Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02980v2
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 22:23:41 GMT
- Title: Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Models
- Authors: Alex Havrilla, Andrew Dai, Laura O'Mahony, Koen Oostermeijer, Vera Zisler, Alon Albalak, Fabrizio Milo, Sharath Chandra Raparthy, Kanishk Gandhi, Baber Abbasi, Duy Phung, Maia Iyer, Dakota Mahan, Chase Blagden, Srishti Gureja, Mohammed Hamdy, Wen-Ding Li, Giovanni Paolini, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Elliot Meyerson,
- Abstract summary: We evaluate algorithms via the makeup of synthetic data generated by each algorithm in terms of data quality, diversity, and complexity.
We examine the effect of various components in the synthetic data pipeline on each data characteristic.
We argue that balancing these trade-offs is essential to the development of future self-improvement algorithms.
- Score: 12.85318938363753
- License:
- Abstract: Synthetic data generation with Large Language Models is a promising paradigm for augmenting natural data over a nearly infinite range of tasks. Given this variety, direct comparisons among synthetic data generation algorithms are scarce, making it difficult to understand where improvement comes from and what bottlenecks exist. We propose to evaluate algorithms via the makeup of synthetic data generated by each algorithm in terms of data quality, diversity, and complexity. We choose these three characteristics for their significance in open-ended processes and the impact each has on the capabilities of downstream models. We find quality to be essential for in-distribution model generalization, diversity to be essential for out-of-distribution generalization, and complexity to be beneficial for both. Further, we emphasize the existence of Quality-Diversity trade-offs in training data and the downstream effects on model performance. We then examine the effect of various components in the synthetic data pipeline on each data characteristic. This examination allows us to taxonomize and compare synthetic data generation algorithms through the components they utilize and the resulting effects on data QDC composition. This analysis extends into a discussion on the importance of balancing QDC in synthetic data for efficient reinforcement learning and self-improvement algorithms. Analogous to the QD trade-offs in training data, often there exist trade-offs between model output quality and output diversity which impact the composition of synthetic data. We observe that many models are currently evaluated and optimized only for output quality, thereby limiting output diversity and the potential for self-improvement. We argue that balancing these trade-offs is essential to the development of future self-improvement algorithms and highlight a number of works making progress in this direction.
Related papers
- On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models [34.00031258223175]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have accentuated the need for diverse, high-quality pre-training data.
Synthetic data emerges as a viable solution to the challenges of data scarcity and inaccessibility.
We study the downstream effects of synthetic data diversity during both the pre-training and fine-tuning stages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T22:14:07Z) - Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs)
Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws.
Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z) - Curating Grounded Synthetic Data with Global Perspectives for Equitable AI [0.5120567378386615]
We introduce a novel approach to creating synthetic datasets, grounded in real-world diversity and enriched through strategic diversification.
We synthesize data using a comprehensive collection of news articles spanning 12 languages and originating from 125 countries, to ensure a breadth of linguistic and cultural representations.
Preliminary results demonstrate substantial improvements in performance on traditional NER benchmarks, by up to 7.3%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T17:59:11Z) - Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data [83.63271573197026]
The success of AI models relies on the availability of large, diverse, and high-quality datasets.
Synthetic data has emerged as a promising solution by generating artificial data that mimics real-world patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T06:34:17Z) - Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A
Comprehensive Benchmark [56.8042116967334]
Synthetic data serves as an alternative in training machine learning models.
ensuring that synthetic data mirrors the complex nuances of real-world data is a challenging task.
This paper explores the potential of integrating data-centric AI techniques to guide the synthetic data generation process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T20:32:02Z) - Does Synthetic Data Make Large Language Models More Efficient? [0.0]
This paper explores the nuances of synthetic data generation in NLP.
We highlight its advantages, including data augmentation potential and the introduction of structured variety.
We demonstrate the impact of template-based synthetic data on the performance of modern transformer models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T19:16:09Z) - Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task.
We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z) - Analyzing Effects of Fake Training Data on the Performance of Deep
Learning Systems [0.0]
Deep learning models frequently suffer from various problems such as class imbalance and lack of robustness to distribution shift.
With the advent of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) it is now possible to generate high-quality synthetic data.
We analyze the effect that various quantities of synthetic data, when mixed with original data, can have on a model's robustness to out-of-distribution data and the general quality of predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T13:53:22Z) - An Empirical Investigation of Commonsense Self-Supervision with
Knowledge Graphs [67.23285413610243]
Self-supervision based on the information extracted from large knowledge graphs has been shown to improve the generalization of language models.
We study the effect of knowledge sampling strategies and sizes that can be used to generate synthetic data for adapting language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-21T19:49:04Z) - CAFE: Learning to Condense Dataset by Aligning Features [72.99394941348757]
We propose a novel scheme to Condense dataset by Aligning FEatures (CAFE)
At the heart of our approach is an effective strategy to align features from the real and synthetic data across various scales.
We validate the proposed CAFE across various datasets, and demonstrate that it generally outperforms the state of the art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T05:58:49Z) - Transitioning from Real to Synthetic data: Quantifying the bias in model [1.6134566438137665]
This study aims to establish a trade-off between bias and fairness in the models trained using synthetic data.
We demonstrate there exist a varying levels of bias impact on models trained using synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T06:57:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.