SciFig: Towards Automating Scientific Figure Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04390v1
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 20:56:58 GMT
• Title: SciFig: Towards Automating Scientific Figure Generation
• Abstract summary: SciFig is an end-to-end AI agent system that generates publication-ready pipeline figures directly from research paper texts.<n>We introduce a rubric-based evaluation framework that analyzes 2,219 real scientific figures to extract evaluation rubrics.<n>SciFig demonstrates remarkable performance: achieving 70.1$%$ overall quality on dataset-level evaluation and 66.2$%$ on paper-specific evaluation.
• Score: 41.73701976318102
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Creating high-quality figures and visualizations for scientific papers is a time-consuming task that requires both deep domain knowledge and professional design skills. Despite over 2.5 million scientific papers published annually, the figure generation process remains largely manual. We introduce $\textbf{SciFig}$, an end-to-end AI agent system that generates publication-ready pipeline figures directly from research paper texts. SciFig uses a hierarchical layout generation strategy, which parses research descriptions to identify component relationships, groups related elements into functional modules, and generates inter-module connections to establish visual organization. Furthermore, an iterative chain-of-thought (CoT) feedback mechanism progressively improves layouts through multiple rounds of visual analysis and reasoning. We introduce a rubric-based evaluation framework that analyzes 2,219 real scientific figures to extract evaluation rubrics and automatically generates comprehensive evaluation criteria. SciFig demonstrates remarkable performance: achieving 70.1$\%$ overall quality on dataset-level evaluation and 66.2$\%$ on paper-specific evaluation, and consistently high scores across metrics such as visual clarity, structural organization, and scientific accuracy. SciFig figure generation pipeline and our evaluation benchmark will be open-sourced.

Related papers

• Deep Academic Survey: Stateful Agentic Closed-Loop Paradigm for Academic Survey Automation [60.151050016855834]
  DAS is a stateful agentic framework for generating publication-oriented academic surveys.<n>Its key idea is to separate reusable paper analysis from topic-specific manuscript construction.<n>DAS achieves the highest average in all four dimensions, with an overall score of 4.34 compared with 4.03 for the strongest competitor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T17:29:00Z)
• TVIR: Building Deep Research Agents Towards Text--Visual Interleaved Report Generation [63.89818340842003]
  TVIR (Text--Visual Interleaved Report Generation) is a benchmark of 100 expert-curated multimodal deep research tasks.<n>TVIR-Agent is a hierarchical multi-agent framework that serves as a strong baseline for constructing outlines and retrieving images.<n>We develop a dual-path evaluation framework that combines Textual Assessment and Visual Assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T14:35:14Z)
• Paper Circle: An Open-source Multi-agent Research Discovery and Analysis Framework [82.66443886385125]
  Paper Circle is a discovery and analysis system designed to reduce the effort required to find, assess, organize, and understand academic literature.<n>The system comprises two complementary pipelines: (1) a Discovery Pipeline that integrates offline and online retrieval from multiple sources, multi-agent scoring, diversity-aware ranking, and structured outputs; and (2) an Analysis Pipeline that transforms individual papers into structured knowledge graphs with typed nodes such as concepts, methods, and figures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T17:59:58Z)
• DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing [53.85037373860246]
  We introduce Deep Synth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization)<n>Our results demonstrate that agentic plan-and-write significantly outperform single-turn generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T03:07:52Z)
• Paper2SysArch: Structure-Constrained System Architecture Generation from Scientific Papers [10.395280181257737]
  We introduce a novel benchmark to quantitatively evaluate the automated generation of diagrams from text.<n>It consists of 3,000 research papers paired with their corresponding high-quality ground-truth diagrams and is accompanied by a three-tiered evaluation metric.<n>We propose Paper2Arch, an end-to-end system that leverages multi-agent collaboration to convert papers into structured, editable diagrams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-22T12:24:30Z)
• Scaling Beyond Context: A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Document Understanding [61.36285696607487]
  Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery.<n>Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) face key limitations.<n>Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents' multimodal nature, combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T02:33:16Z)
• Context-Aware Hierarchical Taxonomy Generation for Scientific Papers via LLM-Guided Multi-Aspect Clustering [59.54662810933882]
  Existing taxonomy construction methods, leveraging unsupervised clustering or direct prompting of large language models, often lack coherence and granularity.<n>We propose a novel context-aware hierarchical taxonomy generation framework that integrates LLM-guided multi-aspect encoding with dynamic clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T15:12:58Z)
• Meow: End-to-End Outline Writing for Automatic Academic Survey [24.749855249116802]
  We propose Meow, a framework that produces organized and faithful outlines efficiently.<n>We first formulate outline writing as an end-to-end task that generates hierarchical structured outlines from paper metadata.<n>We then curate a high-quality dataset of surveys from arXiv, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, and establish systematic evaluation metrics for outline quality assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T07:20:53Z)
• SurGE: A Benchmark and Evaluation Framework for Scientific Survey Generation [37.921524136479825]
  SurGE (Survey Generation Evaluation) is a new benchmark for scientific survey generation in computer science.<n>SurGE consists of (1) a collection of test instances, each including a topic description, an expert-written survey, and its full set of cited references, and (2) a large-scale academic corpus of over one million papers.<n>In addition, we propose an automated evaluation framework that measures the quality of generated surveys across four dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T15:45:10Z)
• HySemRAG: A Hybrid Semantic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Automated Literature Synthesis and Methodological Gap Analysis [55.2480439325792]
  HySemRAG is a framework that combines Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) pipelines with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>System addresses limitations in existing RAG architectures through a multi-layered approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T20:30:42Z)
• SciSage: A Multi-Agent Framework for High-Quality Scientific Survey Generation [2.985620880452744]
  SciSage is a multi-agent framework employing a reflect-when-you-write paradigm.<n>It critically evaluates drafts at outline, section, and document levels, collaborating with specialized agents for query interpretation, content retrieval, and refinement.<n>We also release SurveyScope, a benchmark of 46 high-impact papers ( 2020-2025) across 11 computer science domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T02:23:47Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• CORAL: COde RepresentAtion Learning with Weakly-Supervised Transformers for Analyzing Data Analysis [33.190021245507445]
  Large scale analysis of source code, and in particular scientific source code, holds the promise of better understanding the data science process. We propose a novel weakly supervised transformer-based architecture for computing joint representations of code from both abstract syntax trees and surrounding natural language comments. We show that our model, leveraging only easily-available weak supervision, achieves a 38% increase in accuracy over expert-supplieds and outperforms a suite of baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T19:57:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.