Just aware enough: Evaluating awareness across artificial systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14901v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:39:35 GMT
• Title: Just aware enough: Evaluating awareness across artificial systems
• Abstract summary: We argue that awareness offers a more productive and methodologically tractable alternative to AI consciousness.<n>We introduce a practical method for evaluating awareness across diverse systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent debates on artificial intelligence increasingly emphasise questions of AI consciousness and moral status, yet there remains little agreement on how such properties should be evaluated. In this paper, we argue that awareness offers a more productive and methodologically tractable alternative. We introduce a practical method for evaluating awareness across diverse systems, where awareness is understood as encompassing a system's abilities to process, store and use information in the service of goal-directed action. Central to this approach is the claim that any evaluation aiming to capture the diversity of artificial systems must be domain-sensitive, deployable at any scale, multidimensional, and enable the prediction of task performance, while generalising to the level of abilities for the sake of comparison. Given these four desiderata, we outline a structured approach to evaluating and comparing awareness profiles across artificial systems with differing architectures, scales, and operational domains. By shifting the focus from artificial consciousness to being just aware enough, this approach aims to facilitate principled assessment, support design and oversight, and enable more constructive scientific and public discourse.

Related papers

• AI-Assisted Systematization for Evaluating GenAI Systems [45.6388922756291]
  We develop two AI-assisted systematizers to produce concept specs for two concepts.<n>We evaluate resulting concept specs on content validity and information recoverability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T16:19:44Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Fundamentals of Building Autonomous LLM Agents [64.39018305018904]
  This paper reviews the architecture and implementation methods of agents powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>The research aims to explore patterns to develop "agentic" LLMs that can automate complex tasks and bridge the performance gap with human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T10:32:39Z)
• A Conceptual Framework for AI Capability Evaluations [0.0]
  We propose a conceptual framework for analyzing AI capability evaluations.<n>It offers a structured, descriptive approach that systematizes the analysis of widely used methods and terminology.<n>It also enables researchers to identify methodological weaknesses, assists practitioners in designing evaluations, and provides policymakers with a tool to scrutinize, compare, and navigate complex evaluation landscapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T00:19:27Z)
• Bridging Cognition and Emotion: Empathy-Driven Multimodal Misinformation Detection [56.644686934050576]
  Social media has become a major conduit for information dissemination, yet it also facilitates the rapid spread of misinformation.<n>Traditional misinformation detection methods primarily focus on surface-level features, overlooking the crucial roles of human empathy in the propagation process.<n>We propose the Dual-Aspect Empathy Framework (DAE), which integrates cognitive and emotional empathy to analyze misinformation from both the creator and reader perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T07:48:26Z)
• Adaptive User-centered Neuro-symbolic Learning for Multimodal Interaction with Autonomous Systems [0.0]
  Recent advances in machine learning have enabled autonomous systems to perceive and comprehend objects. It is essential to consider both the explicit teaching provided by humans and the implicit teaching obtained by observing human behavior. We argue for considering both types of inputs, as well as human-in-the-loop and incremental learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T19:35:12Z)
• Better Understanding Differences in Attribution Methods via Systematic Evaluations [57.35035463793008]
  Post-hoc attribution methods have been proposed to identify image regions most influential to the models' decisions. We propose three novel evaluation schemes to more reliably measure the faithfulness of those methods. We use these evaluation schemes to study strengths and shortcomings of some widely used attribution methods over a wide range of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T14:24:58Z)
• Helpful, Misleading or Confusing: How Humans Perceive Fundamental Building Blocks of Artificial Intelligence Explanations [11.667611038005552]
  We take a step back from sophisticated predictive algorithms and look into explainability of simple decision-making models. We aim to assess how people perceive comprehensibility of their different representations. This allows us to capture how diverse stakeholders judge intelligibility of fundamental concepts that more elaborate artificial intelligence explanations are built from.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T03:15:35Z)
• Investigating the Combination of Planning-Based and Data-Driven Methods for Goal Recognition [7.620967781722714]
  We investigate the application of two state-of-the-art, planning-based plan recognition approaches in a real-world setting. We show that such approaches have difficulties when used to recognize the goals of human subjects, because human behaviour is typically not perfectly rational. We propose an extension to the existing approaches through a classification-based method trained on observed behaviour data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-13T15:24:02Z)
• Evaluating Understanding on Conceptual Abstraction Benchmarks [0.0]
  A long-held objective in AI is to build systems that understand concepts in a humanlike way. We argue that understanding a concept requires the ability to use it in varied contexts. Our concept-based approach to evaluation reveals information about AI systems that conventional test sets would have left hidden.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T17:52:46Z)
• Towards Better Understanding Attribution Methods [77.1487219861185]
  Post-hoc attribution methods have been proposed to identify image regions most influential to the models' decisions. We propose three novel evaluation schemes to more reliably measure the faithfulness of those methods. We also propose a post-processing smoothing step that significantly improves the performance of some attribution methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T20:50:17Z)
• Cognitive architecture aided by working-memory for self-supervised multi-modal humans recognition [54.749127627191655]
  The ability to recognize human partners is an important social skill to build personalized and long-term human-robot interactions. Deep learning networks have achieved state-of-the-art results and demonstrated to be suitable tools to address such a task. One solution is to make robots learn from their first-hand sensory data with self-supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T13:50:24Z)
• Neuro-symbolic Architectures for Context Understanding [59.899606495602406]
  We propose the use of hybrid AI methodology as a framework for combining the strengths of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches. Specifically, we inherit the concept of neuro-symbolism as a way of using knowledge-bases to guide the learning progress of deep neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:04:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.