A Concise Agent is Less Expert: Revealing Side Effects of Using Style Features on Conversational Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10809v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:18:18 GMT
• Title: A Concise Agent is Less Expert: Revealing Side Effects of Using Style Features on Conversational Agents
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic study of cross-feature stylistic side effects.<n>We quantify how prompting for one style feature causally affects others via a pairwise Large Language Model evaluation framework.<n>Our results reveal consistent and structured side effects, such as prompting for conciseness significantly reduces perceived expertise.
• Score: 14.1714863221125
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Style features such as friendly, helpful, or concise are widely used in prompts to steer the behavior of Large Language Model (LLM) conversational agents, yet their unintended side effects remain poorly understood. In this work, we present the first systematic study of cross-feature stylistic side effects. We conduct a comprehensive survey of 127 conversational agent papers from ACL Anthology and identify 12 frequently used style features. Using controlled, synthetic dialogues across task-oriented and open domain settings, we quantify how prompting for one style feature causally affects others via a pairwise LLM as a Judge evaluation framework. Our results reveal consistent and structured side effects, such as prompting for conciseness significantly reduces perceived expertise. They demonstrate that style features are deeply entangled rather than orthogonal. To support future research, we introduce CASSE (Conversational Agent Stylistic Side Effects), a dataset capturing these complex interactions. We further evaluate prompt based and activation steering based mitigation strategies and find that while they can partially restore suppressed traits, they often degrade the primary intended style. These findings challenge the assumption of faithful style control in LLMs and highlight the need for multi-objective and more principled approaches to safe, targeted stylistic steering in conversational agents.

Related papers

• From Profiling to Synthesis: Benchmarking Implicit Behavioral Alignment in Personalized LLM Agents [56.187590188698955]
  Large Language Models have enabled increasingly capable autonomous agents, yet personalization remains critical for making such agents practically useful.<n>Recent benchmarks have begun evaluating personalization in agents, but they largely rely on static preference snapshots, fixed interaction logs, or question answering over predefined user profiles.<n>We introduce IBA-Bench, a benchmark for implicit behavioral alignment constructed from longitudinal interaction histories.<n>We propose IBA-Agent, an agent framework that reconciles conflicting priorities through broad retrieval and trajectory-level alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T12:52:04Z)
• A Low-Latency Fraud Detection Layer for Detecting Adversarial Interaction Patterns in LLM-Powered Agents [18.524016493711386]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-powered agents demonstrate strong capabilities in autonomous task execution, tool use, and multi-step reasoning.<n> adversarial interactions can manipulate agent behavior through direct prompt injection, indirect content attacks, and multi-turn escalation strategies.<n>We propose a low-latency fraud detection layer for detecting adversarial interaction patterns in LLM-powered agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T22:35:59Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• Are All Prompt Components Value-Neutral? Understanding the Heterogeneous Adversarial Robustness of Dissected Prompt in Large Language Models [11.625319498017733]
  We introduce PromptAnatomy, an automated framework that dissects prompts into functional components.<n>We generate adversarial examples by selectively perturbing each component using our proposed method, ComPerturb.<n>As a complementary resource, we annotate four public instruction-tuning datasets using the PromptAnatomy framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T02:46:30Z)
• MIRAGE-Bench: LLM Agent is Hallucinating and Where to Find Them [52.764019220214344]
  Hallucinations pose critical risks for large language model (LLM)-based agents.<n>We present MIRAGE-Bench, the first unified benchmark for eliciting and evaluating hallucinations in interactive environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:38:29Z)
• Abstract Counterfactuals for Language Model Agents [3.7540612510652176]
  Abstract Counterfactuals is a framework that emphasises high-level characteristics of actions and interactions within an environment.<n>We conduct experiments on text-based games and counterfactual text generation, while considering both token-level and latent-space interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T14:44:26Z)
• Should We Tailor the Talk? Understanding the Impact of Conversational Styles on Preference Elicitation in Conversational Recommender Systems [19.830560938115436]
  This study investigates the impact of different conversational styles on preference elicitation, task performance, and user satisfaction with Conversational recommender systems (CRSs)<n>Our results indicate that adapting conversational strategies based on user expertise and allowing flexibility between styles can enhance both user satisfaction and the effectiveness of recommendations in CRSs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:01:17Z)
• Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Conversational Recommender Systems: A Simulation with Large Language Models [70.180385882195]
  This paper introduces a personality-aware user simulation for Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs)<n>The user agent induces customizable personality traits and preferences, while the system agent possesses the persuasion capability to simulate realistic interaction in CRSs.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art LLMs can effectively generate diverse user responses aligned with specified personality traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T13:21:17Z)
• SHARP: Unlocking Interactive Hallucination via Stance Transfer in Role-Playing LLMs [12.990119925990477]
  We introduce a generalizable and explicit paradigm for uncovering interactive patterns of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We first define interactive hallucination through stance transfer, then construct SHARP, a benchmark built by extracting relations from commonsense knowledge graphs.<n> Extensive experiments confirm our paradigm's effectiveness and stability, examine the factors that influence these metrics, and challenge conventional hallucination mitigation solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T17:41:16Z)
• RoleBreak: Character Hallucination as a Jailbreak Attack in Role-Playing Systems [20.786294377706717]
  Role-playing systems powered by large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly influential in emotional communication applications. These systems are susceptible to character hallucinations, where the model deviates from predefined character roles and generates responses that are inconsistent with the intended persona. This paper presents the first systematic analysis of character hallucination from an attack perspective, introducing the RoleBreak framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T08:23:46Z)
• Improving Zero-Shot ObjectNav with Generative Communication [60.84730028539513]
  We propose a new method for improving zero-shot ObjectNav. Our approach takes into account that the ground agent may have limited and sometimes obstructed view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T22:55:26Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• Enhancing HOI Detection with Contextual Cues from Large Vision-Language Models [56.257840490146]
  ConCue is a novel approach for improving visual feature extraction in HOI detection. We develop a transformer-based feature extraction module with a multi-tower architecture that integrates contextual cues into both instance and interaction detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-26T09:11:32Z)
• Re-mine, Learn and Reason: Exploring the Cross-modal Semantic Correlations for Language-guided HOI detection [57.13665112065285]
  Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is a challenging computer vision task. We present a framework that enhances HOI detection by incorporating structured text knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T14:20:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.