Criminal Liability of Generative Artificial Intelligence Providers for User-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03788v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 10:38:35 GMT
• Title: Criminal Liability of Generative Artificial Intelligence Providers for User-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material
• Authors: Anamaria Mojica-Hanke, Thomas Goger, Svenja Wölfel, Brian Valerius, Steffen Herbold,
• Abstract summary: This study provides a perspective on the different properties of GenAI in the context of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) generation.<n>We found that generating CSAM with GenAI may have criminal and legal consequences for the user committing the primary offense.<n>The assessment of criminal liability may be affected by contextual and technical factors, including the type of generated image, content moderation policies, and the model's intended purpose.
• Score: 4.365951320347686
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The development of more powerful Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has expanded its capabilities and the variety of outputs. This has introduced significant legal challenges, including gray areas in various legal systems, such as the assessment of criminal liability for those responsible for these models. Therefore, we conducted a multidisciplinary study utilizing the statutory interpretation of relevant German laws, which, in conjunction with scenarios, provides a perspective on the different properties of GenAI in the context of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) generation. We found that generating CSAM with GenAI may have criminal and legal consequences not only for the user committing the primary offense but also for individuals responsible for the models, such as independent software developers, researchers, and company representatives. Additionally, the assessment of criminal liability may be affected by contextual and technical factors, including the type of generated image, content moderation policies, and the model's intended purpose. Based on our findings, we discussed the implications for different roles, as well as the requirements when developing such systems.

Related papers

• "Make It Sound Like a Lawyer Wrote It": Scenarios of Potential Impacts of Generative AI for Legal Conflict Resolution [3.4902614817528157]
  We surveyed participants in the EU and US about the potential impact of generative AI on legal conflict resolution.<n>We analysed the prevalence of risk and benefit themes, as well as the types of anticipated legal tasks.<n>We describe the emerging trade-offs that will affect decision-makers in the legal sector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T16:07:39Z)
• Agents of Chaos [50.53354213047402]
  We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment.<n>Twenty AI researchers interacted with the agents under benign and adversarial conditions.<n>Our findings establish the existence of security-, privacy-, and governance-relevant vulnerabilities in realistic deployment settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T16:28:48Z)
• Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z)
• Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
  computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI.<n>We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts.<n>We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z)
• Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration [62.474732677086855]
  This paper presents a causal framework using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) to systematically attribute responsibility in human-AI systems. Two case studies illustrate the framework's adaptability in diverse human-AI collaboration scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:17:45Z)
• Generative Artificial Intelligence Meets Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Survey [49.29751866761522]
  This paper aims to investigate the intersection of GenAI and SAR. First, we illustrate the common data generation-based applications in SAR field. Then, an overview of the latest GenAI models is systematically reviewed. Finally, the corresponding applications in SAR domain are also included.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T03:06:00Z)
• Predicting the Impact of Generative AI Using an Agent-Based Model [0.0]
  Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems have transformed industries by autonomously generating content that mimics human creativity. This paper employs agent-based modeling (ABM) to explore these implications. The ABM integrates individual, business, and governmental agents to simulate dynamics such as education, skills acquisition, AI adoption, and regulatory responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T13:13:56Z)
• Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation [66.06040950325969]
  This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation.<n>By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T05:56:04Z)
• On the Limitations and Prospects of Machine Unlearning for Generative AI [7.795648142175443]
  Generative AI (GenAI) aims to synthesize realistic and diverse data samples from latent variables or other data modalities. GenAI has achieved remarkable results in various domains, such as natural language, images, audio, and graphs. However, they also pose challenges and risks to data privacy, security, and ethics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T08:35:40Z)
• Unsettled Law: Time to Generate New Approaches? [1.3651236252124068]
  We identify several important and unsettled legal questions with profound ethical and societal implications arising from generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) Our key contribution is formally identifying the issues that are unique to GenAI so scholars, practitioners, and others can conduct more useful investigations and discussions. We argue that GenAI's unique attributes, including its general-purpose nature, reliance on massive datasets, and potential for both pervasive societal benefits and harms, necessitate a re-evaluation of existing legal paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T05:51:41Z)
• A Survey on Responsible Generative AI: What to Generate and What Not [15.903523057779651]
  This paper investigates the practical responsible requirements of both textual and visual generative models. We outline five key considerations: generating truthful content, avoiding toxic content, refusing harmful instruction, leaking no training data-related content, and ensuring generated content identifiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T17:53:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.