Matrix as Plan: Structured Logical Reasoning with Feedback-Driven Replanning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10101v2
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 09:34:40 GMT
• Title: Matrix as Plan: Structured Logical Reasoning with Feedback-Driven Replanning
• Authors: Ke Chen, Jiandian Zeng, Zihao Peng, Guo Li, Guangxue Zhang, Tian Wang,
• Abstract summary: Chain-of-Thought prompting has been shown to enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Neuro-symbolic methods address this gap by enforcing formal correctness through external solvers.<n>We propose MatrixCoT, a structured CoT framework with a matrix-based plan.
• Score: 9.431480849387595
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As knowledge and semantics on the web grow increasingly complex, enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs)' comprehension and reasoning capabilities has become particularly important. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. However, it still falls short on logical reasoning tasks that rely on symbolic expressions and strict deductive rules. Neuro-symbolic methods address this gap by enforcing formal correctness through external solvers. Yet these solvers are highly format-sensitive, and small instabilities in model outputs can lead to frequent processing failures. The LLM-driven approaches avoid parsing brittleness, but they lack structured representations and process-level error-correction mechanisms. To further enhance the logical reasoning capabilities of LLMs, we propose MatrixCoT, a structured CoT framework with a matrix-based plan. Specifically, we normalize and type natural language expressions and attach explicit citation fields, and introduce a matrix-based planning method to preserve global relations among steps. The plan thus becomes a verifiable artifact and execution becomes more stable. For verification, we also add a feedback-driven replanning mechanism. Under semantic-equivalence constraints, it identifies omissions and defects, rewrites and compresses the dependency matrix, and produces a more trustworthy final answer. Experiments on five logical-reasoning benchmarks and five LLMs show that, without relying on external solvers, MatrixCoT enhances both the robustness and interpretability of LLMs when tackling complex symbolic reasoning tasks, while maintaining competitive performance.

Related papers

• Last Layer Logits to Logic: Empowering LLMs with Logic-Consistent Structured Knowledge Reasoning [55.55968342644846]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve excellent performance in natural language reasoning tasks through pre-training on vast unstructured text.<n>We propose the textitLogits-to-Logic framework, which incorporates logits strengthening and logits filtering as core modules to correct logical defects in LLM outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T07:08:27Z)
• Making Mathematical Reasoning Adaptive [61.45161826629692]
  We propose the AdaR framework to enable adaptive reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>AdaR synthesizes logically equivalent queries by varying variable values, and trains models with RLVR on these data to penalize spurious logic.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AdaR improves robustness and generalization, achieving substantial improvement in mathematical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T09:30:05Z)
• Implicit Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey [67.53966514728383]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generalization across a wide range of tasks.<n>Recent studies have shifted attention from explicit chain-of-thought prompting toward implicit reasoning.<n>This survey introduces a taxonomy centered on execution paradigms, shifting the focus from representational forms to computational strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T14:16:02Z)
• Do LLMs Dream of Discrete Algorithms? [0.7646713951724011]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly transformed the landscape of artificial intelligence.<n>Their reliance on probabilistic inference limits their effectiveness in domains requiring strict logical reasoning.<n>This paper proposes a neurosymbolic approach that augments LLMs with logic-based reasoning modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T22:03:01Z)
• LLM-Symbolic Integration for Robust Temporal Tabular Reasoning [69.27153114778748]
  We introduce TempTabQA-C, a synthetic dataset designed for systematic and controlled evaluations.<n>This structured approach allows Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate and executesql queries, enhancing generalization and mitigating biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T05:14:04Z)
• Computational Thinking Reasoning in Large Language Models [69.28428524878885]
  Computational Thinking Model (CTM) is a novel framework that incorporates computational thinking paradigms into large language models (LLMs)<n>Live code execution is seamlessly integrated into the reasoning process, allowing CTM to think by computing.<n>CTM outperforms conventional reasoning models and tool-augmented baselines in terms of accuracy, interpretability, and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:11:15Z)
• CRANE: Reasoning with constrained LLM generation [16.123698230193202]
  We propose a reasoning-augmented constrained decoding algorithm, CRANE, which balances correctness of constrained generation with flexibility of unconstrained generation.<n> CRANE significantly outperforms both state-of-the-art constrained decoding strategies and standard unconstrained decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T08:23:42Z)
• Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models [62.799579304821826]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making. Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and other code-adjacent techniques to improve planning performance. We propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive and dynamic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T04:23:17Z)
• Reversal of Thought: Enhancing Large Language Models with Preference-Guided Reverse Reasoning Warm-up [9.42385235462794]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in reasoning tasks but face limitations in mathematical and complex logical reasoning.<n>We propose Reversal of Thought (RoT) to enhance the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs during the warm-up phase prior to batch inference.<n>RoT utilizes a Preference-Guided Reverse Reasoning warm-up strategy, which integrates logical symbols for pseudocode planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:44:28Z)
• Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning [1.3003982724617653]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet they struggle with inconsistent reasoning. This research introduces Proof of Thought, a framework that enhances the reliability and transparency of LLM outputs. Key contributions include a robust type system with sort management for enhanced logical integrity, explicit representation of rules for clear distinction between factual and inferential knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T18:35:45Z)
• Unlocking Reasoning Potential in Large Langauge Models by Scaling Code-form Planning [94.76546523689113]
  We introduce CodePlan, a framework that generates and follows textcode-form plans -- pseudocode that outlines high-level, structured reasoning processes. CodePlan effectively captures the rich semantics and control flows inherent to sophisticated reasoning tasks. It achieves a 25.1% relative improvement compared with directly generating responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T04:13:58Z)
• SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting [68.40726892904286]
  We propose a new satisfiability-aided language modeling (SatLM) approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We use an LLM to generate a declarative task specification rather than an imperative program and leverage an off-the-shelf automated theorem prover to derive the final answer. We evaluate SATLM on 8 different datasets and show that it consistently outperforms program-aided LMs in the imperative paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:55:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.