Analyzing Reasoning Consistency in Large Multimodal Models under Cross-Modal Conflicts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04073v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 16:39:34 GMT
• Title: Analyzing Reasoning Consistency in Large Multimodal Models under Cross-Modal Conflicts
• Authors: Zhihao Zhu, Jiafeng Liang, Shixin Jiang, Jinlan Fu, Ming Liu, Guanglu Sun, See-Kiong Ng, Bing Qin,
• Abstract summary: We identify a critical failure mode termed textual inertia, where models tend to blindly adhere to the erroneous text while neglecting conflicting visual evidence.<n>We propose the LogicGraph Perturbation Protocol that structurally injects perturbations into the reasoning chains of diverse LMMs.<n>Results reveal that models successfully self-correct in less than 10% of cases and predominantly succumb to blind textual error propagation.
• Score: 74.47786985522762
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in video reasoning via Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, the robustness of their reasoning chains remains questionable. In this paper, we identify a critical failure mode termed textual inertia, where once a textual hallucination occurs in the thinking process, models tend to blindly adhere to the erroneous text while neglecting conflicting visual evidence. To systematically investigate this, we propose the LogicGraph Perturbation Protocol that structurally injects perturbations into the reasoning chains of diverse LMMs spanning both native reasoning architectures and prompt-driven paradigms to evaluate their self-reflection capabilities. The results reveal that models successfully self-correct in less than 10% of cases and predominantly succumb to blind textual error propagation. To mitigate this, we introduce Active Visual-Context Refinement, a training-free inference paradigm which orchestrates an active visual re-grounding mechanism to enforce fine-grained verification coupled with an adaptive context refinement strategy to summarize and denoise the reasoning history. Experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly stifles hallucination propagation and enhances reasoning robustness.

Related papers

• Guided Verifier: Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning via Dynamic Process Supervision [11.159231524113764]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>In this paper, we propose the textbfGuided Verifier framework to address these structural limitations.<n>We develop a specialized data synthesis pipeline targeting multimodal hallucinations, constructing textbfCoRe dataset of process-level negatives and textbfCorrect-guide textbfReasoning trajectories to train the guided verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T07:38:42Z)
• Seeing Through the Chain: Mitigate Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models via CoT Compression and Contrastive Preference Optimization [78.94590726578014]
  multimodal reasoning models (MLRMs) remain prone to hallucinations, and effective solutions are still underexplored.<n>We propose C3PO, a training-based mitigation framework comprising textbfCompression and textbfPreference textbfOptimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:00:55Z)
• Interleaved Latent Visual Reasoning with Selective Perceptual Modeling [42.93438443502933]
  Interleaved reasoning paradigms enhance Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with visual feedback but are hindered by the prohibitive computational cost.<n>A promising alternative, latent visual reasoning, circumvents this bottleneck yet currently forces a critical trade-off.<n>We introduce Interleaved Latent Visual Reasoning (ILVR), a framework that unifies dynamic state evolution with precise perceptual modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T12:09:39Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Thinking in Large Reasoning Models [2.429493364781869]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning abilities when they generate step-by-step solutions.<n>When trained to using chain-of-thought reasoning examples, the resulting models appear to learn hierarchical thinking strategies similar to those used by humans.<n>In this paper, we adopt a memoryless Finite State Machine formulation to approximate LRM's emerging hierarchical reasoning dynamics as a structured, interpretable abstraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-25T21:25:30Z)
• A Closer Look at Bias and Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness of Large (Vision) Language Models [58.32070787537946]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enhances performance of large language models.<n>We present the first comprehensive study of CoT faithfulness in large vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T18:55:05Z)
• The Curse of CoT: On the Limitations of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning [56.574829311863446]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been widely recognized for its ability to enhance reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>We demonstrate that CoT and its reasoning variants consistently underperform direct answering across varying model scales and benchmark complexities.<n>Our analysis uncovers a fundamental hybrid mechanism of explicit-implicit reasoning driving CoT's performance in pattern-based ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T13:51:06Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)
• What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models [50.97705264224828]
  We propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into Large Multi-modal Models. We aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding. Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T11:27:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.