What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13513v2
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 06:11:25 GMT
- Title: What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models
- Authors: Junho Kim, Yeon Ju Kim, Yong Man Ro,
- Abstract summary: We propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into Large Multi-modal Models.
We aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding.
Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination.
- Score: 50.97705264224828
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents a way of enhancing the reliability of Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) in addressing hallucination, where the models generate cross-modal inconsistent responses. Without additional training, we propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into LMMs using self-generated counterfactual keywords. Our method is grounded in the concept of counterfactual thinking, a cognitive process where human considers alternative realities, enabling more extensive context exploration. Bridging the human cognition mechanism into LMMs, we aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding, mitigating hallucinatory outputs. We further introduce Plausibility Verification Process (PVP), a simple yet robust keyword constraint that effectively filters out sub-optimal keywords to enable the consistent triggering of counterfactual thinking in the model responses. Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination and helps to broaden contextual understanding based on true visual clues.
Related papers
- Thinking Before Looking: Improving Multimodal LLM Reasoning via Mitigating Visual Hallucination [13.706325901731665]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced the integration of visual and linguistic modalities.
Current approaches like chain of thought (CoT) reasoning have augmented the cognitive capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
But their adaptation to MLLMs is hindered by heightened risks of hallucination in cross-modality comprehension.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-15T21:01:37Z) - CODE: Contrasting Self-generated Description to Combat Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models [51.70129969269271]
We introduce a novel contrastive-based decoding method, COuntering DEscription Contrastive Decoding (CODE)
Our method significantly reduces hallucinations and improves cross-modal consistency across various benchmarks and cutting-edge LMMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T03:04:21Z) - Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks.
We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture.
Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z) - Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment -- A
Metacognitive Approach [55.613461060997004]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed transformative advances across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks.
We propose an innovative textitmetacognitive approach, dubbed textbfCLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T19:18:53Z) - Think Twice: Perspective-Taking Improves Large Language Models'
Theory-of-Mind Capabilities [63.90227161974381]
SimToM is a novel prompting framework inspired by Simulation Theory's notion of perspective-taking.
Our approach, which requires no additional training and minimal prompt-tuning, shows substantial improvement over existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T22:49:27Z) - Finding and Editing Multi-Modal Neurons in Pre-Trained Transformers [24.936419036304855]
We propose a novel method to identify key neurons for interpretability.
Our method improves conventional works upon efficiency and applied range by removing needs of costly gradient computation.
Based on those identified neurons, we further design a multi-modal knowledge editing method, beneficial to mitigate sensitive words or hallucination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T17:03:02Z) - Zero-Resource Hallucination Prevention for Large Language Models [45.4155729393135]
"Hallucination" refers to instances where large language models (LLMs) generate factually inaccurate or ungrounded information.
We introduce a novel pre-language self-evaluation technique, referred to as SELF-FAMILIARITY, which focuses on evaluating the model's familiarity with the concepts present in the input instruction.
We validate SELF-FAMILIARITY across four different large language models, demonstrating consistently superior performance compared to existing techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-06T01:57:36Z) - Visual Chain of Thought: Bridging Logical Gaps with Multimodal
Infillings [61.04460792203266]
We introduce VCoT, a novel method that leverages chain-of-thought prompting with vision-language grounding to bridge the logical gaps within sequential data.
Our method uses visual guidance to generate synthetic multimodal infillings that add consistent and novel information to reduce the logical gaps for downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-03T17:58:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.