Automatic Question Generation for Intuitive Learning Utilizing Causal Graph Guided Chain of Thought Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06098v1
• Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2026 08:49:58 GMT
• Title: Automatic Question Generation for Intuitive Learning Utilizing Causal Graph Guided Chain of Thought Reasoning
• Authors: Nicholas X. Wang, Neel V. Parpia, Aaryan D. Parikh, Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework that combines causal-graph-guided Chain-of-Thought reasoning with a multi-agent language model.<n>This approach ensures the generation of accurate, meaningful, and curriculum-aligned questions.<n> Experimental results demonstrate up to a 70% improvement in quality compared to reference methods.
• Score: 8.587087233323038
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Intuitive learning is crucial for developing deep conceptual understanding, especially in STEM education, where students often struggle with abstract and interconnected concepts. Automatic question generation has become an effective strategy for personalized and adaptive learning. However, its effectiveness is hindered by hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), which may generate factually incorrect, ambiguous, or pedagogically inconsistent questions. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework that combines causal-graph-guided Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning with a multi-agent LLM architecture. This approach ensures the generation of accurate, meaningful, and curriculum-aligned questions. Causal graphs provide an explicit representation of domain knowledge, while CoT reasoning facilitates a structured, step-by-step traversal of related concepts. Dedicated LLM agents are assigned specific tasks such as graph pathfinding, reasoning, validation, and output, all working within domain constraints. A dual validation mechanism-at both the conceptual and output stages-greatly reduces hallucinations. Experimental results demonstrate up to a 70% improvement in quality compared to reference methods and yielded highly favorable outcomes in subjective evaluations.

Related papers

• CoT-Seg: Rethinking Segmentation with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Self-Correction [50.67483317563736]
  This paper aims to explore a system that can think step-by-step, look up information if needed, generate results, self-evaluate its own results, and refine the results.<n>We introduce CoT-Seg, a training-free framework that rethinks reasoning segmentation by combining chain-of-thought reasoning with self-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T11:41:54Z)
• See, Think, Learn: A Self-Taught Multimodal Reasoner [3.443084677278651]
  We propose a simple yet effective self-training framework called See-Think-Learn.<n>At its core, STL introduces a structured reasoning template that encourages the model to see before thinking.<n>We augment the training data with negative rationales to enhance the model's ability to distinguish between correct and misleading responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T06:30:10Z)
• GRIL: Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Integrated Learning with Large Language Models [59.72897499248909]
  We propose a novel graph retriever trained end-to-end with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Within the extracted subgraph, structural knowledge and semantic features are encoded via soft tokens and the verbalized graph, respectively, which are infused into the LLM together.<n>Our approach consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, validating the strength of joint graph-LLM optimization for complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T02:38:00Z)
• PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
  PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z)
• Visualizing Thought: Conceptual Diagrams Enable Robust Planning in LMMs [59.66595230543127]
  Conceptual diagrams externalize mental models, abstracting irrelevant details to efficiently capture how entities interact.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large MultiModal Models (LMMs) predominantly reason through text.<n>We propose Visual Thinking, a generalizable framework that enables LMMs to reason through multiple chains of self-generated conceptual diagrams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T18:27:02Z)
• Causal Graphs Meet Thoughts: Enhancing Complex Reasoning in Graph-Augmented LLMs [4.701165676405066]
  It is critical not only to retrieve relevant information but also to provide causal reasoning and explainability.<n>This paper proposes a novel pipeline that filters large knowledge graphs to emphasize cause-effect edges.<n> Experiments on medical question-answering tasks show consistent gains, with up to a 10% absolute improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T19:31:06Z)
• A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMs [3.2228025627337864]
  This paper introduces a structured evaluation framework to dissect the perception-reasoning interface in Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>We propose three distinct evaluation paradigms, mirroring human problem-solving strategies.<n>Applying this framework, we demonstrate that CA, leveraging powerful language models for reasoning over rich, independently generated descriptions, achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T12:42:42Z)
• Reasoning with Graphs: Structuring Implicit Knowledge to Enhance LLMs Reasoning [73.2950349728376]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across a wide range of tasks.<n>However, they still encounter challenges in reasoning tasks that require understanding and inferring relationships between pieces of information.<n>This challenge is particularly pronounced in tasks involving multi-step processes, such as logical reasoning and multi-hop question answering.<n>We propose Reasoning with Graphs (RwG) by first constructing explicit graphs from the context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T05:18:20Z)
• Debate on Graph: a Flexible and Reliable Reasoning Framework for Large Language Models [33.662269036173456]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) may suffer from hallucinations in real-world applications due to the lack of relevant knowledge. Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) serves as a critical touchstone for the integration. We propose an interactive KGQA framework that leverages the interactive learning capabilities of LLMs to perform reasoning and Debating over Graphs (DoG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T01:11:58Z)
• LLMs can Find Mathematical Reasoning Mistakes by Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought [28.122761006724925]
  The Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought (PedCoT) is designed to guide the identification of reasoning mistakes.<n>PedCoT consists of pedagogical principles for prompts (PPP) design, two-stage interaction process (TIP) and grounded PedCoT prompts.<n>The proposed method can achieve the goal of reliable mathematical mistake identification and provide a foundation for automatic math answer grading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T07:37:34Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.