Patterns of Bot Participation and Emotional Influence in Open-Source Development
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11138v1
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:58:28 GMT
- Title: Patterns of Bot Participation and Emotional Influence in Open-Source Development
- Abstract summary: We study how bots contribute to open-source discussions in the ecosystem.<n>Human participation follows a U-shaped pattern, while bots engage in uniform (pull requests) or late-stage (issues) activity.<n>Using a model trained on 27 emotion categories, we find bots are more neutral, yet their interventions are followed by reduced neutrality in human comments.
- Score: 1.037389180476138
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We study how bots contribute to open-source discussions in the Ethereum ecosystem and whether they influence developers' emotional tone. Our dataset covers 36,875 accounts across ten repositories with 105 validated bots (0.28%). Human participation follows a U-shaped pattern, while bots engage in uniform (pull requests) or late-stage (issues) activity. Bots respond faster than humans in pull requests but play slower maintenance roles in issues. Using a model trained on 27 emotion categories, we find bots are more neutral, yet their interventions are followed by reduced neutrality in human comments, with shifts toward gratitude, admiration, and optimism and away from confusion. These findings indicate that even a small number of bots are associated with changes in both timing and emotional dynamics of developer communication.
Related papers
- What is a Social Media Bot? A Global Comparison of Bot and Human Characteristics [5.494111035517598]
Bots tend to use linguistic cues that can be easily automated while humans use cues that require dialogue understanding.<n>These conclusions are based on a large-scale analysis of social media tweets across 200mil users across 7 events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-01T14:45:43Z) - Social bots sour activist sentiment without eroding engagement [0.0]
We find that bots exert a greater influence on human behavior than vice versa during heated online periods.
Political astroturfing bots increase activity, whereas other bots decrease it.
Despite the seemingly minor impact of individual bot encounters, the cumulative effect is profound due to the large volume of bot communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T16:58:45Z) - User-Like Bots for Cognitive Automation: A Survey [4.075971633195745]
Despite the hype, bots with human user-like cognition do not currently exist.
They lack situational awareness on the digital platforms where they operate.
We discuss how cognitive architectures can contribute to creating intelligent software bots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T20:16:24Z) - My Brother Helps Me: Node Injection Based Adversarial Attack on Social Bot Detection [69.99192868521564]
Social platforms such as Twitter are under siege from a multitude of fraudulent users.
Due to the structure of social networks, the majority of methods are based on the graph neural network(GNN), which is susceptible to attacks.
We propose a node injection-based adversarial attack method designed to deceive bot detection models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T03:09:48Z) - EmpBot: A T5-based Empathetic Chatbot focusing on Sentiments [75.11753644302385]
Empathetic conversational agents should not only understand what is being discussed, but also acknowledge the implied feelings of the conversation partner.
We propose a method based on a transformer pretrained language model (T5)
We evaluate our model on the EmpatheticDialogues dataset using both automated metrics and human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-30T19:04:48Z) - CheerBots: Chatbots toward Empathy and Emotionusing Reinforcement
Learning [60.348822346249854]
This study presents a framework whereby several empathetic chatbots are based on understanding users' implied feelings and replying empathetically for multiple dialogue turns.
We call these chatbots CheerBots. CheerBots can be retrieval-based or generative-based and were finetuned by deep reinforcement learning.
To respond in an empathetic way, we develop a simulating agent, a Conceptual Human Model, as aids for CheerBots in training with considerations on changes in user's emotional states in the future to arouse sympathy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-08T07:44:47Z) - Put Chatbot into Its Interlocutor's Shoes: New Framework to Learn
Chatbot Responding with Intention [55.77218465471519]
This paper proposes an innovative framework to train chatbots to possess human-like intentions.
Our framework included a guiding robot and an interlocutor model that plays the role of humans.
We examined our framework using three experimental setups and evaluate the guiding robot with four different metrics to demonstrated flexibility and performance advantages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-30T15:24:37Z) - A ground-truth dataset and classification model for detecting bots in
GitHub issue and PR comments [70.1864008701113]
Bots are used in Github repositories to automate repetitive activities that are part of the distributed software development process.
This paper proposes a ground-truth dataset, based on a manual analysis with high interrater agreement, of pull request and issue comments in 5,000 distinct Github accounts.
We propose an automated classification model to detect bots, taking as main features the number of empty and non-empty comments of each account, the number of comment patterns, and the inequality between comments within comment patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T09:30:52Z) - Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifiers [60.63582690037839]
Malicious actors create inauthentic social media accounts controlled in part by algorithms, known as social bots, to disseminate misinformation and agitate online discussion.
We show that different types of bots are characterized by different behavioral features.
We propose a new supervised learning method that trains classifiers specialized for each class of bots and combines their decisions through the maximum rule.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T22:59:59Z) - Perception and Acceptance of an Autonomous Refactoring Bot [11.908989544044998]
We deployed an autonomous bot for 41 days in a student software development project.
We conducted semi-structured interviews to find out how developers perceive the bot and whether they are more or less critical when reviewing the contributions of a bot compared to human contributions.
Our findings show that the bot was perceived as a useful and unobtrusive contributor, and developers were no more critical of it than they were about their human colleagues, but only a few team members felt responsible for the bot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-08T14:47:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.