Autonomous Identity-Based Threat Segmentation in Zero Trust Architectures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06281v1
• Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 15:35:02 GMT
• Title: Autonomous Identity-Based Threat Segmentation in Zero Trust Architectures
• Authors: Sina Ahmadi,
• Abstract summary: Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) fundamentally redefine network security by adopting a "trust nothing, verify everything" approach. This research applies the proposed AI-driven, autonomous, identity-based threat segmentation in ZTA.
• Score: 4.169915659794567
• License:
• Abstract: Zero Trust Architectures (ZTA) fundamentally redefine network security by adopting a "trust nothing, verify everything" approach that requires identity verification for all access. Conventional discrete access control measures have proven inadequate since they do not consider evolving user activities and contextual threats, leading to internal threats and enhanced attacks. This research applies the proposed AI-driven, autonomous, identity-based threat segmentation in ZTA, along with real-time identity analytics for fine-grained, real-time mechanisms. Some of the sharp practices include using the behavioral analytics approach to provide real-time risk scores, such as analyzing the patterns used for logging into the system, the access sought, and the resources used. Permissions are adjusted using machine learning models that take into account context-aware factors like geolocation, device type, and access time. Automated threat segmentation helps analysts identify multiple compromised identities in real-time, thus minimizing the likelihood of a breach advancing. The system's use cases are based on real scenarios; for example, insider threats in global offices demonstrate how compromised accounts are detected and locked. This work outlines measures to address privacy issues, false positives, and scalability concerns. This research enhances the security of other critical areas of computer systems by providing dynamic access governance, minimizing insider threats, and supporting dynamic policy enforcement while ensuring that the needed balance between security and user productivity remains a top priority. We prove via comparative analyses that the model is precise and scalable.

Related papers

• VulRG: Multi-Level Explainable Vulnerability Patch Ranking for Complex Systems Using Graphs [20.407534993667607]
  This work introduces a graph-based framework for vulnerability patch prioritization. It integrates diverse data sources and metrics into a universally applicable model. refined risk metrics enable detailed assessments at the component, asset, and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T14:21:52Z)
• Distributed Identity for Zero Trust and Segmented Access Control: A Novel Approach to Securing Network Infrastructure [4.169915659794567]
  This study assesses security improvements achieved when distributed identity is employed with ZTA principle. The study suggests adopting distributed identities can enhance overall security postures by an order of magnitude. The research recommends refining technical standards, expanding the use of distributed identity in practice, and its applications for the contemporary digital security landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T00:02:02Z)
• Enhancing Enterprise Security with Zero Trust Architecture [0.0]
  Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) represents a transformative approach to modern cybersecurity. ZTA shifts the security paradigm by assuming that no user, device, or system can be trusted by default. This paper explores the key components of ZTA, such as identity and access management (IAM), micro-segmentation, continuous monitoring, and behavioral analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T21:53:16Z)
• AsIf: Asset Interface Analysis of Industrial Automation Devices [1.3216177247621483]
  Industrial control systems are increasingly adopting IT solutions, including communication standards and protocols. As these systems become more decentralized and interconnected, a critical need for enhanced security measures arises. Threat modeling is traditionally performed in structured brainstorming sessions involving domain and security experts. We propose a method for the analysis of assets in industrial systems, with special focus on physical threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T07:19:15Z)
• Rethinking the Vulnerabilities of Face Recognition Systems:From a Practical Perspective [53.24281798458074]
  Face Recognition Systems (FRS) have increasingly integrated into critical applications, including surveillance and user authentication. Recent studies have revealed vulnerabilities in FRS to adversarial (e.g., adversarial patch attacks) and backdoor attacks (e.g., training data poisoning)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T13:34:23Z)
• Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal [0.0]
  We propose a risk assessment process using tools like the risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems. We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors. We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T05:17:22Z)
• A Survey and Comparative Analysis of Security Properties of CAN Authentication Protocols [92.81385447582882]
  The Controller Area Network (CAN) bus leaves in-vehicle communications inherently non-secure. This paper reviews and compares the 15 most prominent authentication protocols for the CAN bus. We evaluate protocols based on essential operational criteria that contribute to ease of implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T14:52:04Z)
• It Is Time To Steer: A Scalable Framework for Analysis-driven Attack Graph Generation [50.06412862964449]
  Attack Graph (AG) represents the best-suited solution to support cyber risk assessment for multi-step attacks on computer networks. Current solutions propose to address the generation problem from the algorithmic perspective and postulate the analysis only after the generation is complete. This paper rethinks the classic AG analysis through a novel workflow in which the analyst can query the system anytime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T10:44:58Z)
• ASSERT: Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming for Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models [65.79770974145983]
  ASSERT, Automated Safety Scenario Red Teaming, consists of three methods -- semantically aligned augmentation, target bootstrapping, and adversarial knowledge injection. We partition our prompts into four safety domains for a fine-grained analysis of how the domain affects model performance. We find statistically significant performance differences of up to 11% in absolute classification accuracy among semantically related scenarios and error rates of up to 19% absolute error in zero-shot adversarial settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T17:10:28Z)
• When Authentication Is Not Enough: On the Security of Behavioral-Based Driver Authentication Systems [53.2306792009435]
  We develop two lightweight driver authentication systems based on Random Forest and Recurrent Neural Network architectures. We are the first to propose attacks against these systems by developing two novel evasion attacks, SMARTCAN and GANCAN. Through our contributions, we aid practitioners in safely adopting these systems, help reduce car thefts, and enhance driver security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T14:33:26Z)
• Measurement-driven Security Analysis of Imperceptible Impersonation Attacks [54.727945432381716]
  We study the exploitability of Deep Neural Network-based Face Recognition systems. We show that factors such as skin color, gender, and age, impact the ability to carry out an attack on a specific target victim. We also study the feasibility of constructing universal attacks that are robust to different poses or views of the attacker's face.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-26T19:27:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.