ORCA -- An Automated Threat Analysis Pipeline for O-RAN Continuous Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13681v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 07:31:59 GMT
• Title: ORCA -- An Automated Threat Analysis Pipeline for O-RAN Continuous Development
• Authors: Felix Klement, Alessandro Brighente, Michele Polese, Mauro Conti, Stefan Katzenbeisser,
• Abstract summary: Open-Radio Access Network (O-RAN) integrates numerous software components in a cloud-like deployment, opening the radio access network to previously unconsidered security threats.<n>Current vulnerability assessment practices often rely on manual, labor-intensive, and subjective investigations, leading to inconsistencies in the threat analysis.<n>We propose an automated pipeline that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) to minimize human intervention and associated biases.
• Score: 57.61878484176942
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The Open-Radio Access Network (O-RAN) integrates numerous software components in a cloud-like deployment, opening the radio access network to previously unconsidered security threats. With the ever-evolving threat landscape, integrating security practices through a DevSecOps approach is essential for fast and secure releases. Current vulnerability assessment practices often rely on manual, labor-intensive, and subjective investigations, leading to inconsistencies in the threat analysis. To mitigate these issues, we establish an automated pipeline that leverages Natural Language Processing (NLP) to minimize human intervention and associated biases. By mapping real-world vulnerabilities to predefined threat lists with a standardized input format, our approach is the first to enable iterative, quantitative, and efficient assessments, generating reliable threat scores for both individual vulnerabilities and entire system components within O-RAN. We illustrate the effectiveness of our framework through an example implementation for O-RAN, showcasing how continuous security testing can integrate into automated testing pipelines to address the unique security challenges of this paradigm shift in telecommunications.

Related papers

• SecureCAI: Injection-Resilient LLM Assistants for Cybersecurity Operations [0.0]
  This paper introduces SecureCAI, a novel defense framework extending Constitutional AI principles with security-aware guardrails.<n>SecureCAI reduces attack success rates by 94.7% compared to baseline models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T18:59:45Z)
• Systematization of Knowledge: Security and Safety in the Model Context Protocol Ecosystem [0.0]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as the de facto standard for connecting Large Language Models to external data and tools.<n>This paper provides a taxonomy of risks in the MCP ecosystem, distinguishing between adversarial security threats and safety hazards.<n>We demonstrate how "context" can be weaponized to trigger unauthorized operations in multi-agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T06:39:21Z)
• Advancing Autonomous Incident Response: Leveraging LLMs and Cyber Threat Intelligence [3.2284427438223013]
  Security teams are overwhelmed by alert fatigue, high false-positive rates, and the vast volume of unstructured Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) documents.<n>We introduce a novel Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate and enhance IR.<n>Our approach introduces a hybrid retrieval mechanism that combines NLP-based similarity searches within a CTI vector database with standardized queries to external CTI platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T14:20:34Z)
• ThreatLens: LLM-guided Threat Modeling and Test Plan Generation for Hardware Security Verification [1.0816123715383426]
  ThreatLens is a multi-agent framework that automates security threat modeling and test plan generation for hardware security verification.<n>The framework reduces the manual verification effort, enhances coverage, and ensures a structured, adaptable approach to security verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-11T03:10:39Z)
• Autonomous Identity-Based Threat Segmentation in Zero Trust Architectures [4.169915659794567]
  Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) fundamentally redefine network security by adopting a "trust nothing, verify everything" approach.<n>This research applies the proposed AI-driven, autonomous, identity-based threat segmentation in ZTA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T15:35:02Z)
• Position: Mind the Gap-the Growing Disconnect Between Established Vulnerability Disclosure and AI Security [56.219994752894294]
  We argue that adapting existing processes for AI security reporting is doomed to fail due to fundamental shortcomings for the distinctive characteristics of AI systems.<n>Based on our proposal to address these shortcomings, we discuss an approach to AI security reporting and how the new AI paradigm, AI agents, will further reinforce the need for specialized AI security incident reporting advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:50:26Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output: Benchmarking Cross-modality Safety Alignment of Large Vision-Language Model [73.8765529028288]
  We introduce a novel safety alignment challenge called Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output (SIUO) to evaluate cross-modality safety alignment.<n>To empirically investigate this problem, we developed the SIUO, a cross-modality benchmark encompassing 9 critical safety domains, such as self-harm, illegal activities, and privacy violations.<n>Our findings reveal substantial safety vulnerabilities in both closed- and open-source LVLMs, underscoring the inadequacy of current models to reliably interpret and respond to complex, real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T16:14:15Z)
• Securing the Open RAN Infrastructure: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Deployments [60.51751612363882]
  We investigate the security implications of and software-based Open Radio Access Network (RAN) systems. We highlight the presence of potential vulnerabilities and misconfigurations in the infrastructure supporting the Near Real-Time RAN Controller (RIC) cluster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T07:18:45Z)
• A Survey and Comparative Analysis of Security Properties of CAN Authentication Protocols [92.81385447582882]
  The Controller Area Network (CAN) bus leaves in-vehicle communications inherently non-secure. This paper reviews and compares the 15 most prominent authentication protocols for the CAN bus. We evaluate protocols based on essential operational criteria that contribute to ease of implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T14:52:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.