Bit-politeia: An AI Agent Community in Blockchain

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11583v1
• Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2026 17:26:54 GMT
• Title: Bit-politeia: An AI Agent Community in Blockchain
• Authors: Xing Yang,
• Abstract summary: "Bit-politeia" is an AI agent community on blockchain designed to construct a fair, efficient, and sustainable resource allocation system.<n>By leveraging AI for objective assessment and decentralized verification, Bit-politeia minimizes human bias and mitigates resource centralization issues.
• Score: 6.579039107070663
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Current resource allocation paradigms, particularly in academic evaluation, are constrained by inherent limitations such as the Matthew Effect, reward hacking driven by Goodhart's Law, and the trade-off between efficiency and fairness. To address these challenges, this paper proposes "Bit-politeia", an AI agent community on blockchain designed to construct a fair, efficient, and sustainable resource allocation system. In this virtual community, residents interact via AI agents serving as their exclusive proxies, which are optimized for impartiality and value alignment. The community adopts a "clustered grouping + hierarchical architecture" that integrates democratic centralism to balance decision-making efficiency and trust mechanisms. Agents engage through casual chat and deliberative interactions to evaluate research outputs and distribute a virtual currency as rewards. This incentive mechanism aims to achieve incentive compatibility through consensus-driven evaluation, while blockchain technology ensures immutable records of all transactions and reputation data. By leveraging AI for objective assessment and decentralized verification, Bit-politeia minimizes human bias and mitigates resource centralization issues found in traditional peer review. The proposed framework provides a novel pathway for optimizing scientific innovation through a fair and automated resource configuration process.

Related papers

• Toward a Sustainable Federated Learning Ecosystem: A Practical Least Core Mechanism for Payoff Allocation [71.86087908416255]
  We introduce a payoff allocation framework based on the least core (LC) concept.<n>Unlike traditional methods, the LC prioritizes the cohesion of the federation by minimizing the maximum dissatisfaction.<n>Case studies in federated intrusion detection demonstrate that our mechanism correctly identifies pivotal contributors and strategic alliances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:10:50Z)
• PromptChain: A Decentralized Web3 Architecture for Managing AI Prompts as Digital Assets [0.0]
  We present PromptChain, a decentralized Web3 architecture that establishes AI prompts as first-class digital assets with verifiable ownership, version control, and monetization capabilities.<n>Our design includes: (1) a comprehensive metadata schema for cross-model compatibility, (2) a stake-weighted validation mechanism to align incentives, and (3) a token economy that rewards contributors proportionally to their impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T11:10:39Z)
• Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment [69.07915246220985]
  Contractualist alignment proposes grounding decisions in agreements that diverse stakeholders would endorse.<n>We propose Resource-Rationalism: a framework where AI systems approximate the agreements rational parties would form.<n>An RRC-aligned agent would not only operate efficiently, but also be equipped to dynamically adapt to and interpret the ever-changing human social world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T18:57:13Z)
• Proof-of-Social-Capital: A Consensus Protocol Replacing Stake for Social Capital [0.47267770920095536]
  We propose a novel protocol using social capital as a non-transferable staking mechanism to ensure fairness and decentralization.<n>The theoretical framework would enhance privacy and equity, though unresolved issues like off-chain bribery require further research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T21:28:56Z)
• zScore: A Universal Decentralised Reputation System for the Blockchain Economy [0.8246494848934447]
  We provide a robust framework titled zScore, a core primitive for reputation derived from a wallet's onchain behaviour.<n>The initial results tested on retroactive data from lending protocols establish a strong correlation between a good zScore and healthy borrowing and repayment behaviour.<n>We present a list of possible applications of our system in Section 5, thereby establishing its utility in rewarding actual value creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T07:19:04Z)
• Fairness in Agentic AI: A Unified Framework for Ethical and Equitable Multi-Agent System [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework where fairness is treated as a dynamic, emergent property of agent interactions.<n>The framework integrates fairness constraints, bias mitigation strategies, and incentive mechanisms to align autonomous agent behaviors with societal values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T04:42:00Z)
• AIArena: A Blockchain-Based Decentralized AI Training Platform [3.5828467632119305]
  We propose AIArena, a decentralized AI training platform designed to democratize AI development and alignment through on-chain incentive mechanisms.<n>We instantiate and implement AIArena on the public Base blockchain Sepolia testnet, and the evaluation results demonstrate the feasibility of AIArena in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T06:35:54Z)
• Byzantine-Robust Online and Offline Distributed Reinforcement Learning [60.970950468309056]
  We consider a distributed reinforcement learning setting where multiple agents explore the environment and communicate their experiences through a central server. $alpha$-fraction of agents are adversarial and can report arbitrary fake information. We seek to identify a near-optimal policy for the underlying Markov decision process in the presence of these adversarial agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T00:44:53Z)
• Decentralized Reinforcement Learning: Global Decision-Making via Local Economic Transactions [80.49176924360499]
  We establish a framework for directing a society of simple, specialized, self-interested agents to solve sequential decision problems. We derive a class of decentralized reinforcement learning algorithms. We demonstrate the potential advantages of a society's inherent modular structure for more efficient transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T16:41:09Z)
• F2A2: Flexible Fully-decentralized Approximate Actor-critic for Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [110.35516334788687]
  Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms are sometimes unpractical in complicated applications. We propose a flexible fully decentralized actor-critic MARL framework, which can handle large-scale general cooperative multi-agent setting. Our framework can achieve scalability and stability for large-scale environment and reduce information transmission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T14:56:29Z)
• Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [55.20040781688844]
  QMIX is a novel value-based method that can train decentralised policies in a centralised end-to-end fashion. We propose the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC) as a new benchmark for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T16:51:51Z)
• Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradients [47.45255170608965]
  We propose a new multi-agent actor-critic method called counterfactual multi-agent (COMA) policy gradients.<n>COMA uses a centralised critic to estimate the Q-function and decentralised actors to optimise the agents' policies.<n>We evaluate COMA in the testbed of StarCraft unit micromanagement, using a decentralised variant with significant partial observability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2017-05-24T18:52:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.