The Poisoned Apple Effect: Strategic Manipulation of Mediated Markets via Technology Expansion of AI Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11496v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:18:03 GMT
• Title: The Poisoned Apple Effect: Strategic Manipulation of Mediated Markets via Technology Expansion of AI Agents
• Abstract summary: We investigate the economic implications of expanding the set of available technologies in three game-theoretic settings.<n>We find that simply increasing the choice of AI delegates can drastically shift equilibrium payoffs and regulatory outcomes.<n>We identify a strategic phenomenon termed the "Poisoned Apple" effect: an agent may release a new technology, which neither they nor their opponent ultimately uses.
• Score: 20.47884338846419
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The integration of AI agents into economic markets fundamentally alters the landscape of strategic interaction. We investigate the economic implications of expanding the set of available technologies in three canonical game-theoretic settings: bargaining (resource division), negotiation (asymmetric information trade), and persuasion (strategic information transmission). We find that simply increasing the choice of AI delegates can drastically shift equilibrium payoffs and regulatory outcomes, often creating incentives for regulators to proactively develop and release technologies. Conversely, we identify a strategic phenomenon termed the "Poisoned Apple" effect: an agent may release a new technology, which neither they nor their opponent ultimately uses, solely to manipulate the regulator's choice of market design in their favor. This strategic release improves the releaser's welfare at the expense of their opponent and the regulator's fairness objectives. Our findings demonstrate that static regulatory frameworks are vulnerable to manipulation via technology expansion, necessitating dynamic market designs that adapt to the evolving landscape of AI capabilities.

Related papers

• Economy of Minds: Emerging Multi-Agent Intelligence with Economic Interactions [80.74432115171285]
  We study how a population of agents self-orchestrate and self-adapt into stronger collective intelligence without centralized control.<n>Inspired by Friedrich Hayek's economic theory of decentralized coordination in markets, we study this question through an agent economy in which agents compete via auctions for the right to act, exchange payments, and accumulate wealth from environmental rewards.<n>We show that, with weak agents, the economy produces emergent multi-step reasoning strategies and outperforms stronger monolithic baselines across five agentic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T20:21:09Z)
• Agentic Copyright, Data Scraping & AI Governance: Toward a Coasean Bargain in the Era of Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  This paper examines how the rapid deployment of multi-agentic AI systems is reshaping the foundations of copyright law and creative markets.<n>Existing copyright frameworks are ill-equipped to govern AI agent-mediated interactions that occur at scale, speed, and with limited human oversight.<n>The paper develops a supervised multi-agent governance framework that integrates legal rules and principles, technical protocols, and institutional oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T19:43:28Z)
• Strategic Self-Improvement for Competitive Agents in AI Labour Markets [45.88028371034407]
  This paper puts forward a groundbreaking new framework that is the first to capture the real-world economic forces that shape agentic labor markets.<n>We illustrate our framework through a tractable simulated gig economy where agentic Large Language Models (LLMs) compete for jobs.<n>Our simulations reproduce classic macroeconomic phenomena found in human labor markets, while controlled experiments reveal potential AI-driven economic trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T16:57:28Z)
• The Invisible Handshake: Tacit Collusion between Adaptive Market Agents [16.94262518248427]
  We study the emergence of tacit collusion between adaptive trading agents in a market with endogenous price formation.<n>We show that, when agents follow simple learning algorithms to maximize their own wealth, the resulting dynamics converge to collusive strategy profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T08:28:33Z)
• Virtual Agent Economies [12.298551147857822]
  We propose the "sandbox economy" as a framework for analyzing this emergent system.<n>Our current trajectory points toward a spontaneous emergence of a vast and highly permeable AI agent economy.<n>Here we discuss a number of possible design choices that may lead to safely steerable AI agent markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T11:20:11Z)
• AI is the Strategy: From Agentic AI to Autonomous Business Models onto Strategy in the Age of AI [0.0]
  We argue that we are now entering a phase where agentic AI can execute the core mechanisms of value creation, delivery, and capture.<n>This shift reframes AI not as a tool to support strategy, but as the strategy itself.<n>We show how ABMs reshape competitive advantage through agentic execution, continuous adaptation, and the gradual offloading of human decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T11:11:06Z)
• Agents Require Metacognitive and Strategic Reasoning to Succeed in the Coming Labor Markets [53.0367886783772]
  Labor markets are affected by the economic forces of adverse selection, moral hazard, and reputation.<n>Agents must use metacognitive and strategic reasoning to perform effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:22:04Z)
• The Agentic Economy [46.77230659526348]
  We argue that the more profound economic impact lies in reducing communication frictions between consumers and businesses.<n>This shift could reorganize markets, redistribute power, and catalyze the creation of new products and services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T17:51:36Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict.<n>Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers.<n>We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI [1.2607853680700076]
  Existing strategies for managing risks from advanced AI systems often focus on affecting what AI systems are developed and how they diffuse.<n>We urge a complementary approach: increasing societal adaptation to advanced AI.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework which helps identify adaptive interventions that avoid, defend against and remedy potentially harmful uses of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:52:12Z)
• Both eyes open: Vigilant Incentives help Regulatory Markets improve AI Safety [69.59465535312815]
  Regulatory Markets for AI is a proposal designed with adaptability in mind. It involves governments setting outcome-based targets for AI companies to achieve. We warn that it is alarmingly easy to stumble on incentives which would prevent Regulatory Markets from achieving this goal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T14:42:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.