Making AI Philosophical Again: On Philip E. Agre's Legacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11569v1
• Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 18:31:03 GMT
• Title: Making AI Philosophical Again: On Philip E. Agre's Legacy
• Authors: Jethro Masis,
• Abstract summary: The paper analyzes Philip E. Agre's work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, philosophy, and critical theory.<n>It argues that his project encounters a fundamental impasse: the open and self-disclosing character of human existence cannot be fully captured or programmed.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper examines the intellectual legacy of Philip E. Agre by situating his work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, philosophy, and critical theory. It reconstructs Agre's proposal of a critical technical practice, according to which AI should be understood not merely as an engineering discipline but as a form of mathematized philosophy shaped by historically contingent metaphors, assumptions, and discourses. Drawing on Heideggerian phenomenology, especially the distinction between ready-to-hand and present-at-hand, Agre sought to reform AI by emphasizing interaction, embedding, indexicality, and deictic representation over traditional mentalist and representational models. The paper analyzes Agre's attempt to operationalize these ideas through computational implementations such as the Pengi system, highlighting both the philosophical ambition and the technical limitations of programming phenomenological concepts. While acknowledging Agre's success in exposing the hidden philosophical commitments of AI and enriching its conceptual vocabulary, the paper ultimately argues that his project encounters a fundamental impasse: the open and self-disclosing character of human existence articulated by Heidegger cannot be fully captured or programmed without reducing ontological phenomena to ontic mechanisms. Agre's enduring contribution therefore lies less in offering a viable Heideggerian AI than in compelling technical practice to become reflexive, historically conscious, and openly philosophical.

Related papers

• Lures of Engagement: An Outlook on Tactical AI Art [0.0]
  This paper introduces new perspectives for the poetic, expressive, and ethical features of tactical media art that involves artificial intelligence (AI)<n>It discusses the works that exemplify poetic complexity and manifest the indicative stratum of a broader milieu of contemporary art, culture, economy, and society.<n>The closing sections summarize the major issues of AI art and outline possible directions to tackle the challenges and advance the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T12:10:24Z)
• Emergent, not Immanent: A Baradian Reading of Explainable AI [37.51348424835944]
  We argue that interpretations emerge from situated entanglements of the AI model with humans, context, and the interpretative apparatus.<n>We propose design directions for XAI interfaces that support emergent interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T14:32:40Z)
• Epistemoverse: Toward an AI-Driven Knowledge Metaverse for Intellectual Heritage Preservation [0.0]
  We analyze authentic philosophical debates generated among AI-reincarnated philosophers within the interactive art installations of the Syntropic Counterpoints project.<n>We propose the concept of the Epistemoverse--a metaverse of knowledge where human and machine cognition intersect to preserve, reinterpret, and extend intellectual heritage through AI-driven interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T06:18:50Z)
• The Metaphysics We Train: A Heideggerian Reading of Machine Learning [0.130536490219656]
  We argue that this philosophical lens reveals three insights invisible to purely technical analysis.<n>Second, even sophisticated technical advances remain within the regime of Gestell (Enframing)<n>Third, AI's lack of existential structure, specifically the absence of Care (Sorge) is genuinely explanatory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T08:25:38Z)
• Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI [57.44526951497041]
  We advocate for intelligent systems that ground learning in both physical principles and embodied reasoning processes.<n>Our synthesis envisions next-generation world models capable of explaining physical phenomena and predicting future states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T16:16:03Z)
• Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Science [48.38628297686686]
  Cognitive Science has profoundly shaped disciplines such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience, Linguistics, and Culture.<n>Many breakthroughs in AI trace their roots to cognitive theories, while AI itself has become an indispensable tool for advancing cognitive research.<n>We argue that the future of AI within Cognitive Science lies not only in improving performance but also in constructing systems that deepen our understanding of the human mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T11:26:17Z)
• Mechanistic Interpretability Needs Philosophy [32.28998520468988]
  We argue that mechanistic interpretability needs philosophy: not as an afterthought, but as an ongoing partner in clarifying its concepts.<n>This position paper illustrates the value philosophy can add to MI research, and outlines a path toward deeper interdisciplinary dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T17:13:30Z)
• Architectures of Error: A Philosophical Inquiry into AI and Human Code Generation [0.0]
  This paper articulates distinct Architectures of Error'' to ground an distinction between human and machine code generation.<n> Examined through their shared vulnerability to error, this distinction reveals fundamentally different causal origins: human-cognitive versus artificial-stochastic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T22:49:36Z)
• Neurosymbolic Graph Enrichment for Grounded World Models [47.92947508449361]
  We present a novel approach to enhance and exploit LLM reactive capability to address complex problems. We create a multimodal, knowledge-augmented formal representation of meaning that combines the strengths of large language models with structured semantic representations. By bridging the gap between unstructured language models and formal semantic structures, our method opens new avenues for tackling intricate problems in natural language understanding and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T17:23:55Z)
• Toward an Artist-Centred AI [0.0]
  This paper contextualizes the notions of suitability and desirability of principles, practices, and tools related to the use of AI in the arts. It was composed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T09:43:23Z)
• A philosophical and ontological perspective on Artificial General Intelligence and the Metaverse [0.0]
  This paper explores the concept of embodied artificial general intelligence (AGI), its relationship to human consciousness, and the key role of the metaverse in facilitating this relationship.<n>Several theoretical frameworks underpin this exploration, such as embodied cognition, Michael Levin's computational boundary of a "Self," and Donald D. Hoffman's Interface Theory of Perception.<n>The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of achieving a certain degree of harmony in human relations and recognizing the interconnectedness of humanity at a global level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T21:43:11Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Formalising Concepts as Grounded Abstractions [68.24080871981869]
  This report shows how representation learning can be used to induce concepts from raw data. The main technical goal of this report is to show how techniques from representation learning can be married with a lattice-theoretic formulation of conceptual spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T15:22:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.