ZPD Detector: Data Selection via Capability-Difficulty Alignment for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10986v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 04:23:10 GMT
• Title: ZPD Detector: Data Selection via Capability-Difficulty Alignment for Large Language Models
• Authors: Bo Yang, Yunkui Chen, Lanfei Feng, Yu Zhang, Shijian Li,
• Abstract summary: We propose ZPD Detector, a data selection framework that adopts a bidirectional perspective between models and data.<n>ZPD Detector integrates difficulty calibration, model capability estimation based on Item Response Theory (IRTy), and a capability-difficult matching score to dynamically identify the most informative samples.
• Score: 9.072905469784951
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As the cost of training large language models continues to increase and high-quality training data become increasingly scarce, selecting high-value samples or synthesizing effective training data under limited data budgets has emerged as a critical research problem. Most existing data selection methods rely on static criteria, such as difficulty, uncertainty, or heuristics, and fail to model the evolving relationship between the model and the data. Inspired by the educational theory of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), we propose ZPD Detector, a data selection framework that adopts a bidirectional perspective between models and data by explicitly modeling the alignment between sample difficulty and the model's current capability. ZPD Detector integrates difficulty calibration, model capability estimation based on Item Response Theory (IRT), and a capability-difficulty matching score to dynamically identify the most informative samples at each learning stage, improving data utilization efficiency; moreover, this dynamic matching strategy provides new insights into training strategy design. All code and data will be released after our work be accepted to support reproducible researc

Related papers

• Statistical Comparative Analysis of Semantic Similarities and Model Transferability Across Datasets for Short Answer Grading [3.7723788828505125]
  This study investigates the transferability of state-of-the-art (SOTA) models trained on established datasets to an unexplored text dataset.<n>The primary goal of this work is to yield comprehensive insights into the potential applicability and adaptability of SOTA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T05:45:02Z)
• SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z)
• LLM Data Selection and Utilization via Dynamic Bi-level Optimization [100.20933466418786]
  We propose a new Data Weighting Model (DWM) to adjust the weight of selected data within each batch to achieve a dynamic data utilization during training.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that DWM enhances the performance of models trained with randomly-selected data.<n>We further analyze how a model's data preferences evolve throughout training, providing new insights into the data preference of the model during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T02:47:12Z)
• RL-Selector: Reinforcement Learning-Guided Data Selection via Redundancy Assessment [10.284993431741377]
  We introduce the concept of epsilon-sample cover, which quantifies sample redundancy based on inter-sample relationships.<n>We reformulate data selection as a reinforcement learning process and propose RL-Selector.<n>Our method consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T06:28:56Z)
• Less is More: Adaptive Coverage for Synthetic Training Data [20.136698279893857]
  This study introduces a novel sampling algorithm, based on the maximum coverage problem, to select a representative subset from a synthetically generated dataset.<n>Our results demonstrate that training a classifier on this contextually sampled subset achieves superior performance compared to training on the entire dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T06:45:16Z)
• AdvKT: An Adversarial Multi-Step Training Framework for Knowledge Tracing [64.79967583649407]
  Knowledge Tracing (KT) monitors students' knowledge states and simulates their responses to question sequences.<n>Existing KT models typically follow a single-step training paradigm, which leads to significant error accumulation.<n>We propose a novel Adversarial Multi-Step Training Framework for Knowledge Tracing (AdvKT) which focuses on the multi-step KT task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:31:57Z)
• Enhancing Few-Shot Learning with Integrated Data and GAN Model Approaches [35.431340001608476]
  This paper presents an innovative approach to enhancing few-shot learning by integrating data augmentation with model fine-tuning. It aims to tackle the challenges posed by small-sample data in fields such as drug discovery, target recognition, and malicious traffic detection. Results confirm that the MhERGAN algorithm developed in this research is highly effective for few-shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T16:51:11Z)
• Take the essence and discard the dross: A Rethinking on Data Selection for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models [36.22392593103493]
  Data selection for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) aims to choose a high-quality subset from existing datasets.<n>Existing surveys overlook an in-depth exploration of the fine-tuning phase.<n>We introduce a novel three-stage scheme - comprising feature extraction, criteria design, and selector evaluation - to systematically categorize and evaluate these methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T08:58:58Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• D2 Pruning: Message Passing for Balancing Diversity and Difficulty in Data Pruning [70.98091101459421]
  Coreset selection seeks to select a subset of the training data so as to maximize the performance of models trained on this subset, also referred to as coreset. We propose a novel pruning algorithm, D2 Pruning, that uses forward and reverse message passing over this dataset graph for coreset selection. Results show that D2 Pruning improves coreset selection over previous state-of-the-art methods for up to 70% pruning rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T23:01:29Z)
• Tackling Diverse Minorities in Imbalanced Classification [80.78227787608714]
  Imbalanced datasets are commonly observed in various real-world applications, presenting significant challenges in training classifiers. We propose generating synthetic samples iteratively by mixing data samples from both minority and majority classes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework through extensive experiments conducted on seven publicly available benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T18:48:34Z)
• RLBoost: Boosting Supervised Models using Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We present RLBoost, an algorithm that uses deep reinforcement learning strategies to evaluate a particular dataset and obtain a model capable of estimating the quality of any new data. The results of the article show that this model obtains better and more stable results than other state-of-the-art algorithms such as LOO, DataShapley or DVRL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T14:38:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.