Understanding Help Seeking for Digital Privacy, Safety, and Security

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11398v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:10:02 GMT
• Title: Understanding Help Seeking for Digital Privacy, Safety, and Security
• Abstract summary: We sift through over one billion Reddit posts to identify where and for what users seek digital privacy, safety, or security help.<n>We isolate three million relevant posts with 93% precision and recall and automatically annotate each with the topics discussed.<n>We use this dataset to understand the scope and scale of help seeking, the communities that provide help, and the types of help sought.
• Score: 13.778698491438114
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The complexity of navigating digital privacy, safety, and security threats often falls directly on users. This leads to users seeking help from family and peers, platforms and advice guides, dedicated communities, and even large language models (LLMs). As a precursor to improving resources across this ecosystem, our community needs to understand what help seeking looks like in the wild. To that end, we blend qualitative coding with LLM fine-tuning to sift through over one billion Reddit posts from the last four years to identify where and for what users seek digital privacy, safety, or security help. We isolate three million relevant posts with 93% precision and recall and automatically annotate each with the topics discussed (e.g., security tools, privacy configurations, scams, account compromise, content moderation, and more). We use this dataset to understand the scope and scale of help seeking, the communities that provide help, and the types of help sought. Our work informs the development of better resources for users (e.g., user guides or LLM help-giving agents) while underscoring the inherent challenges of supporting users through complex combinations of threats, platforms, mitigations, context, and emotions.

Related papers

• Seeking Help in the Digital Age: A Cross-Platform Analysis of Online Support Systems for Technology-Facilitated Abuse Victims [3.4605921795640477]
  Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) has become a pervasive form of interpersonal harm.<n>We present a large-scale evaluation of online support for TFA victims across three channels: web search, peer-support forums, and conversational AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T17:35:20Z)
• Understanding Users' Security and Privacy Concerns and Attitudes Towards Conversational AI Platforms [3.789219860006095]
  We conduct a large-scale analysis of over 2.5M user posts from the r/ChatGPT Reddit community to understand users' security and privacy concerns.<n>We find that users are concerned about each stage of the data lifecycle (i.e., collection, usage, and retention)<n>We provide recommendations for users, platforms, enterprises, and policymakers to enhance transparency, improve data controls, and increase user trust and adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T03:22:48Z)
• A Systematic Review of Security Communication Strategies: Guidelines and Open Challenges [47.205801464292485]
  We identify user difficulties including information overload, technical comprehension, and balancing security awareness with comfort.<n>Our findings reveal consistent communication paradoxes: users require technical details for credibility yet struggle with jargon and need risk awareness without experiencing anxiety.<n>This work contributes to more effective security communication practices that enable users to recognize and respond to cybersecurity threats appropriately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T20:18:38Z)
• Do LLMs Consider Security? An Empirical Study on Responses to Programming Questions [10.69738882390809]
  ChatGPT can volunteer context-specific information to developers, promoting safe coding practices.<n>We evaluate the degree of security awareness exhibited by three prominent LLMs: Claude 3, GPT-4, and Llama 3.<n>Our findings show that all three models struggle to accurately detect and warn users about vulnerabilities, achieving a detection rate of only 12.6% to 40% across our datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T02:20:06Z)
• The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies [58.94148083602662]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) agents have evolved to perform complex tasks.<n>The widespread applications of LLM agents demonstrate their significant commercial value.<n>However, they also expose security and privacy vulnerabilities.<n>This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the newly emerged privacy and security issues faced by LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T00:26:24Z)
• Towards Safety and Helpfulness Balanced Responses via Controllable Large Language Models [64.5204594279587]
  A model that prioritizes safety will cause users to feel less engaged and assisted while prioritizing helpfulness will potentially cause harm. We propose to balance safety and helpfulness in diverse use cases by controlling both attributes in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:59:06Z)
• Privacy-preserving Optics for Enhancing Protection in Face De-identification [60.110274007388135]
  We propose a hardware-level face de-identification method to solve this vulnerability. We also propose an anonymization framework that generates a new face using the privacy-preserving image, face heatmap, and a reference face image from a public dataset as input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T19:28:04Z)
• Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Prompts [57.49685172971446]
  We present Rainbow Teaming, a novel black-box approach for producing a diverse collection of adversarial prompts.<n>Our approach reveals hundreds of effective adversarial prompts, with an attack success rate exceeding 90%.<n>We additionally explore the versatility of Rainbow Teaming by applying it to question answering and cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T18:47:27Z)
• Evaluating the Security and Privacy Risk Postures of Virtual Assistants [3.1943453294492543]
  We evaluated the security and privacy postures of eight widely used voice assistants: Alexa, Braina, Cortana, Google Assistant, Kalliope, Mycroft, Hound, and Extreme. Results revealed that these VAs are vulnerable to a range of security threats. These vulnerabilities could allow malicious actors to gain unauthorized access to users' personal information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T12:10:52Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• SoK: A Framework for Unifying At-Risk User Research [18.216554583064063]
  At-risk users are people who experience elevated digital security, privacy, and safety threats because of what they do. We present a framework for reasoning about at-risk users based on a wide-ranging meta-analysis of 85 papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T22:27:24Z)
• Personalized multi-faceted trust modeling to determine trust links in social media and its potential for misinformation management [61.88858330222619]
  We present an approach for predicting trust links between peers in social media. We propose a data-driven multi-faceted trust modeling which incorporates many distinct features for a comprehensive analysis. Illustrated in a trust-aware item recommendation task, we evaluate the proposed framework in the context of a large Yelp dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T19:40:51Z)
• Panel: Humans and Technology for Inclusive Privacy and Security [7.5852661910985795]
  Separate issues arise between generic guidance (i.e., protect all user data from malicious threats) and the approach of privacy. The panel will focus on potentially vulnerable populations, such as older adults, teens, persons with disabilities, and others who are not typically emphasized in general security and privacy concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T23:35:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.