introduce CodeEval, a multi-dimensional benchmark dataset designed to rigorously evaluate LLMs across 24 distinct aspects of Python programming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T21:42:01Z)
• From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z)
• How Different Tokenization Algorithms Impact LLMs and Transformer Models for Binary Code Analysis [0.0]
  Despite its significance, tokenization in the context of assembly code remains an underexplored area.<n>We explore preprocessing customization options and pre-tokenization rules tailored to the unique characteristics of assembly code.<n>We compare tokenizers based on tokenization efficiency, vocabulary compression, and representational fidelity for assembly code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T19:45:26Z)
• Discrete Tokenization for Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Survey [69.45421620616486]
  This work presents the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for large language models (LLMs)<n>We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines.<n>We identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T10:52:14Z)
• On Explaining (Large) Language Models For Code Using Global Code-Based Explanations [45.126233498200534]
  Language Models for Code (LLM4Code) have significantly changed the landscape of software engineering (SE)<n>We introduce code rationales (Code$Q$), a technique with rigorous mathematical underpinning, to identify subsets of tokens that can explain individual code predictions.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates that Code$Q$ is a powerful interpretability method to explain how (less) meaningful input concepts (i.e., natural language particle at') highly impact output generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T01:00:45Z)
• LLM Processes: Numerical Predictive Distributions Conditioned on Natural Language [35.84181171987974]
  Our goal is to build a regression model that can process numerical data and make probabilistic predictions at arbitrary locations.<n>We start by exploring strategies for eliciting explicit, coherent numerical predictive distributions from Large Language Models.<n>We demonstrate the ability to usefully incorporate text into numerical predictions, improving predictive performance and giving quantitative structure that reflects qualitative descriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T15:13:12Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs [72.65956436513241]
  Decoding methods play an indispensable role in converting language models from next-token predictors into practical task solvers. This paper provides a comprehensive and multifaceted analysis of various decoding methods within the context of large language models. Our findings reveal that decoding method performance is notably task-dependent and influenced by factors such as alignment, model size, and quantization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T11:14:53Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic Structures [74.93762031957883]
  This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code. At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes. We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.