Adversarial Yet Cooperative: Multi-Perspective Reasoning in Retrieved-Augmented Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04651v2
• Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 03:12:04 GMT
• Title: Adversarial Yet Cooperative: Multi-Perspective Reasoning in Retrieved-Augmented Language Models
• Authors: Can Xu, Lingyong Yan, Jiayi Wu, Haosen Wang, Shuaiqiang Wang, Yuchen Li, Jizhou Huang, Dawei Yin, Xiang Li,
• Abstract summary: We propose a Reasoner-Verifier framework named Adrialversa Reasoning RAG (ARR)<n>The Reasoner and Verifier engage in reasoning on retrieved evidence and critiquing each other's logic while being guided by process-aware advantage.<n> Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
• Score: 72.4149653187766
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in synergizing large reasoning models (LRMs) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have shown promising results, yet two critical challenges remain: (1) reasoning models typically operate from a single, unchallenged perspective, limiting their ability to conduct deep, self-correcting reasoning over external documents, and (2) existing training paradigms rely excessively on outcome-oriented rewards, which provide insufficient signal for shaping the complex, multi-step reasoning process. To address these issues, we propose an Reasoner-Verifier framework named Adversarial Reasoning RAG (ARR). The Reasoner and Verifier engage in reasoning on retrieved evidence and critiquing each other's logic while being guided by process-aware advantage that requires no external scoring model. This reward combines explicit observational signals with internal model uncertainty to jointly optimize reasoning fidelity and verification rigor. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Related papers

• Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner Collaboration [49.9937230730202]
  We propose Search-R2, a novel Actor-Refiner collaboration framework that enhances reasoning through targeted intervention.<n>Our approach decomposes the generation process into an Actor, which produces initial reasoning trajectories.<n>We show that Search-R2 consistently outperforms strong RAG and RL-based baselines across model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T15:32:09Z)
• CASHEW: Stabilizing Multimodal Reasoning via Iterative Trajectory Aggregation [6.356820150960838]
  We introduce two complementary approaches inspired by test-time scaling to stabilize vision-language models.<n>CASHEW is an inference-time framework that stabilizes reasoning by iteratively aggregating multiple candidate trajectories into higher-quality reasoning traces.<n>CASHEW-RL is trained using Group Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) with a composite reward that encourages correct answers grounded in minimal yet sufficient visual evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T21:24:45Z)
• Analyzing Reasoning Consistency in Large Multimodal Models under Cross-Modal Conflicts [74.47786985522762]
  We identify a critical failure mode termed textual inertia, where models tend to blindly adhere to the erroneous text while neglecting conflicting visual evidence.<n>We propose the LogicGraph Perturbation Protocol that structurally injects perturbations into the reasoning chains of diverse LMMs.<n>Results reveal that models successfully self-correct in less than 10% of cases and predominantly succumb to blind textual error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T16:39:34Z)
• Abductive Inference in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models: Generating and Validating Missing Premises [0.0]
  We propose a framework that integrates abductive inference into retrieval-augmented LLMs.<n> Experimental results on abductive reasoning and multi-hop QA benchmarks show that our approach improves both answer accuracy and reasoning faithfulness.<n>This work highlights abductive inference as a promising direction for enhancing the robustness and explainability of RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T03:37:24Z)
• ROVER: Benchmarking Reciprocal Cross-Modal Reasoning for Omnimodal Generation [79.17352367219736]
  ROVER tests the use of one modality to guide, verify, or refine outputs in the other.<n>ROVER is a human-annotated benchmark that explicitly targets reciprocal cross-modal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T02:27:46Z)
• Incentivizing Consistent, Effective and Scalable Reasoning Capability in Audio LLMs via Reasoning Process Rewards [24.40159537923851]
  We develop a principled method for developing robust and scalable reasoning in Audio Large Language Models.<n>We achieve state-of-the-art results on MMAU Test-mini, substantially outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4o Audio, and near-human-level performance on MMSU reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T06:18:10Z)
• VAR: Visual Attention Reasoning via Structured Search and Backtracking [49.427842994857635]
  We introduce Visual Attention Reasoning, a framework that recasts grounded reasoning as a structured search.<n> VAR decomposes the reasoning process into two key stages: traceable evidence grounding and search-based chain-of-thought.<n>We show that our 7B model, VAR-7B, sets a new state-of-the-art on a comprehensive suite of hallucination and safety benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T13:18:44Z)
• Don't Overthink It: A Survey of Efficient R1-style Large Reasoning Models [49.598776427454176]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have gradually become a research hotspot due to their outstanding performance in handling complex tasks.<n>However, with the widespread application of these models, the problem of overthinking has gradually emerged.<n>Various efficient reasoning methods have been proposed, aiming to reduce the length of reasoning paths without compromising model performance and reasoning capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:54:31Z)
• Lost at the Beginning of Reasoning [85.17612793300238]
  We show that the first reasoning step exerts a disproportionately large influence on the final prediction.<n>We propose an efficient sampling strategy that leverages a reward model to identify and retain high-quality first reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T09:53:57Z)
• Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reward Model through Reinforcement Fine-Tuning [31.727984223052648]
  This paper proposes UnifiedReward-Think, the first unified multimodal CoT-based reward model.<n>We first use a small amount of image generation preference data to distill the reasoning process of GPT-4o.<n>We then prepare large-scale unified multimodal preference data to elicit the model's reasoning process across various vision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T08:46:41Z)
• Rethinking harmless refusals when fine-tuning foundation models [0.8571111167616167]
  We investigate the degree to which fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) effectively mitigates versus merely conceals undesirable behavior. We identify a pervasive phenomenon we term emphreason-based deception, where models either stop producing reasoning traces or produce seemingly ethical reasoning traces that belie the unethical nature of their final outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T22:08:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.