Bridging the Gap Between Estimated and True Regret Towards Reliable Regret Estimation in Deep Learning based Mechanism Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13489v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:54:28 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Gap Between Estimated and True Regret Towards Reliable Regret Estimation in Deep Learning based Mechanism Design
• Authors: Shuyuan You, Zhiqiang Zhuang, Kewen Wang, Zhe Wang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a guided refinement procedure that substantially improves regret estimation accuracy while reducing computational cost.<n>Our method provides a more reliable foundation for evaluating incentive compatibility in deep learning based auction mechanisms.
• Score: 4.888008003483983
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances, such as RegretNet, ALGnet, RegretFormer and CITransNet, use deep learning to approximate optimal multi item auctions by relaxing incentive compatibility (IC) and measuring its violation via ex post regret. However, the true accuracy of these regret estimates remains unclear. Computing exact regret is computationally intractable, and current models rely on gradient based optimizers whose outcomes depend heavily on hyperparameter choices. Through extensive experiments, we reveal that existing methods systematically underestimate actual regret (In some models, the true regret is several hundred times larger than the reported regret), leading to overstated claims of IC and revenue. To address this issue, we derive a lower bound on regret and introduce an efficient item wise regret approximation. Building on this, we propose a guided refinement procedure that substantially improves regret estimation accuracy while reducing computational cost. Our method provides a more reliable foundation for evaluating incentive compatibility in deep learning based auction mechanisms and highlights the need to reassess prior performance claims in this area.

Related papers

• Addressing Overthinking in Large Vision-Language Models via Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization [56.59356959631999]
  Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization (GPRO) is a meta-reasoning controller that dynamically routes computation among three decision paths.<n>GPRO substantially improves both accuracy and efficiency, outperforming recent slow-thinking methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T23:05:17Z)
• Arbitrage: Efficient Reasoning via Advantage-Aware Speculation [71.45710345765528]
  Speculative Decoding accelerates inference by employing a fast but inaccurate draft model to autoregressively propose tokens.<n>But due to unnecessary rejections caused by token mismatches in semantically equivalent steps, traditional token-level Speculative Decoding struggles in reasoning tasks.<n>We propose Arbitrage, a novel step-level speculative generation framework that routes generation dynamically based on the relative advantage between draft and target models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T17:50:53Z)
• Don't Think Longer, Think Wisely: Optimizing Thinking Dynamics for Large Reasoning Models [68.96619605651155]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) may drastically increase the output length due to overthinking.<n>We propose a dynamic optimization framework that segments model-generated reasoning paths into distinct thinking patterns.<n>Our method achieves up to a 12% accuracy improvement and reducing token usage from approximately 5,000 to 3,000 tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T20:59:29Z)
• Decision from Suboptimal Classifiers: Excess Risk Pre- and Post-Calibration [52.70324949884702]
  We quantify the excess risk incurred using approximate posterior probabilities in batch binary decision-making.<n>We identify regimes where recalibration alone addresses most of the regret, and regimes where the regret is dominated by the grouping loss.<n>On NLP experiments, we show that these quantities identify when the expected gain of more advanced post-training is worth the operational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T10:52:36Z)
• Optimistic Regret Bounds for Online Learning in Adversarial Markov Decision Processes [5.116582735311639]
  We introduce and study a new variant of AMDP, which aims to minimize regret while utilizing a set of cost predictors. We develop a new policy search method that achieves a sublinear optimistic regret with high probability, that is a regret bound which gracefully degrades with the estimation power of the cost predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T15:44:31Z)
• Adaptive operator learning for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems [7.716833952167609]
  We develop an adaptive operator learning framework that can reduce modeling error gradually by forcing the surrogate to be accurate in local areas. We present a rigorous convergence guarantee in the linear case using the UKI framework. The numerical results show that our method can significantly reduce computational costs while maintaining inversion accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T01:50:33Z)
• Robust Losses for Decision-Focused Learning [2.9652474178611405]
  Decision-focused learning aims at training the predictive model to minimize regret by making a suboptimal decision. empirical regret can be an ineffective surrogate because empirical optimal decisions can vary substantially from expected optimal decisions. We propose three novel loss functions that approximate expected regret more robustly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T15:45:10Z)
• Deep Equilibrium Optical Flow Estimation [80.80992684796566]
  Recent state-of-the-art (SOTA) optical flow models use finite-step recurrent update operations to emulate traditional algorithms. These RNNs impose large computation and memory overheads, and are not directly trained to model such stable estimation. We propose deep equilibrium (DEQ) flow estimators, an approach that directly solves for the flow as the infinite-level fixed point of an implicit layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T17:53:44Z)
• Optimal-er Auctions through Attention [3.1423836318272773]
  We propose two independent modifications of RegretNet, namely a new neural architecture based on the attention mechanism, denoted as TransRegret, and an alternative loss function that is interpretable. In all experiments, we find that TransRegret consistently outperforms existing architectures in revenue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-26T10:47:12Z)
• Can Q-Learning be Improved with Advice? [27.24260290748049]
  This paper addresses the question of whether worst-case lower bounds for regret can be circumvented in online learning of Markov decision processes (MDPs) We show that when predictions about the optimal $Q$-value function satisfy a reasonably weak condition we call distillation, then we can improve regret bounds by replacing the set of state-action pairs with the set of state-action pairs on which the predictions are grossly inaccurate. Our work extends a recent line of work on algorithms with predictions, which has typically focused on simple online problems such as caching and scheduling, to the more complex and general problem of reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T15:44:20Z)
• Extrapolation for Large-batch Training in Deep Learning [72.61259487233214]
  We show that a host of variations can be covered in a unified framework that we propose. We prove the convergence of this novel scheme and rigorously evaluate its empirical performance on ResNet, LSTM, and Transformer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T08:22:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.