Seeking Help in the Digital Age: A Cross-Platform Analysis of Online Support Systems for Technology-Facilitated Abuse Victims

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21549v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:35:20 GMT
• Title: Seeking Help in the Digital Age: A Cross-Platform Analysis of Online Support Systems for Technology-Facilitated Abuse Victims
• Abstract summary: Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) has become a pervasive form of interpersonal harm.<n>We present a large-scale evaluation of online support for TFA victims across three channels: web search, peer-support forums, and conversational AI systems.
• Score: 3.4605921795640477
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA), the use of digital technologies to stalk, harass, monitor or threaten others, has become a pervasive form of interpersonal harm. As victims turn to online sources for guidance, responses can shape how they assess risks, interpret abuse, and choose protective actions. We present a large-scale evaluation of online support for TFA victims across three channels: web search, peer-support forums, and conversational AI systems. Drawing on a decade of victim narratives from r/Stalking, we use qualitative coding and supervised classifiers to construct a dataset of TFA queries spanning 11 categories of technology misuse. We simulate these queries across the three channels and evaluate responses using a unified framework spanning technical, social, and safety dimensions. The framework assesses relevance, accuracy, actionability, persuasiveness, and understandability, alongside platform risks and support characteristics, including social-engineering risk, toxicity, empathy, bias, risky guidance, and support information. We build and validate automated classifiers to scale the evaluation. Our findings reveal differences in support quality across platforms. Google Search and general-purpose LLMs provide more relevant and actionable guidance than Reddit discussions, yet none consistently provide safe, trauma-informed support. More than 65% of victim queries encounter potentially malicious links in search results, over 20% of Reddit discussions contain toxic responses, and conversational AI systems frequently fail to provide risk-aware guidance or concrete support resources. Surprisingly, domain-specific survivor-support chatbots underperform general-purpose LLMs across most dimensions. These findings expose weaknesses in digital support for TFA victims and highlight the need for safety-centered design, evaluation, and deployment of future support technologies.

Related papers

• A Multi-Turn Framework for Evaluating AI Misuse in Fraud and Cybercrime Scenarios [1.1864532555108382]
  It is unclear the extent to which current large language models can provide useful information for complex criminal activity.<n>We evaluate whether models provide actionable assistance beyond information typically available on the web, as assessed by domain experts.<n>We found that (1) current large language models provide minimal actionable information for fraud and cybercrime without the use of advanced jailbreaking techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T12:01:38Z)
• Understanding Help Seeking for Digital Privacy, Safety, and Security [13.778698491438114]
  We sift through over one billion Reddit posts to identify where and for what users seek digital privacy, safety, or security help.<n>We isolate three million relevant posts with 93% precision and recall and automatically annotate each with the topics discussed.<n>We use this dataset to understand the scope and scale of help seeking, the communities that provide help, and the types of help sought.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T16:10:02Z)
• Assessing LLM Response Quality in the Context of Technology-Facilitated Abuse [9.590490541338022]
  Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) is a pervasive form of intimate partner violence (IPV) that leverages digital tools to control, surveil, or harm survivors.<n>We present the first expert-led manual evaluation of four large language models (LLMs)<n>We assess the quality of zero-shot single-turn LLM responses generated with a survivor safety-centered prompt on criteria tailored to the TFA domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T19:26:28Z)
• A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives [65.3369988566853]
  Recent studies have demonstrated that adversaries can replicate a target model's functionality.<n>Model Extraction Attacks pose threats to intellectual property, privacy, and system security.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy that classifies MEAs according to attack mechanisms, defense approaches, and computing environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T19:49:59Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability.<n>The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Risks and NLP Design: A Case Study on Procedural Document QA [52.557503571760215]
  We argue that clearer assessments of risks and harms to users will be possible when we specialize the analysis to more concrete applications and their plausible users. We conduct a risk-oriented error analysis that could then inform the design of a future system to be deployed with lower risk of harm and better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T17:23:43Z)
• Designing Chatbots to Support Victims and Survivors of Domestic Abuse [2.3020018305241337]
  We investigate the role that chatbots may play in supporting victims/survivors in situations such as these or where direct access to help is limited. Interviews were conducted with experts working in domestic abuse support services and organizations. Thematic content analysis was applied to assess and extract insights from the interview data and the content on victim-support websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T10:40:15Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factual Questions [89.35345649303451]
  Generative search engines have the potential to transform how people seek information online. But generated responses from existing large language models (LLMs)-backed generative search engines may not always be accurate. Retrieval-augmented generation exacerbates safety concerns, since adversaries may successfully evade the entire system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T11:22:19Z)
• Robust Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions [58.87305602959857]
  We first present a taxonomy to organize current techniques for withstanding malicious attacks and natural noise.<n>We then explore state-of-the-art methods in each category, including fraudster detection, adversarial training, certifiable robust training for defending against malicious attacks.<n>We discuss robustness across varying recommendation scenarios and its interplay with other properties like accuracy, interpretability, privacy, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T08:58:46Z)
• Towards Automated Classification of Attackers' TTPs by combining NLP with ML Techniques [77.34726150561087]
  We evaluate and compare different Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques used for security information extraction in research. Based on our investigations we propose a data processing pipeline that automatically classifies unstructured text according to attackers' tactics and techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T09:59:21Z)
• SoK: A Framework for Unifying At-Risk User Research [18.216554583064063]
  At-risk users are people who experience elevated digital security, privacy, and safety threats because of what they do. We present a framework for reasoning about at-risk users based on a wide-ranging meta-analysis of 85 papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T22:27:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.