Detecting Winning Arguments with Large Language Models and Persuasion Strategies
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10660v1
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:30:15 GMT
- Title: Detecting Winning Arguments with Large Language Models and Persuasion Strategies
- Authors: Tiziano Labruna, Arkadiusz Modzelewski, Giorgio Satta, Giovanni Da San Martino,
- Abstract summary: This work investigates the role of persuasion strategies in determining the persuasiveness of a text.<n>We conduct experiments on three annotated argument datasets: Winning Arguments (built from the Change My View subreddit), Anthropic/Persuasion, and Persuasion for Good.<n>Results show that strategy-guided reasoning improves the prediction of persuasiveness.
- Score: 7.089321248525487
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Detecting persuasion in argumentative text is a challenging task with important implications for understanding human communication. This work investigates the role of persuasion strategies - such as Attack on reputation, Distraction, and Manipulative wording - in determining the persuasiveness of a text. We conduct experiments on three annotated argument datasets: Winning Arguments (built from the Change My View subreddit), Anthropic/Persuasion, and Persuasion for Good. Our approach leverages large language models (LLMs) with a Multi-Strategy Persuasion Scoring approach that guides reasoning over six persuasion strategies. Results show that strategy-guided reasoning improves the prediction of persuasiveness. To better understand the influence of content, we organize the Winning Argument dataset into broad discussion topics and analyze performance across them. We publicly release this topic-annotated version of the dataset to facilitate future research. Overall, our methodology demonstrates the value of structured, strategy-aware prompting for enhancing interpretability and robustness in argument quality assessment.
Related papers
- SAD: A Large-Scale Strategic Argumentative Dialogue Dataset [60.33125467375306]
In practice, argumentation is often realized as multi-turn dialogue.<n>We present the first large-scale textbfStrategic textbfArgumentative textbfDialogue dataset, consisting of 392,822 examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T11:11:37Z) - MMPersuade: A Dataset and Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Persuasion [73.99171322670772]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly deployed in domains such as shopping, health, and news.<n> MMPersuade provides a unified framework for systematically studying multimodal persuasion dynamics in LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-26T17:39:21Z) - How Persuasive Could LLMs Be? A First Study Combining Linguistic-Rhetorical Analysis and User Experiments [1.1277995582894218]
The study finds that while participants often acknowledge the benefits highlighted by ChatGPT, ethical concerns tend to persist or even intensify post-interaction.<n>These findings highlight new insights on AI-generated persuasion in ethically sensitive domains and are a basis for future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T08:45:04Z) - Must Read: A Systematic Survey of Computational Persuasion [60.83151988635103]
AI-driven persuasion can be leveraged for beneficial applications, but also poses threats through manipulation and unethical influence.<n>Our survey outlines future research directions to enhance the safety, fairness, and effectiveness of AI-powered persuasion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T17:26:31Z) - AutoPersuade: A Framework for Evaluating and Explaining Persuasive Arguments [0.5242869847419834]
We introduce AutoPersuade, a framework for constructing persuasive messages.<n>We develop a novel topic model to identify argument features that influence persuasiveness.<n>We use this model to predict the effectiveness of new arguments and assess the causal impact of different components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T15:46:05Z) - Persuasion Strategies in Advertisements [68.70313043201882]
We introduce an extensive vocabulary of persuasion strategies and build the first ad image corpus annotated with persuasion strategies.
We then formulate the task of persuasion strategy prediction with multi-modal learning.
We conduct a real-world case study on 1600 advertising campaigns of 30 Fortune-500 companies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-20T07:33:13Z) - Persua: A Visual Interactive System to Enhance the Persuasiveness of
Arguments in Online Discussion [52.49981085431061]
Enhancing people's ability to write persuasive arguments could contribute to the effectiveness and civility in online communication.
We derived four design goals for a tool that helps users improve the persuasiveness of arguments in online discussions.
Persua is an interactive visual system that provides example-based guidance on persuasive strategies to enhance the persuasiveness of arguments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-16T08:07:53Z) - Towards Understanding Persuasion in Computational Argumentation [10.089382889894246]
Opinion formation and persuasion in argumentation are affected by three major factors: the argument itself, the source of the argument, and the properties of the audience.
This thesis makes several contributions to understand the relative effect of the source, audience, and language in computational persuasion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-03T19:36:21Z) - Examining the Ordering of Rhetorical Strategies in Persuasive Requests [58.63432866432461]
We use a Variational Autoencoder model to disentangle content and rhetorical strategies in textual requests from a large-scale loan request corpus.
We find that specific (orderings of) strategies interact uniquely with a request's content to impact success rate, and thus the persuasiveness of a request.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-09T15:10:44Z) - What Changed Your Mind: The Roles of Dynamic Topics and Discourse in
Argumentation Process [78.4766663287415]
This paper presents a study that automatically analyzes the key factors in argument persuasiveness.
We propose a novel neural model that is able to track the changes of latent topics and discourse in argumentative conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T04:27:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.