Rethinking Quantum Noise in Quantum Machine Learning: When Noise Improves Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13275v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:21:35 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Quantum Noise in Quantum Machine Learning: When Noise Improves Learning
• Authors: Linghua Zhu, Yulong Dong, Ziyu Zhang, Xiaosong Li,
• Abstract summary: Quantum noise is conventionally viewed as a fundamental obstacle in near-term quantum computing.<n>We present numerical evidence that challenges this consensus.<n>Through experiments on quantum graph neural networks for molecular property prediction, we discover that quantum noise induces heterogeneous responses.
• Score: 5.083987940956758
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum noise is conventionally viewed as a fundamental obstacle in near-term quantum computing, motivating extensive error correction and mitigation strategies. We present numerical evidence that challenges this consensus. Through experiments on quantum graph neural networks for molecular property prediction, we discover that quantum noise induces heterogeneous, initialization-dependent responses. Among randomly initialized models with identical architecture, approximately one-third show performance improvement under moderate noise, while a smaller fraction deteriorate and the remainder are marginally affected. We identify a strong negative correlation ($r = -0.62$) between baseline model performance and noise benefit, suggesting that noise acts as an implicit regularizer for under-optimized models while disrupting well-converged ones. The observed optimal noise level falls below theoretical predictions, indicating error cancellation in structured quantum circuits. These findings demonstrate that quantum noise effects depend critically on initialization quality and need not be uniformly detrimental, suggesting a shift from universal noise mitigation toward structure- and noise-aware optimization strategies.

Related papers

• Continual Quantum Architecture Search with Tensor-Train Encoding: Theory and Applications to Signal Processing [68.35481158940401]
  CL-QAS is a continual quantum architecture search framework.<n>It mitigates challenges of costly encoding amplitude and forgetting in variational quantum circuits.<n>It achieves controllable robustness expressivity, sample-efficient generalization, and smooth convergence without barren plateaus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T02:36:03Z)
• Improving Quantum Neural Networks exploration by Noise-Induced Equalization [1.2043574473965317]
  We show that an optimal quantum noise level induces an equalization'' of variational parameters.<n>We report on extensive numerical simulations providing evidence of the beneficial noise effects in the neighborhood of the best equalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T15:41:46Z)
• Exploiting biased noise in variational quantum models [0.0]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are promising tools for demonstrating quantum utility on near-term quantum hardware.<n>We study the effect of quantum noise on the classical optimisation process.<n>We find that twirling, which is commonly used in standard error-mitigation strategies to symmetrise noise, actually degrades performance in the variational setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T04:14:20Z)
• Provably Robust Training of Quantum Circuit Classifiers Against Parameter Noise [49.97673761305336]
  Noise remains a major obstacle to achieving reliable quantum algorithms.<n>We present a provably noise-resilient training theory and algorithm to enhance the robustness of parameterized quantum circuit classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T02:51:34Z)
• Bayesian Quantum Amplitude Estimation [46.03321798937855]
  We present BAE, a problem-tailored and noise-aware Bayesian algorithm for quantum amplitude estimation.<n>In a fault tolerant scenario, BAE is capable of saturating the Heisenberg limit; if device noise is present, BAE can dynamically characterize it and self-adapt.<n>We propose a benchmark for amplitude estimation algorithms and use it to test BAE against other approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T18:09:41Z)
• Quantum Benchmarking of High-Fidelity Noise-Biased Operations on a Detuned-Kerr-Cat Qubit [1.4812736095876513]
  We develop a quantum control toolbox for a scalable noise-biased qubit, detuned Kerr-cat qubit.<n>We systematically characterize the noise structure of these operations using gate set tomography and dihedral randomized benchmarking.<n>Our results reveal a critical overestimation of operational noise bias inferred from bit-flip and phase-flip times alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T05:34:18Z)
• Lindblad-like quantum tomography for non-Markovian quantum dynamical maps [46.350147604946095]
  We introduce Lindblad-like quantum tomography (L$ell$QT) as a quantum characterization technique of time-correlated noise in quantum information processors.<n>We discuss L$ell$QT for the dephasing dynamics of single qubits in detail, which allows for a neat understanding of the importance of including multiple snapshots of the quantum evolution in the likelihood function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T19:29:12Z)
• Power Characterization of Noisy Quantum Kernels [52.47151453259434]
  We show that noise may make quantum kernel methods to only have poor prediction capability, even when the generalization error is small. We provide a crucial warning to employ noisy quantum kernel methods for quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T01:02:16Z)
• Accurate and Honest Approximation of Correlated Qubit Noise [39.58317527488534]
  We propose an efficient systematic construction of approximate noise channels, where their accuracy can be enhanced by incorporating noise components with higher qubit-qubit correlation degree.<n>We find that, for realistic noise strength typical for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits, correlated noise beyond two-qubit correlation can significantly affect the code simulation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T19:00:34Z)
• RobustMQ: Benchmarking Robustness of Quantized Models [54.15661421492865]
  Quantization is an essential technique for deploying deep neural networks (DNNs) on devices with limited resources. We thoroughly evaluated the robustness of quantized models against various noises (adrial attacks, natural corruptions, and systematic noises) on ImageNet. Our research contributes to advancing the robust quantization of models and their deployment in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T14:37:12Z)
• Certified Robustness of Quantum Classifiers against Adversarial Examples through Quantum Noise [68.1992787416233]
  We show that adding quantum random rotation noise can improve robustness in quantum classifiers against adversarial attacks. We derive a certified robustness bound to enable quantum classifiers to defend against adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T05:17:04Z)
• Noise effects on purity and quantum entanglement in terms of physical implementability [27.426057220671336]
  Quantum decoherence due to imperfect manipulation of quantum devices is a key issue in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. Standard analyses in quantum information and quantum computation use error rates to parameterize quantum noise channels. We propose to characterize the decoherence effect of a noise channel by the physical implementability of its inverse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T13:35:17Z)
• Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics: A performance study on the spin-boson model [68.8204255655161]
  Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics simulations are traditionally based on implementing a Trotter-approximation of the time-evolution operator. variational quantum algorithms have become an indispensable alternative, enabling small-scale simulations on present-day hardware. We show that, despite providing a clear reduction of quantum gate cost, the variational method in its current implementation is unlikely to lead to a quantum advantage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-09T18:00:05Z)
• Optimal Provable Robustness of Quantum Classification via Quantum Hypothesis Testing [14.684867444153625]
  Quantum machine learning models have the potential to offer speedups and better predictive accuracy compared to their classical counterparts. These quantum algorithms, like their classical counterparts, have been shown to be vulnerable to input perturbations. These can arise either from noisy implementations or, as a worst-case type of noise, adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T17:55:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.