Selecting Language Models for Social Science: Start Small, Start Open, and Validate
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10926v1
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 01:01:47 GMT
- Title: Selecting Language Models for Social Science: Start Small, Start Open, and Validate
- Authors: Dustin S. Stoltz, Marshall A. Taylor, Sanuj Kumar,
- Abstract summary: We argue that social scientists cannot altogether avoid validating computational measures (ex-post)<n>Being able to reliably replicate a particular finding that entails the use of a language model requires reliably reproducing a task.<n>We propose starting with smaller, open models, and constructing benchmarks to demonstrate the validity of the entire computational pipeline.
- Score: 0.3823356975862005
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Currently, there are thousands of large pretrained language models (LLMs) available to social scientists. How do we select among them? Using validity, reliability, reproducibility, and replicability as guides, we explore the significance of: (1) model openness, (2) model footprint, (3) training data, and (4) model architectures and fine-tuning. While ex-ante tests of validity (i.e., benchmarks) are often privileged in these discussions, we argue that social scientists cannot altogether avoid validating computational measures (ex-post). Replicability, in particular, is a more pressing guide for selecting language models. Being able to reliably replicate a particular finding that entails the use of a language model necessitates reliably reproducing a task. To this end, we propose starting with smaller, open models, and constructing delimited benchmarks to demonstrate the validity of the entire computational pipeline.
Related papers
- Pretraining Language Models to Ponder in Continuous Space [50.52734567589996]
We introduce this pondering process into language models by repeatedly invoking the forward process within a single token generation step.<n>We show that the model can learn to ponder in this way through self-supervised learning, without any human annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T03:47:33Z) - Improving Arithmetic Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models through Relation Tuples, Verification and Dynamic Feedback [14.938401898546553]
We propose to use a semi-structured form to represent reasoning steps of large language models.
Specifically, we use relations, which are not only human but also machine-friendly and easier to verify than natural language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T18:21:00Z) - Fine-tuning Language Models for Factuality [96.5203774943198]
Large pre-trained language models (LLMs) have led to their widespread use, sometimes even as a replacement for traditional search engines.
Yet language models are prone to making convincing but factually inaccurate claims, often referred to as 'hallucinations'
In this work, we fine-tune language models to be more factual, without human labeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T18:59:15Z) - A novel approach to measuring the scope of patent claims based on probabilities obtained from (large) language models [0.0]
This work proposes to measure the scope of a patent claim as the reciprocal of self-information contained in this claim.
The more surprising the information required to define the claim, the narrower its scope.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-17T16:50:07Z) - Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision [72.95136739040676]
Existing techniques for training language models can be misaligned with the truth.
We propose directly finding latent knowledge inside the internal activations of a language model in a purely unsupervised way.
We show that despite using no supervision and no model outputs, our method can recover diverse knowledge represented in large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-07T18:17:56Z) - Bidirectional Language Models Are Also Few-shot Learners [54.37445173284831]
We present SAP (Sequential Autoregressive Prompting), a technique that enables the prompting of bidirectional models.
We show SAP is effective on question answering and summarization.
For the first time, our results demonstrate prompt-based learning is an emergent property of a broader class of language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-29T01:35:57Z) - Few-shot Prompting Towards Controllable Response Generation [49.479958672988566]
We first explored the combination of prompting and reinforcement learning (RL) to steer models' generation without accessing any of the models' parameters.
We apply multi-task learning to make the model learn to generalize to new tasks better.
Experiment results show that our proposed method can successfully control several state-of-the-art (SOTA) dialogue models without accessing their parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T14:48:06Z) - Super-Prompting: Utilizing Model-Independent Contextual Data to Reduce
Data Annotation Required in Visual Commonsense Tasks [3.42658286826597]
We analyze different prompt-based fine-tuning techniques to improve results on both language and multimodal causal transformer models.
Our results show that by simple model-agnostic prompt-based fine-tuning, comparable results can be reached by only using 35%-40% of the fine-tuning training dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-25T18:56:55Z) - An Application of Pseudo-Log-Likelihoods to Natural Language Scoring [5.382454613390483]
A language model with relatively few parameters and training steps can outperform it on a recent large data set.
We produce some absolute state-of-the-art results for common sense reasoning in binary choice tasks.
We argue that robustness of the smaller model ought to be understood in terms of compositionality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-23T22:00:54Z) - Read Like Humans: Autonomous, Bidirectional and Iterative Language
Modeling for Scene Text Recognition [80.446770909975]
Linguistic knowledge is of great benefit to scene text recognition.
How to effectively model linguistic rules in end-to-end deep networks remains a research challenge.
We propose an autonomous, bidirectional and iterative ABINet for scene text recognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-11T06:47:45Z) - Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for
Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict.
This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data.
Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.