Women Worry, Men Adopt: How Gendered Perceptions Shape the Use of Generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03880v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:47:39 GMT
• Title: Women Worry, Men Adopt: How Gendered Perceptions Shape the Use of Generative AI
• Abstract summary: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is diffusing rapidly, yet its adoption is strikingly unequal.<n>We show that women adopt GenAI substantially less often than men because they perceive its societal risks differently.<n>We construct a composite index capturing concerns about mental health, privacy, climate impact, and labor market disruption.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is diffusing rapidly, yet its adoption is strikingly unequal. Using nationally representative UK survey data from 2023 to 2024, we show that women adopt GenAI substantially less often than men because they perceive its societal risks differently. We construct a composite index capturing concerns about mental health, privacy, climate impact, and labor market disruption. This index explains between 9 and 18 percent of the variation in GenAI adoption and ranks among the strongest predictors for women across all age groups, surpassing digital literacy and education for young women. Intersectional analyses show that the largest disparities arise among younger, digitally fluent individuals with high societal risk concerns, where gender gaps in personal use exceed 45 percentage points. Using a synthetic twin panel design, we show that increased optimism about AI's societal impact raises GenAI use among young women from 13 percent to 33 percent, substantially narrowing the gender divide. These findings indicate that gendered perceptions of AI's social and ethical consequences, rather than access or capability, are the primary drivers of unequal GenAI adoption, with implications for productivity, skill formation, and economic inequality in an AI enabled economy.

Related papers

• Gender Differences in AI Literacy Workshop Outcomes and Deepfake Engagement [39.984067260070844]
  This study examines gender differences in AI literacy, safety awareness, and STEM career aspirations among Australian secondary students.<n>Using statistical regression methods, we found that pre- workshop, male students reported significantly higher STEM career interest.<n>Female students were significantly more likely to use AI for schoolwork and to seek advice from AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T22:21:08Z)
• Explainable AI as a Double-Edged Sword in Dermatology: The Impact on Clinicians versus The Public [46.86429592892395]
  explainable AI (XAI) addresses this by providing AI decision-making insight.<n>We present results from two large-scale experiments combining a fairness-based diagnosis AI model and different XAI explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T00:06:06Z)
• Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context [32.495879271249414]
  This study presents the first comprehensive empirical mapping of GenAI adoption, usage patterns, and literacy in Italy.<n>Our findings reveal widespread adoption for both work and personal use, including sensitive tasks like emotional support and medical advice.<n>We identify a significant gender divide where women are half as likely to adopt GenAI and use it less frequently than men.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T11:01:28Z)
• Reduced AI Acceptance After the Generative AI Boom: Evidence From a Two-Wave Survey Study [40.26767449635043]
  We examine shifts in public attitudes toward AI before and after the launch of ChatGPT.<n>The proportion of respondents finding AI "not acceptable at all" increased from 23% to 30%.<n>These shifts have amplified existing social inequalities in terms of widened educational, linguistic, and gender gaps post-boom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T17:47:58Z)
• Adultification Bias in LLMs and Text-to-Image Models [55.02903075972816]
  We study bias along axes of race and gender in young girls.<n>We focus on "adultification bias," a phenomenon in which Black girls are presumed to be more defiant, sexually intimate, and culpable than their White peers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T21:02:33Z)
• Perceptions of Discriminatory Decisions of Artificial Intelligence: Unpacking the Role of Individual Characteristics [0.0]
  Personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) are associated with perceptions of AI outcomes. Digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI. Liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T06:18:26Z)
• "I Am the One and Only, Your Cyber BFF": Understanding the Impact of GenAI Requires Understanding the Impact of Anthropomorphic AI [55.99010491370177]
  We argue that we cannot thoroughly map the social impacts of generative AI without mapping the social impacts of anthropomorphic AI. anthropomorphic AI systems are increasingly prone to generating outputs that are perceived to be human-like.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T04:57:41Z)
• Bias in Generative AI [2.5830293457323266]
  This study analyzed images generated by three popular generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to investigate potential bias in AI generators. All three AI generators exhibited bias against women and African Americans. Women were depicted as younger with more smiles and happiness, while men were depicted as older with more neutral expressions and anger.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T07:34:41Z)
• Social AI Improves Well-Being Among Female Young Adults [0.5439020425819]
  The rise of language models like ChatGPT has introduced Social AI as a new form of entertainment. This paper investigates the effects of these interactions on users' social and mental well-being.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T16:44:43Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.