LERA: Reinstating Judgment as a Structural Precondition for Execution in Automated Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08880v1
• Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:39:55 GMT
• Title: LERA: Reinstating Judgment as a Structural Precondition for Execution in Automated Systems
• Abstract summary: Judgment is typically introduced as an external intervention rather than a native precondition to execution.<n>This paper proposes LERA, a structural framework that enforces judgment as a mandatory, non-bypassable prerequisite for execution.
• Score: 1.4231914840649322
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As automated systems increasingly transition from decision support to direct execution, the problem of accountability shifts from decision quality to execution legitimacy. While optimization, execution, and feedback mechanisms are extensively modeled in contemporary AI and control architectures, the structural role of judgment remains undefined. Judgment is typically introduced as an external intervention rather than a native precondition to execution. This work does not propose a new decision-making algorithm or safety heuristic, but identifies a missing structural role in contemporary AI and control architectures. This paper identifies this absence as a missing Judgment Root Node and proposes LERA (Judgment-Governance Architecture) , a structural framework that enforces judgment as a mandatory, non-bypassable prerequisite for execution. LERA is founded on two axioms: (1) execution is not a matter of system capability, but of structural permission, and (2) execution is not the chronological successor of judgment, but its structural consequence. Together, these axioms decouple execution legitimacy from computational capacity and bind it to judgment completion through a governance gate. LERA does not aim to optimize decisions or automate judgment. Instead, it institutionalizes judgment as a first-class architectural component, ensuring that execution authority remains accountable. By reinstating judgment at the execution boundary, LERA establishes a foundational architecture for judgment-governed automation.

Related papers

• Value-Preserving Architectures for Agentic AI Systems [44.64398176188818]
  The paper argues that architectural choices influence not only the functionality and performance of MAS but can also promote value-oriented system behavior.<n>We discuss the following value-preserving architectural patterns: (i) a privacy-aware architecture with a federated topology, (ii) a distributed architecture to promote pluralism and diversity, and (iii) a guard-agent architecture to detect and mitigate unfairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T14:36:23Z)
• Dual Process Motion Planning [53.570848178455776]
  We introduce a dual-process architecture that combines the strengths of robust reasoning and learning.<n>Our framework integrates state-of-the-art symbolic solvers as a System-2'' component with experience-driven System-1'' modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T13:52:12Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• Beyond Model Readiness: Institutional Readiness for AI Deployment in Public Systems [0.0]
  Many public-sector artificial intelligence systems fail not at the point of model development, but at the point of deployment.<n>Existing responsible AI and model evaluation frameworks are valuable, but they primarily assess models, datasets, and developer-side processes.<n>We introduce Institutional Alignment Readiness (IAR), a five-dimensional framework for assessing deployment readiness in public systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T00:11:09Z)
• Operationalizing Reconstructive Authority: Runtime Construction, Dependency Resolution, and Execution Gating in Autonomous Agent Systems [0.4929694290403903]
  We introduce a runtime execution model in which authority is evaluated at action time and execution is conditioned on its constructibility.<n>We show that this model guarantees safety -- no action is executed without constructible authority -- and conditional liveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T13:32:09Z)
• Atomic Decision Boundaries: A Structural Requirement for Guaranteeing Execution-Time Admissibility in Autonomous Systems [0.4929694290403903]
  We introduce the atomic decision boundary, a structural property of admission control systems.<n>We distinguish two classes: atomic systems and split evaluation systems.<n>We prove via a counterexample trace that no construction can make a split system equivalent to an atomic system with respect to admissibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T16:03:47Z)
• Governed Reasoning for Institutional AI [0.0]
  Cognitive Core is a governed decision substrate built from nine typed cognitive primitives.<n>Human review is a condition of execution rather than a post-hoc check.<n>We benchmark three systems on an 11-case balanced prior authorization appeal evaluation set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T14:09:18Z)
• When Should a Robot Think? Resource-Aware Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Embodied Robotic Decision-Making [68.12864562049957]
  Embodied robotic systems increasingly rely on large language model (LLM)-based agents to support high-level reasoning.<n>This raises a fundamental question for embodied agents: when should the agent reason, and when should it act?<n>We propose RARRL (Resource-Aware Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning), a hierarchical framework for resource-aware orchestration of embodied agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T15:38:50Z)
• Agency and Architectural Limits: Why Optimization-Based Systems Cannot Be Norm-Responsive [0.0]
  AI systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes contexts under the assumption they can be governed by norms.<n>This paper demonstrates that the assumption is formally invalid for optimization-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T17:16:17Z)
• Robust and Efficient Tool Orchestration via Layered Execution Structures with Reflective Correction [55.13278005189741]
  We model tool orchestration as learning a layered execution structure that captures high-level tool dependencies.<n>We introduce a schema-aware reflective correction mechanism that detects and repairs errors locally.<n>This design confines errors to individual tool calls and avoids re-planning entire execution trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-21T22:20:01Z)
• Towards Selection as Power: Bounding Decision Authority in Autonomous Agents [0.0]
