A Confidence-Variance Theory for Pseudo-Label Selection in Semi-Supervised Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11670v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 02:51:59 GMT
• Title: A Confidence-Variance Theory for Pseudo-Label Selection in Semi-Supervised Learning
• Authors: Jinshi Liu, Pan Liu,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a Confidence-Variance (CoVar) theory framework that provides a principled joint reliability criterion for pseudo-label selection.<n>We show that reliable pseudo-labels should have both high MC and low RCV, and that the influence of RCV increases as confidence grows.<n>We integrate CoVar as a plug-in module into representative semi-supervised semantic segmentation and image classification methods.
• Score: 15.149171763610662
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Most pseudo-label selection strategies in semi-supervised learning rely on fixed confidence thresholds, implicitly assuming that prediction confidence reliably indicates correctness. In practice, deep networks are often overconfident: high-confidence predictions can still be wrong, while informative low-confidence samples near decision boundaries are discarded. This paper introduces a Confidence-Variance (CoVar) theory framework that provides a principled joint reliability criterion for pseudo-label selection. Starting from the entropy minimization principle, we derive a reliability measure that combines maximum confidence (MC) with residual-class variance (RCV), which characterizes how probability mass is distributed over non-maximum classes. The derivation shows that reliable pseudo-labels should have both high MC and low RCV, and that the influence of RCV increases as confidence grows, thereby correcting overconfident but unstable predictions. From this perspective, we cast pseudo-label selection as a spectral relaxation problem that maximizes separability in a confidence-variance feature space, and design a threshold-free selection mechanism to distinguish high- from low-reliability predictions. We integrate CoVar as a plug-in module into representative semi-supervised semantic segmentation and image classification methods. Across PASCAL VOC 2012, Cityscapes, CIFAR-10, and Mini-ImageNet with varying label ratios and backbones, it consistently improves over strong baselines, indicating that combining confidence with residual-class variance provides a more reliable basis for pseudo-label selection than fixed confidence thresholds. (Code: https://github.com/ljs11528/CoVar_Pseudo_Label_Selection.git)

Related papers

• When Confidence Fails: Revisiting Pseudo-Label Selection in Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation [15.149171763610662]
  We present Confidence Separable Learning (CSL) as a convex optimization problem within the confidence distribution feature space.<n>CSL formulates pseudo-label selection as a convex optimization problem within the confidence distribution feature space.<n>We show that CSL performs favorably against state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T14:23:09Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning [1.2183405753834562]
  This thesis investigates how uncertainty estimation can enhance the safety and trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) systems.<n>We first show that a model's training trajectory contains rich uncertainty signals that can be exploited without altering its architecture or loss.<n>We propose a lightweight, post-hoc abstention method that works across tasks, avoids the cost of deep ensembles, and achieves state-of-the-art selective prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T02:33:53Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Network Inversion for Generating Confidently Classified Counterfeits [11.599035626374409]
  In vision classification, generating inputs that elicit confident predictions is key to understanding model behavior and reliability.<n>We extend network inversion techniques to generate Confidently Classified Counterfeits (CCCs)<n>CCCs offer a model-centric perspective on confidence, revealing that models can assign high confidence to entirely synthetic, out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T03:26:49Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Binary Classification with Confidence Difference [100.08818204756093]
  This paper delves into a novel weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference (ConfDiff) classification. We propose a risk-consistent approach to tackle this problem and show that the estimation error bound the optimal convergence rate. We also introduce a risk correction approach to mitigate overfitting problems, whose consistency and convergence rate are also proven.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T11:44:50Z)
• When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
  Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples. A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction. Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z)
• Failure Prediction by Confidence Estimation of Uncertainty-Aware Dirichlet Networks [6.700873164609009]
  It is shown that uncertainty-aware deep Dirichlet neural networks provide an improved separation between the confidence of correct and incorrect predictions in the true class probability metric. A new criterion is proposed for learning the true class probability by matching prediction confidence scores while taking imbalance and TCP constraints into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:06:45Z)
• Certifying Confidence via Randomized Smoothing [151.67113334248464]
  Randomized smoothing has been shown to provide good certified-robustness guarantees for high-dimensional classification problems. Most smoothing methods do not give us any information about the confidence with which the underlying classifier makes a prediction. We propose a method to generate certified radii for the prediction confidence of the smoothed classifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-17T04:37:26Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Knowing what you know: valid and validated confidence sets in multiclass and multilabel prediction [0.8594140167290097]
  We develop conformal prediction methods for constructing valid confidence sets in multiclass and multilabel problems. By leveraging ideas from quantile regression, we build methods that always guarantee correct coverage but additionally provide conditional coverage for both multiclass and multilabel prediction problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T17:45:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.