A Multi-Agent System for Generating Actionable Business Advice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12024v1
• Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 12:07:55 GMT
• Title: A Multi-Agent System for Generating Actionable Business Advice
• Authors: Kartikey Singh Bhandari, Tanish Jain, Archit Agrawal, Dhruv Kumar, Praveen Kumar, Pratik Narang,
• Abstract summary: Customer reviews contain rich signals about product weaknesses and unmet user needs.<n>Existing analytic methods rarely move beyond descriptive tasks.<n>We present a multi-agent, LLM-based framework for prescriptive decision support.
• Score: 6.322241356158281
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Customer reviews contain rich signals about product weaknesses and unmet user needs, yet existing analytic methods rarely move beyond descriptive tasks such as sentiment analysis or aspect extraction. While large language models (LLMs) can generate free-form suggestions, their outputs often lack accuracy and depth of reasoning. In this paper, we present a multi-agent, LLM-based framework for prescriptive decision support, which transforms large scale review corpora into actionable business advice. The framework integrates four components: clustering to select representative reviews, generation of advices, iterative evaluation, and feasibility based ranking. This design couples corpus distillation with feedback driven advice refinement to produce outputs that are specific, actionable, and practical. Experiments across three service domains and multiple model families show that our framework consistently outperform single model baselines on actionability, specificity, and non-redundancy, with medium sized models approaching the performance of large model frameworks.

Related papers

• Refer-Agent: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System with Reasoning and Reflection for Referring Video Object Segmentation [50.22481337087162]
  Referring Video Object (RVOS) aims to segment objects in videos based on textual queries.<n>Refer-Agent is a collaborative multi-agent system with alternating reasoning-reflection mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T14:48:12Z)
• Talk, Snap, Complain: Validation-Aware Multimodal Expert Framework for Fine-Grained Customer Grievances [14.30884038757821]
  Existing approaches to complaint analysis largely rely on unimodal, short-form content such as tweets or product reviews.<n>We introduce VALOR, a Validation-Aware Learner with Expert Routing, tailored for this multimodal setting.<n>We evaluate VALOR on a curated multimodal complaint dataset annotated with fine-grained aspect severity and labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T17:29:28Z)
• Structural Reward Model: Enhancing Interpretability, Efficiency, and Scalability in Reward Modeling [23.919163488129985]
  The Structural Reward Model (SRM) is a modular framework integrating side-branch and auxiliary feature generators.<n>By introducing fine-grained dimensions, RMs enable interpretable and efficient evaluations, targeted diagnostics and optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:09:25Z)
• RefactorCoderQA: Benchmarking LLMs for Multi-Domain Coding Question Solutions in Cloud and Edge Deployment [20.416910591388618]
  We introduce RefactorCoderQA, a benchmark designed to evaluate and enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) across coding tasks.<n>Our fine-tuned model, RefactorCoder-MoE, achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly outperforming leading open-source and commercial baselines with an overall accuracy of 76.84%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T17:44:22Z)
• Scalable and Interpretable Contextual Bandits: A Literature Review and Retail Offer Prototype [2.7624021966289605]
  This paper presents a review of Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit (CMAB) methods and introduces an experimental framework for scalable, interpretable offer selection.<n>The approach models context at the product category level, allowing offers to span multiple categories and enabling knowledge transfer across similar offers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:13:01Z)
• Multi-domain Multilingual Sentiment Analysis in Industry: Predicting Aspect-based Opinion Quadruples [1.5039745292757671]
  This paper explores the design of an aspect-based sentiment analysis system using large language models (LLMs) for real-world use.<n>We focus on quadruple opinion extraction -- identifying aspect categories, sentiment polarity, targets, and opinion expressions from text data across different domains and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T15:11:48Z)
• Evaluation Agent: Efficient and Promptable Evaluation Framework for Visual Generative Models [51.067146460271466]
  Evaluation of visual generative models can be time-consuming and computationally expensive.<n>We propose the Evaluation Agent framework, which employs human-like strategies for efficient, dynamic, multi-round evaluations.<n>It offers four key advantages: 1) efficiency, 2) promptable evaluation tailored to diverse user needs, 3) explainability beyond single numerical scores, and 4) scalability across various models and tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T18:52:39Z)
• UltraEval: A Lightweight Platform for Flexible and Comprehensive Evaluation for LLMs [74.1976921342982]
  This paper introduces UltraEval, a user-friendly evaluation framework characterized by its lightweight nature, comprehensiveness, modularity, and efficiency. The resulting composability allows for the free combination of different models, tasks, prompts, benchmarks, and metrics within a unified evaluation workflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T09:17:12Z)
• Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluation [51.99752147380505]
  This paper presents a benchmark self-evolving framework to dynamically evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) We utilize a multi-agent system to manipulate the context or question of original instances, reframing new evolving instances with high confidence. Our framework widens performance discrepancies both between different models and within the same model across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T03:40:06Z)
• Domain-Expanded ASTE: Rethinking Generalization in Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction [67.54420015049732]
  Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction (ASTE) is a challenging task in sentiment analysis, aiming to provide fine-grained insights into human sentiments. Existing benchmarks are limited to two domains and do not evaluate model performance on unseen domains. We introduce a domain-expanded benchmark by annotating samples from diverse domains, enabling evaluation of models in both in-domain and out-of-domain settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T18:01:49Z)
• RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust Task-oriented Dialog Systems [75.87418236410296]
  We introduce the RADDLE benchmark, a collection of corpora and tools for evaluating the performance of models across a diverse set of domains. RADDLE is designed to favor and encourage models with a strong generalization ability. We evaluate recent state-of-the-art systems based on pre-training and fine-tuning, and find that grounded pre-training on heterogeneous dialog corpora performs better than training a separate model per domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T08:58:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.