Revisiting Software Engineering Education in the Era of Large Language Models: A Curriculum Adaptation and Academic Integrity Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08857v1
• Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 22:41:47 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Software Engineering Education in the Era of Large Language Models: A Curriculum Adaptation and Academic Integrity Framework
• Authors: Mustafa Degerli,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a theoretical framework for analyzing how generative AI alters core software engineering competencies.<n> Attention is given to computer engineering programs in Turkey, where centralized regulation, large class sizes, and exam-oriented assessment practices amplify these challenges.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot, into professional workflows is increasingly reshaping software engineering practices. These tools have lowered the cost of code generation, explanation, and testing, while introducing new forms of automation into routine development tasks. In contrast, most of the software engineering and computer engineering curricula remain closely aligned with pedagogical models that equate manual syntax production with technical competence. This growing misalignment raises concerns regarding assessment validity, learning outcomes, and the development of foundational skills. Adopting a conceptual research approach, this paper proposes a theoretical framework for analyzing how generative AI alters core software engineering competencies and introduces a pedagogical design model for LLM-integrated education. Attention is given to computer engineering programs in Turkey, where centralized regulation, large class sizes, and exam-oriented assessment practices amplify these challenges. The framework delineates how problem analysis, design, implementation, and testing increasingly shift from construction toward critique, validation, and human-AI stewardship. In addition, the paper argues that traditional plagiarism-centric integrity mechanisms are becoming insufficient, motivating a transition toward a process transparency model. While this work provides a structured proposal for curriculum adaptation, it remains a theoretical contribution; the paper concludes by outlining the need for longitudinal empirical studies to evaluate these interventions and their long-term impacts on learning.

Related papers

• Advances and Frontiers of LLM-based Issue Resolution in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Survey [59.3507264893654]
  Issue resolution is a complex Software Engineering task integral to real-world development.<n> benchmarks like SWE-bench revealed this task as profoundly difficult for large language models.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of this emerging domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T18:55:03Z)
• Coding With AI: From a Reflection on Industrial Practices to Future Computer Science and Software Engineering Education [1.5516092077598485]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have introduced new paradigms in software development.<n>This paper investigates how LLM coding tools are used in professional practice, associated concerns and risks, and the resulting transformations in development.<n>Building on these insights, we argue for curricular shifts toward problem-solving, architectural thinking, code review, and early project-based learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T04:39:59Z)
• Learning to Code with Context: A Study-Based Approach [0.28675177318965045]
  The rapid emergence of generative AI tools is transforming the way software is developed.<n>Project-based courses offer an effective environment to explore and evaluate the integration of AI assistance into real-world development practices.<n>This paper presents our approach and a user study conducted within a university programming project in which students collaboratively developed computer games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T20:40:36Z)
• A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
  "Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Benchmarks and Solutions in Software Engineering of LLM-Empowered Agentic System [56.40989626804489]
  This survey provides the first holistic analysis of Large Language Models-powered software engineering.<n>We review over 150 recent papers and propose a taxonomy along two key dimensions: (1) Solutions, categorized into prompt-based, fine-tuning-based, and agent-based paradigms, and (2) Benchmarks, including tasks such as code generation, translation, and repair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T06:56:50Z)
• SENAI: Towards Software Engineering Native Generative Artificial Intelligence [3.915435754274075]
  This paper argues for the integration of Software Engineering knowledge into Large Language Models.<n>The aim is to propose a new direction where LLMs can move beyond mere functional accuracy to perform generative tasks.<n>Software engineering native generative models will not only overcome the shortcomings present in current models but also pave the way for the next generation of generative models capable of handling real-world software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T15:02:07Z)
• Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shift [9.284024538100063]
  This vision paper examines how the integration of large language models into software engineering disrupts established research paradigms.<n>We discuss how it transforms the phenomena we study, the methods and theories we rely on, the data we analyze, and the threats to validity that arise in dynamic AI-mediated environments.<n>Our aim is to help the empirical software engineering community adapt its questions, instruments, and validation standards to a future in which AI systems are not merely tools, but active collaborators shaping software engineering and its study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T04:13:07Z)
• Combatting Human Trafficking in the Cyberspace: A Natural Language Processing-Based Methodology to Analyze the Language in Online Advertisements [55.2480439325792]
  This project tackles the pressing issue of human trafficking in online C2C marketplaces through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. We introduce a novel methodology for generating pseudo-labeled datasets with minimal supervision, serving as a rich resource for training state-of-the-art NLP models. A key contribution is the implementation of an interpretability framework using Integrated Gradients, providing explainable insights crucial for law enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T02:45:01Z)
• ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development [84.90400377131962]
  ChatDev is a chat-powered software development framework in which specialized agents are guided in what to communicate. These agents actively contribute to the design, coding, and testing phases through unified language-based communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T02:11:34Z)
• Navigating the Complexity of Generative AI Adoption in Software Engineering [6.190511747986327]
  The adoption patterns of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within software engineering are investigated. Influencing factors at the individual, technological, and societal levels are analyzed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T11:05:19Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)
• Towards CRISP-ML(Q): A Machine Learning Process Model with Quality Assurance Methodology [53.063411515511056]
  We propose a process model for the development of machine learning applications. The first phase combines business and data understanding as data availability oftentimes affects the feasibility of the project. The sixth phase covers state-of-the-art approaches for monitoring and maintenance of a machine learning applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-11T08:25:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.