  We propose a governance architecture that separates cognition, selection, and action into distinct domains and models autonomy as a vector of sovereignty.<n>We evaluate the system across multiple regulated financial scenarios under adversarial stress targeting variance manipulation, threshold gaming, framing skew, ordering effects, and entropy probing.<n>Results show that mechanical selection governance is implementable, auditable, and prevents deterministic outcome capture while preserving reasoning capacity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T10:10:47Z)
• Reliable Hierarchical Operating System Fingerprinting via Conformal Prediction [62.40452053128524]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) could be wrapped around existing methods to obtain prediction sets with guaranteed coverage.<n>This work addresses these limitations by introducing and evaluating two distinct structured CP strategies.<n>While both methods satisfy validity guarantees, they expose a fundamental trade-off between level-wise efficiency and structural consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T11:20:48Z)
• Agentic AI for Cybersecurity: A Meta-Cognitive Architecture for Governable Autonomy [0.0]
  This paper argues that cybersecurity orchestration should be reconceptualized as an agentic, multi-agent cognitive system.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework in which heterogeneous AI agents responsible for detection, hypothesis formation, contextual interpretation, explanation, and governance are coordinated through an explicit meta-cognitive judgement function.<n>Our contribution is to make this cognitive structure architecturally explicit and governable by embedding meta-cognitive judgement as a first-class system function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T12:52:49Z)
• Assured Autonomy: How Operations Research Powers and Orchestrates Generative AI Systems [18.881800772626427]
  We argue generative models can be fragile in operational domains unless paired with mechanisms that provide feasibility, robustness to distribution shift, and stress testing.<n>We develop a conceptual framework for assured autonomy grounded in operations research.<n>These elements define a research agenda for assured autonomy in safety-critical, reliability-sensitive operational domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T04:24:06Z)
• The Social Responsibility Stack: A Control-Theoretic Architecture for Governing Socio-Technical AI [0.0]
  This paper introduces the Social Responsibility Stack (SRS), a framework that embeds societal values into AI systems.<n>We show how SRS translates normative objectives into actionable engineering and operational controls.<n>The framework bridges ethics, control theory, and AI governance, providing a practical foundation for accountable, adaptive, and auditable socio-technical AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T18:42:16Z)
• From Linear Risk to Emergent Harm: Complexity as the Missing Core of AI Governance [0.0]
  Risk-based AI regulation promises proportional controls aligned with anticipated harms.<n>This paper argues that such frameworks often fail for structural reasons.<n>We propose a complexity-based framework for AI governance that treats regulation as intervention rather than control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T14:19:21Z)
• Making LLMs Reliable When It Matters Most: A Five-Layer Architecture for High-Stakes Decisions [51.56484100374058]
  Current large language models (LLMs) excel in verifiable domains where outputs can be checked before action but prove less reliable for high-stakes strategic decisions with uncertain outcomes.<n>This gap, driven by mutually cognitive biases in both humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, threatens the defensibility of valuations and sustainability of investments in the sector.<n>This report describes a framework emerging from systematic qualitative assessment across 7 frontier-grade LLMs and 3 market-facing venture vignettes under time pressure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T22:24:21Z)
• Deterministic Legal Agents: A Canonical Primitive API for Auditable Reasoning over Temporal Knowledge Graphs [0.0]
  This paper introduces a formal Primitive API designed as a secure execution layer for reasoning over temporal knowledge graphs.<n>Instead of a monolithic query engine, our framework provides a library of canonical primitives-atomic, composable, and auditable primitives.<n>This architecture transforms opaque retrieval into auditable reasoning, turning the agent's internal process from a black box into a verifiable log of deterministic primitives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T15:04:23Z)
• Explainable AI Systems Must Be Contestable: Here's How to Make It Happen [2.5875936082584623]
  This paper presents the first rigorous formal definition of contestability in explainable AI.<n>We introduce a modular framework of by-design and post-hoc mechanisms spanning human-centered interfaces, technical processes, and organizational architectures.<n>Our work equips practitioners with the tools to embed genuine recourse and accountability into AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T13:32:05Z)
• Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers [89.26889709510242]
  We argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently.<n>We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction.<n>This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T07:52:16Z)
• Control Illusion: The Failure of Instruction Hierarchies in Large Language Models [46.5792253691152]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed with hierarchical instruction schemes.<n>We introduce a systematic evaluation framework based on constraint prioritization to assess how well LLMs enforce instruction hierarchies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T04:51:37Z)
• Rational Decision-Making Agent with Internalized Utility Judgment [88.01612847081677]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable advancements and have attracted significant efforts to develop LLMs into agents capable of executing intricate multi-step decision-making tasks beyond traditional NLP applications.<n>This paper proposes RadAgent, which fosters the development of its rationality through an iterative framework involving Experience Exploration and Utility Learning.<n> Experimental results on the ToolBench dataset demonstrate RadAgent's superiority over baselines, achieving over 10% improvement in Pass Rate on diverse tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T03:11:45Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.