Semantic Misalignment in Vision-Language Models under Perceptual Degradation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08355v2
• Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:10:05 GMT
• Title: Semantic Misalignment in Vision-Language Models under Perceptual Degradation
• Authors: Guo Cheng,
• Abstract summary: We study semantic misalignment in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) under controlled degradation of visual perception.<n>We observe severe failures in downstream VLM behavior, including hallucinated object mentions, omission of safety-critical entities, and inconsistent safety judgments.<n>Our results reveal a clear disconnect between pixel-level robustness and multimodal semantic reliability, highlighting a critical limitation of current VLM-based systems.
• Score: 2.9140696506330723
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in autonomous driving and embodied AI systems, where reliable perception is critical for safe semantic reasoning and decision-making. While recent VLMs demonstrate strong performance on multimodal benchmarks, their robustness to realistic perception degradation remains poorly understood. In this work, we systematically study semantic misalignment in VLMs under controlled degradation of upstream visual perception, using semantic segmentation on the Cityscapes dataset as a representative perception module. We introduce perception-realistic corruptions that induce only moderate drops in conventional segmentation metrics, yet observe severe failures in downstream VLM behavior, including hallucinated object mentions, omission of safety-critical entities, and inconsistent safety judgments. To quantify these effects, we propose a set of language-level misalignment metrics that capture hallucination, critical omission, and safety misinterpretation, and analyze their relationship with segmentation quality across multiple contrastive and generative VLMs. Our results reveal a clear disconnect between pixel-level robustness and multimodal semantic reliability, highlighting a critical limitation of current VLM-based systems and motivating the need for evaluation frameworks that explicitly account for perception uncertainty in safety-critical applications.

Related papers

• Same Answer, Different Representations: Hidden instability in VLMs [65.36933543377346]
  We introduce a representation-aware and frequency-aware evaluation framework that measures internal embedding drift, spectral sensitivity, and structural smoothness.<n>We apply this framework to modern Vision Language Models (VLMs) across the SEEDBench, MMMU, and POPE datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T12:24:26Z)
• The Shadow Self: Intrinsic Value Misalignment in Large Language Model Agents [37.75212140218036]
  We formalize the Loss-of-Control risk and identify the previously underexamined Intrinsic Value Misalignment (Intrinsic VM)<n>We then introduce IMPRESS, a scenario-driven framework for systematically assessing this risk.<n>We evaluate Intrinsic VM on 21 state-of-the-art LLM agents and find that it is a common and broadly observed safety risk across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T07:09:50Z)
• ReViP: Reducing False Completion in Vision-Language-Action Models with Vision-Proprioception Rebalance [50.05984919728878]
  We present ReViP, a novel VLA framework with Vision-Proprioception Rebalance to enhance visual grounding and robustness under perturbations.<n>Specifically, we use an external VLM as a task-stage observer to extract real-time task-centric visual cues from visual observations.<n>To evaluate false completion, we propose the first False-Completion Benchmark Suite built on LIBERO with controlled settings such as Object-Drop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T11:31:07Z)
• When Alignment Fails: Multimodal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [75.16145284285456]
  We introduce VLA-Fool, a comprehensive study of multimodal adversarial robustness in embodied VLA models under both white-box and black-box settings.<n>We develop the first automatically crafted and semantically guided prompting framework.<n> Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark reveal that even minor multimodal perturbations can cause significant behavioral deviations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T10:14:32Z)
• VLMs Guided Interpretable Decision Making for Autonomous Driving [39.29020915361483]
  We evaluate state-of-the-art open-source vision-language models (VLMs) on high-level decision-making tasks.<n>We propose a new approach that shifts the role of VLMs from direct decision generators to semantic enhancers.<n>Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance, offering a promising direction for integrating VLMs into reliable and interpretable AD systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T19:57:51Z)
• AUVIC: Adversarial Unlearning of Visual Concepts for Multi-modal Large Language Models [63.05306474002547]
  Regulatory frameworks mandating the 'right to be forgotten' drive the need for machine unlearning.<n>We introduce AUVIC, a novel visual concept unlearning framework for MLLMs.<n>We show that AUVIC achieves state-of-the-art target forgetting rates while incurs minimal performance degradation on non-target concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T13:35:32Z)
• Contamination Detection for VLMs using Multi-Modal Semantic Perturbation [73.76465227729818]
  Open-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on benchmark tasks.<n>Pretraining corpora raise a critical concern for both practitioners and users: inflated performance due to test-set leakage.<n>We show that existing detection approaches either fail outright or exhibit inconsistent behavior.<n>We propose a novel simple yet effective detection method based on multi-modal semantic perturbation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T18:59:52Z)
• CF-VLM:CounterFactual Vision-Language Fine-tuning [10.299136720220416]
  CounterFactual Vision-Language Fine-tuning (CF-VLM) is a novel framework that enhances causal reasoning capabilities of vision-language models.<n>CF-VLM introduces three complementary training objectives: maintaining foundational cross-modal alignment, reinforcing the uniqueness and stability of factual scene representations, and sharpening the model's sensitivity to minimal but critical causal edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T20:20:05Z)
• Seeing is Believing, but How Much? A Comprehensive Analysis of Verbalized Calibration in Vision-Language Models [15.158475816860427]
  Uncertainty is essential for assessing the reliability and trustworthiness of modern AI systems.<n> verbalized uncertainty, where models express their confidence through natural language, has emerged as a lightweight and interpretable solution.<n>However, its effectiveness in vision-language models (VLMs) remains insufficiently studied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T17:16:36Z)
• REVAL: A Comprehension Evaluation on Reliability and Values of Large Vision-Language Models [59.445672459851274]
  REVAL is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the textbfREliability and textbfVALue of Large Vision-Language Models.<n>REVAL encompasses over 144K image-text Visual Question Answering (VQA) samples, structured into two primary sections: Reliability and Values.<n>We evaluate 26 models, including mainstream open-source LVLMs and prominent closed-source models like GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5-Pro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T07:54:35Z)
• Understanding and Rectifying Safety Perception Distortion in VLMs [19.239094089025095]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) become more susceptible to harmful requests and jailbreak attacks after integrating the vision modality.<n> multimodal inputs introduce an modality-induced activation shift toward a "safer" direction compared to their text-only counterparts.<n>We propose ShiftDC, a training-free method that decomposes and calibrates the modality-induced activation shift to reduce the impact of modality on safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T18:06:48Z)
• Are VLMs Ready for Autonomous Driving? An Empirical Study from the Reliability, Data, and Metric Perspectives [56.528835143531694]
  We introduce DriveBench, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Our findings reveal that VLMs often generate plausible responses derived from general knowledge or textual cues rather than true visual grounding.<n>We propose refined evaluation metrics that prioritize robust visual grounding and multi-modal understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T18:59:55Z)
• Sycophancy in Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis and an Inference-Time Mitigation Framework [18.54098084470481]
  We analyze sycophancy across vision-language benchmarks and propose an inference-time mitigation framework.<n>Our framework effectively mitigates sycophancy across all evaluated models, while maintaining performance on neutral prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T01:03:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.