Attachment Styles and AI Chatbot Interactions Among College Students
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04217v1
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 18:49:07 GMT
- Title: Attachment Styles and AI Chatbot Interactions Among College Students
- Authors: Ziqi Lin, Taiyu Hou,
- Abstract summary: This study explored how college students with different attachment styles describe their interactions with ChatGPT.<n>We identified three main themes: (1) AI as a low-risk emotional space, (2) attachment-congruent patterns of AI engagement, and (3) the paradox of AI intimacy.
- Score: 1.334956439319062
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The use of large language model (LLM)-based AI chatbots among college students has increased rapidly, yet little is known about how individual psychological attributes shape students' interaction patterns with these technologies. This qualitative study explored how college students with different attachment styles describe their interactions with ChatGPT. Using semi-structured interviews with seven undergraduate students and grounded theory analysis, we identified three main themes: (1) AI as a low-risk emotional space, where participants across attachment styles valued the non-judgmental and low-stakes nature of AI interactions; (2) attachment-congruent patterns of AI engagement, where securely attached students integrated AI as a supplementary tool within their existing support systems, while avoidantly attached students used AI to buffer vulnerability and maintain interpersonal boundaries; and (3) the paradox of AI intimacy, capturing the tension between students' willingness to disclose personal information to AI while simultaneously recognizing its limitations as a relational partner. These findings suggest that attachment orientations play an important role in shaping how students experience and interpret their interactions with AI chatbots, extending attachment theory to the domain of human-AI interaction.
Related papers
- ChatGPT-5 in Secondary Education: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Student Attitudes, AI Anxiety, and Hallucination-Aware Use [0.0]
Students used ChatGPT-5 during an eight-hour intervention in the course "Technology"<n>Students engaged in information seeking, CV generation, document and video summarization, image generation, quiz creation, and age-appropriate explanations.<n>After encountering hallucinations, many students reported restricting AI use to domains where they already possessed knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-30T19:28:48Z) - How AI Companionship Develops: Evidence from a Longitudinal Study [14.69112262771543]
We studied the psychological pathway from users' mental models of the agent to parasocial experiences, social interaction, and the psychological impact of AI companions.<n>Results suggest a longitudinal model of AI companionship development and demonstrate an empirical method to study human-AI companionship.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-11T07:36:47Z) - Do Students Rely on AI? Analysis of Student-ChatGPT Conversations from a Field Study [10.71612026319996]
This study analyzed 315 student-AI conversations during a brief, quiz-based scenario across various STEM courses.<n>Students exhibited overall low reliance on AI and many of them could not effectively use AI for learning.<n>Certain behavioral metrics strongly predicted AI reliance, highlighting potential behavioral mechanisms to explain AI adoption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-27T20:00:27Z) - Robots and Children that Learn Together : Improving Knowledge Retention by Teaching Peer-Like Interactive Robots [41.94295877935867]
This study introduces Interactive Reinforcement Learning as a cognitive model for teachable social robots.<n>Children in the LbT condition achieved significantly higher retention gains compared to those in the self-practice condition.<n>This work makes two contributions: (1) it introduces Interactive RL as a pedagogically effective and scalable model for peer-robot learning, and (2) it demonstrates, for the first time, the feasibility of deploying multiple autonomous robots simultaneously in real classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T07:51:04Z) - Building Knowledge from Interactions: An LLM-Based Architecture for Adaptive Tutoring and Social Reasoning [42.09560737219404]
Large Language Models show promise in human-like communication, but their standalone use is hindered by memory constraints and contextual incoherence.<n>This work presents a multimodal, cognitively inspired framework that enhances LLM-based autonomous decision-making in social and task-oriented Human-Robot Interaction.<n>To further enhance autonomy and personalization, we introduce a memory system for selecting, storing and retrieving experiences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T10:45:41Z) - Let people fail! Exploring the influence of explainable virtual and robotic agents in learning-by-doing tasks [45.23431596135002]
This study compares the effects of classic vs. partner-aware explanations on human behavior and performance during a learning-by-doing task.
Results indicated that partner-aware explanations influenced participants differently based on the type of artificial agents involved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-15T13:22:04Z) - Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike.
We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z) - I would love this to be like an assistant, not the teacher: a voice of the customer perspective of what distance learning students want from an Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant [0.0]
This study examined the perceptions of ten online and distance learning students regarding the design of a hypothetical AI Digital Assistant (AIDA)
All participants agreed on the usefulness of such an AI tool while studying and reported benefits from using it for real-time assistance and query resolution, support for academic tasks, personalisation and accessibility, together with emotional and social support.
Students' concerns related to the ethical and social implications of implementing AIDA, data privacy and data use, operational challenges, academic integrity and misuse, and the future of education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-16T08:10:41Z) - Exploring Parent's Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers' Interactive Storytelling and Reading Activities [52.828843153565984]
AI-based storytelling and reading technologies are becoming increasingly ubiquitous in preschoolers' lives.
This paper investigates how they function in practical storytelling and reading scenarios and, how parents, the most critical stakeholders, experience and perceive them.
Our findings suggest that even though AI-based storytelling and reading technologies provide more immersive and engaging interaction, they still cannot meet parents' expectations due to a series of interactive and algorithmic challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T20:55:40Z) - Interrogating AI: Characterizing Emergent Playful Interactions with ChatGPT [10.907980864371213]
This study focuses on playful interactions exhibited by users of a popular AI technology, ChatGPT.<n>We found that more than half (54%) of user discourse revolved around playful interactions.<n>It examines how these interactions can help users understand AI's agency, shape human-AI relationships, and provide insights for designing AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T14:44:13Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and
Implications for AI-Integrated Education [40.38809129759498]
ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training.
On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation.
On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T15:13:14Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Adversarial Interaction Attack: Fooling AI to Misinterpret Human
Intentions [46.87576410532481]
We show that, despite their current huge success, deep learning based AI systems can be easily fooled by subtle adversarial noise.
Based on a case study of skeleton-based human interactions, we propose a novel adversarial attack on interactions.
Our study highlights potential risks in the interaction loop with AI and humans, which need to be carefully addressed when deploying AI systems in safety-critical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-17T16:23:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.