A Sustainable AI Economy Needs Data Deals That Work for Generators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09966v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 01:05:48 GMT
• Title: A Sustainable AI Economy Needs Data Deals That Work for Generators
• Authors: Ruoxi Jia, Luis Oala, Wenjie Xiong, Suqin Ge, Jiachen T. Wang, Feiyang Kang, Dawn Song,
• Abstract summary: We argue that the machine learning value chain is structurally unsustainable due to an economic data processing inequality.<n>We analyze 73 public data deals and show that the majority of value accrues to aggregators.<n>We propose an Equitable Data-Value Exchange Framework to enable a minimal market that benefits all participants.
• Score: 56.949279542190084
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We argue that the machine learning value chain is structurally unsustainable due to an economic data processing inequality: each state in the data cycle from inputs to model weights to synthetic outputs refines technical signal but strips economic equity from data generators. We show, by analyzing seventy-three public data deals, that the majority of value accrues to aggregators, with documented creator royalties rounding to zero and widespread opacity of deal terms. This is not just an economic welfare concern: as data and its derivatives become economic assets, the feedback loop that sustains current learning algorithms is at risk. We identify three structural faults - missing provenance, asymmetric bargaining power, and non-dynamic pricing - as the operational machinery of this inequality. In our analysis, we trace these problems along the machine learning value chain and propose an Equitable Data-Value Exchange (EDVEX) Framework to enable a minimal market that benefits all participants. Finally, we outline research directions where our community can make concrete contributions to data deals and contextualize our position with related and orthogonal viewpoints.

Related papers

• Measuring Privacy Risks and Tradeoffs in Financial Synthetic Data Generation [6.043442867001894]
  We consider the tradeoff between synthetic data generation schemes and privacy on financial datasets.<n>We provide novel privacy-preserving implementations of GAN and autoencoder synthesizers.<n>Our results offer insight into the challenges of generating synthetic data from datasets that exhibit severe class imbalance and mixed-type attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T00:14:19Z)
• The Economics of AI Training Data: A Research Agenda [0.4174557458129457]
  Despite data's central role in AI production, it remains the least understood input.<n>As AI labs exhaust public data and turn to proprietary sources, research across computer science, economics, law, and policy has fragmented.<n>We establish data economics as a coherent field through three contributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T21:37:35Z)
• The Economics of Information Pollution in the Age of AI: A General Equilibrium Approach to Welfare, Measurement, and Policy [4.887749221165767]
  The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) represents a fundamental shock to the economics of information production.<n>By asymmetrically collapsing the marginal cost of generating low-quality, synthetic content while leaving high-quality production costly, AI systematically incentivizes information pollution.<n>This paper develops a general equilibrium framework to analyze this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T06:31:17Z)
• Understanding the Influence of Synthetic Data for Text Embedders [52.04771455432998]
  We first reproduce and publicly release the synthetic data proposed by Wang et al.<n>We critically examine where exactly synthetic data improves model generalization.<n>Our findings highlight the limitations of current synthetic data approaches for building general-purpose embedders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T19:28:52Z)
• Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Models [12.85318938363753]
  We evaluate algorithms via the makeup of synthetic data generated by each algorithm in terms of data quality, diversity, and complexity.<n>We examine the effect of various components in the synthetic data pipeline on each data characteristic.<n>We argue that balancing these trade-offs is essential to the development of future self-improvement algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T02:47:45Z)
• A Novel Framework for Analyzing Structural Transformation in Data-Constrained Economies Using Bayesian Modeling and Machine Learning [0.0]
  The shift from agrarian economies to more diversified industrial and service-based systems is a key driver of economic development. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), data scarcity and unreliability hinder accurate assessments of this process. This paper presents a novel statistical framework designed to address these challenges by integrating Bayesian hierarchical modeling, machine learning-based data imputation, and factor analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T08:39:41Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• Mechanisms that Incentivize Data Sharing in Federated Learning [90.74337749137432]
  We show how a naive scheme leads to catastrophic levels of free-riding where the benefits of data sharing are completely eroded. We then introduce accuracy shaping based mechanisms to maximize the amount of data generated by each agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-10T22:36:52Z)
• Data Considerations in Graph Representation Learning for Supply Chain Networks [64.72135325074963]
  We present a graph representation learning approach to uncover hidden dependency links. We demonstrate that our representation facilitates state-of-the-art performance on link prediction of a global automotive supply chain network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T12:28:15Z)
• Data Sharing Markets [95.13209326119153]
  We study a setup where each agent can be both buyer and seller of data. We consider two cases: bilateral data exchange (trading data with data) and unilateral data exchange (trading data with money)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T06:00:34Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.