Epistemoverse: Toward an AI-Driven Knowledge Metaverse for Intellectual Heritage Preservation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12201v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 06:18:50 GMT
• Title: Epistemoverse: Toward an AI-Driven Knowledge Metaverse for Intellectual Heritage Preservation
• Authors: Predrag K. Nikolić, Robert Prentner,
• Abstract summary: We analyze authentic philosophical debates generated among AI-reincarnated philosophers within the interactive art installations of the Syntropic Counterpoints project.<n>We propose the concept of the Epistemoverse--a metaverse of knowledge where human and machine cognition intersect to preserve, reinterpret, and extend intellectual heritage through AI-driven interaction.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have often been characterized as "stochastic parrots" that merely reproduce fragments of their training data. This study challenges that assumption by demonstrating that, when placed in an appropriate dialogical context, LLMs can develop emergent conceptual structures and exhibit interaction-driven (re-)structuring of cognitive interfaces and reflective question-asking. Drawing on the biological principle of cloning and Socrates' maieutic method, we analyze authentic philosophical debates generated among AI-reincarnated philosophers within the interactive art installations of the Syntropic Counterpoints project. By engaging digital counterparts of Aristotle, Nietzsche, Machiavelli, and Sun Tzu in iterative discourse, the study reveals how machine dialogue can give rise to inferential coherence, reflective questioning, and creative synthesis. Based on these findings, we propose the concept of the Epistemoverse--a metaverse of knowledge where human and machine cognition intersect to preserve, reinterpret, and extend intellectual heritage through AI-driven interaction. This framework positions virtual and immersive environments as new spaces for epistemic exchange, digital heritage, and collaborative creativity.

Related papers

• Making AI Philosophical Again: On Philip E. Agre's Legacy [0.0]
  The paper analyzes Philip E. Agre's work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, philosophy, and critical theory.<n>It argues that his project encounters a fundamental impasse: the open and self-disclosing character of human existence cannot be fully captured or programmed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T18:31:03Z)
• From Perception to Cognition: A Survey of Vision-Language Interactive Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [66.36007274540113]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) strive to achieve a profound, human-like understanding of and interaction with the physical world.<n>They often exhibit a shallow and incoherent integration when acquiring information (Perception) and conducting reasoning (Cognition)<n>This survey introduces a novel and unified analytical framework: From Perception to Cognition"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:25:40Z)
• Mind Meets Space: Rethinking Agentic Spatial Intelligence from a Neuroscience-inspired Perspective [53.556348738917166]
  Recent advances in agentic AI have led to systems capable of autonomous task execution and language-based reasoning.<n>Human spatial intelligence, rooted in integrated multisensory perception, spatial memory, and cognitive maps, enables flexible, context-aware decision-making in unstructured environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T05:23:22Z)
• Noosemia: toward a Cognitive and Phenomenological Account of Intentionality Attribution in Human-Generative AI Interaction [4.022364531869169]
  This paper introduces and formalizes Noosemia, a novel cognitive-phenomenological pattern emerging from human interaction with generative AI systems.<n>We propose a multidisciplinary framework to explain how, under certain conditions, users attribute intentionality, agency, and even interiority to these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T17:10:08Z)
• The AI Ethical Resonance Hypothesis: The Possibility of Discovering Moral Meta-Patterns in AI Systems [0.0]
  The paper proposes that advanced AI systems may emerge with the ability to identify subtle moral patterns that are invisible to the human mind.<n>The paper explores the possibility that by processing and synthesizing large amounts of ethical contexts, AI systems may discover moral meta-patterns that transcend cultural, historical, and individual biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T08:28:06Z)
• AI's Euclid's Elements Moment: From Language Models to Computable Thought [2.1142253753427402]
  This paper presents a comprehensive five-stage evolutionary framework for understanding the development of artificial intelligence.<n>We posit that AI is advancing through distinct epochs, each defined by a revolutionary shift in its capacity for representation and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T04:14:19Z)
• In Dialogue with Intelligence: Rethinking Large Language Models as Collective Knowledge [1.624454100511275]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can be understood as Collective Knowledge (CK): a condensation of human cultural and technical output.<n>This article postulates differential response modes that plausibly trace their origin to distinct modelworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T18:36:00Z)
• The Way We Prompt: Conceptual Blending, Neural Dynamics, and Prompt-Induced Transitions in LLMs [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit behaviors that often evoke a sense of personality and intelligence.<n>This work proposes prompt engineering as a scientific method for probing the deep structure of meaning itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T07:37:21Z)
• Revealing emergent human-like conceptual representations from language prediction [90.73285317321312]
  Large language models (LLMs) trained solely through next-token prediction on text exhibit strikingly human-like behaviors.<n>Are these models developing concepts akin to those of humans?<n>We found that LLMs can flexibly derive concepts from linguistic descriptions in relation to contextual cues about other concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T23:54:17Z)
• A Mechanistic Explanatory Strategy for XAI [0.0]
  This paper outlines a mechanistic strategy for explaining the functional organization of deep learning systems.<n>The findings suggest that pursuing mechanistic explanations can uncover elements that traditional explainability techniques may overlook.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T18:30:32Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• A Neuro-mimetic Realization of the Common Model of Cognition via Hebbian Learning and Free Energy Minimization [55.11642177631929]
  Large neural generative models are capable of synthesizing semantically rich passages of text or producing complex images. We discuss the COGnitive Neural GENerative system, such an architecture that casts the Common Model of Cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T23:28:48Z)
• Acquiring and Modelling Abstract Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualization [49.00409552570441]
  We study the role of conceptualization in commonsense reasoning, and formulate a framework to replicate human conceptual induction. We apply the framework to ATOMIC, a large-scale human-annotated CKG, aided by the taxonomy Probase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T12:24:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.