MetaScoreLens: Evaluating User Feedback Across Digital Entertainment Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11523v1
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 03:54:05 GMT
- Title: MetaScoreLens: Evaluating User Feedback Across Digital Entertainment Systems
- Authors: Christian Ellington, Paramahansa Pramanik, Haley K. Robinson,
- Abstract summary: This study compares user review ratings across four current-generation gaming systems: Nintendo, Xbox, PlayStation, and PC.<n>PC titles tend to receive the most favorable user feedback, followed by Xbox and PlayStation, while Nintendo games showed the lowest average ratings.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The popularity of electronic games has grown steadily in recent years, attracting a broad audience across age groups. With this growth comes a large volume of related data, prompting efforts like the PlayMyData to compile and share structured datasets for academic use. This study utilizes such a dataset to compare user review ratings across four current-generation gaming systems: Nintendo, Xbox, PlayStation, and PC. Statistical methods, including analysis of variance (ANOVA), were applied to identify differences in average scores among these platforms. The findings indicate that PC titles tend to receive the most favorable user feedback, followed by Xbox and PlayStation, while Nintendo games showed the lowest average ratings. These patterns suggest that the platform on which a game is released may influence how players evaluate their experience. Such results may be valuable to developers and industry stakeholders in making informed decisions about future investments and development priorities.
Related papers
- Sentiment Analysis On YouTube Comments Using Machine Learning Techniques Based On Video Games Content [0.0]
This study presents a sentiment analysis on video games based on YouTube comments.<n>The analysis spanned multiple popular gaming videos, revealing trends and insights into user preferences and critiques.<n>The findings underscore the importance of advanced sentiment analysis in capturing the nuanced emotions expressed in user comments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T05:02:25Z) - Who is a Better Player: LLM against LLM [53.46608216197315]
We propose an adversarial benchmarking framework to assess the comprehensive performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) through board games competition.<n>We introduce Qi Town, a specialized evaluation platform that supports 5 widely played games and involves 20 LLM-driven players.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T06:41:47Z) - The Leaderboard Illusion [61.27964089648608]
Arena has emerged as the go-to leaderboard for ranking the most capable AI systems.<n>We identify systematic issues that have resulted in a distorted playing field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T15:48:49Z) - Addressing bias in Recommender Systems: A Case Study on Data Debiasing Techniques in Mobile Games [3.18175475159604]
This case study aims to identify and categorize potential bias within datasets specific to model-based recommendations in mobile games.<n>It reviews debiasing techniques in the existing literature, and assess their effectiveness on real-world data gathered through implicit feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T19:45:17Z) - E-polis: A serious game for the gamification of sociological surveys [55.2480439325792]
E-polis is a serious game that gamifies a sociological survey for studying young people's opinions regarding their ideal society.
The game can be used to collect data on a variety of topics, such as social justice, and economic development, or to promote civic engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T18:25:13Z) - Competition, Alignment, and Equilibria in Digital Marketplaces [97.03797129675951]
We study a duopoly market where platform actions are bandit algorithms and the two platforms compete for user participation.
Our main finding is that competition in this market does not perfectly align market outcomes with user utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-30T17:43:58Z) - Integrating Rankings into Quantized Scores in Peer Review [61.27794774537103]
In peer review, reviewers are usually asked to provide scores for the papers.
To mitigate this issue, conferences have started to ask reviewers to additionally provide a ranking of the papers they have reviewed.
There are no standard procedure for using this ranking information and Area Chairs may use it in different ways.
We take a principled approach to integrate the ranking information into the scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-05T19:39:13Z) - Perceptual Score: What Data Modalities Does Your Model Perceive? [73.75255606437808]
We introduce the perceptual score, a metric that assesses the degree to which a model relies on the different subsets of the input features.
We find that recent, more accurate multi-modal models for visual question-answering tend to perceive the visual data less than their predecessors.
Using the perceptual score also helps to analyze model biases by decomposing the score into data subset contributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T12:19:56Z) - Predicting user demographics based on interest analysis [1.7403133838762448]
This paper proposes a framework to predict users' demographic based on ratings registered by users in a system.
Using all ratings registered by users improves the prediction accuracy by at least 16% compared with previously studied models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-02T16:25:09Z) - The Evaluation of Rating Systems in Team-based Battle Royale Games [4.168733556014873]
This paper explores the utility of several metrics for evaluating three popular rating systems on a real-world dataset of over 25,000 team battle royale matches.
normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG) demonstrated more reliable performance and more flexibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-28T19:22:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.