Auditing Student-AI Collaboration: A Case Study of Online Graduate CS Students

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08697v2
• Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:19:42 GMT
• Title: Auditing Student-AI Collaboration: A Case Study of Online Graduate CS Students
• Abstract summary: generative AI increasingly shapes how students complete academic tasks.<n>Concerns persist regarding over-automation, diminished student agency, and the potential for unreliable or hallucinated outputs.<n>This study conducts a mixed-methods audit of student-AI collaboration preferences.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As generative AI becomes embedded in higher education, it increasingly shapes how students complete academic tasks. While these systems offer efficiency and support, concerns persist regarding over-automation, diminished student agency, and the potential for unreliable or hallucinated outputs. This study conducts a mixed-methods audit of student-AI collaboration preferences by examining the alignment between current AI capabilities and students' desired levels of automation in academic work. Using two sequential and complementary surveys, we capture students' perceived benefits, risks, and preferred boundaries when using AI. The first survey employs an existing task-based framework to assess preferences for and actual usage of AI across 12 academic tasks, alongside primary concerns and reasons for use. The second survey, informed by the first, explores how AI systems could be designed to address these concerns through open-ended questions. This study aims to identify gaps between existing AI affordances and students' normative expectations of collaboration, informing the development of more effective and trustworthy AI systems for education.

Related papers

• Co-Writing with AI: An Empirical Study of Diverse Academic Writing Workflows [3.657364561148215]
  This study examines how students engage with AI across different writing tasks.<n>Individual factors including AI literacy, writing confidence, trust, authorship concerns, and motivation are studied.<n>We suggest that AI integration is selective and heterogeneous, forming three recurring and value-oriented configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T09:00:48Z)
• Towards an AI Buddy for every University Student? Exploring Students' Experiences, Attitudes and Motivations towards AI and AI-based Study Companions [4.16108684206315]
  This study investigates students' prior experiences with AI tools, their perceived digital and AI-related competences, and their interest in emerging technologies.<n>Based on a survey of 926 students at a Swiss university, students revealed widespread prior use of AI, primarily for text-based and productivity tasks, with moderate self-assessed digital competence.<n>Students expressed strong enthusiasm for adopting an AI Buddy, valuing its potential for time efficiency, personalized academic support, and study organization, but expressed significant concerns about data privacy and over-reliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T18:44:41Z)
• AI Literacy, Safety Awareness, and STEM Career Aspirations of Australian Secondary Students: Evaluating the Impact of Workshop Interventions [38.350232667249095]
  Deepfakes and other forms of synthetic media pose growing safety risks for adolescents.<n>This study evaluates the impact of Day of AI Australia's workshop-based intervention on Australian secondary students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T02:55:53Z)
• Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Research [58.95406995634148]
  We argue that systems research, long focused on designing and evaluating new performance-oriented algorithms, is particularly well-suited for AI-driven solution discovery.<n>We term this approach as AI-Driven Research for Systems ( ADRS), which iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines solutions.<n>Our results highlight both the disruptive potential and the urgent need to adapt systems research practices in the age of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:49:24Z)
• Look: AI at Work! - Analysing Key Aspects of AI-support at the Work Place [39.146761527401424]
  We look at the areas of AI that the applications are concerned with.<n>This includes the importance of high-quality data for training learning-based systems.<n>In terms of the psychological factors we derive research questions to investigate in the development of AI supported work systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T12:51:23Z)
• Do Students Rely on AI? Analysis of Student-ChatGPT Conversations from a Field Study [10.71612026319996]
  This study analyzed 315 student-AI conversations during a brief, quiz-based scenario across various STEM courses.<n>Students exhibited overall low reliance on AI and many of them could not effectively use AI for learning.<n>Certain behavioral metrics strongly predicted AI reliance, highlighting potential behavioral mechanisms to explain AI adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T20:00:27Z)
• Learning to Use AI for Learning: How Can We Effectively Teach and Measure Prompting Literacy for K-12 Students? [1.413488665073795]
  There is a growing need to equip the next generation with the ability to apply, interact with, evaluate, and collaborate with AI systems responsibly.<n>To address this need, we designed an Large-Language Model (LLM)-based module to teach prompting literacy.<n>We conducted two iterations of classroom deployment in 11 authentic secondary education classrooms, and evaluated 1) AI-based auto-grader's capability; 2) students' prompting performance and confidence changes towards using AI for learning; and 3) the quality of learning and assessment materials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T15:54:51Z)
• A Mixed User-Centered Approach to Enable Augmented Intelligence in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: The Case of MathAIde app [1.303431104836083]
  We present MathAIde, an ITS that uses computer vision and AI to correct mathematics exercises from student work photos and provide feedback.<n>Findings emphasize the importance of a teacher-centered, user-driven approach, where AI suggests remediation alternatives while teachers retain decision-making.<n>Results highlight efficiency, usability, and adoption potential in classroom contexts, particularly in resource-limited environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T18:56:01Z)
• Evaluating AI-Powered Learning Assistants in Engineering Higher Education: Student Engagement, Ethical Challenges, and Policy Implications [0.2099922236065961]
  This study evaluates the Educational AI Hub, an AI-powered learning framework, implemented in undergraduate civil and environmental engineering courses at a large R1 public university.<n>Students valued the AI assistant for its accessibility and comfort, with nearly half reporting greater ease using it than seeking help from instructors or teaching assistants.<n>Ethical uncertainty, particularly around institutional policy and academic integrity, emerged as a key barrier to full engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T03:02:49Z)
• Methodological Foundations for AI-Driven Survey Question Generation [41.94295877935867]
  This paper presents a methodological framework for using generative AI in educational survey research.<n>We explore how Large Language Models can generate adaptive, context-aware survey questions.<n>We examine ethical issues such as bias, privacy, and transparency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T09:50:34Z)
• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• Let people fail! Exploring the influence of explainable virtual and robotic agents in learning-by-doing tasks [45.23431596135002]
  This study compares the effects of classic vs. partner-aware explanations on human behavior and performance during a learning-by-doing task. Results indicated that partner-aware explanations influenced participants differently based on the type of artificial agents involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T13:22:04Z)
• I would love this to be like an assistant, not the teacher: a voice of the customer perspective of what distance learning students want from an Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant [0.0]
  This study examined the perceptions of ten online and distance learning students regarding the design of a hypothetical AI Digital Assistant (AIDA) All participants agreed on the usefulness of such an AI tool while studying and reported benefits from using it for real-time assistance and query resolution, support for academic tasks, personalisation and accessibility, together with emotional and social support. Students' concerns related to the ethical and social implications of implementing AIDA, data privacy and data use, operational challenges, academic integrity and misuse, and the future of education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T08:10:41Z)
• AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.