Risk Estimation for Automated Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15018v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:14:50 GMT
• Title: Risk Estimation for Automated Driving
• Abstract summary: In automated driving, risk is characterized by two aspects.<n>The uncertainty aspect typically causes the risk to be non-zero for near-collision events.<n>Existing approaches to calculate the risk either resort to empirical modeling or severe approximations.<n>In this paper, we combine recent advances in collision probability estimation with the concept of collision severity to develop a general method for accurate risk estimation.
• Score: 0.9376581451563295
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Safety is a central requirement for automated vehicles. As such, the assessment of risk in automated driving is key in supporting both motion planning technologies and safety evaluation. In automated driving, risk is characterized by two aspects. The first aspect is the uncertainty on the state estimates of other road participants by an automated vehicle. The second aspect is the severity of a collision event with said traffic participants. Here, the uncertainty aspect typically causes the risk to be non-zero for near-collision events. This makes risk particularly useful for automated vehicle motion planning. Namely, constraining or minimizing risk naturally navigates the automated vehicle around traffic participants while keeping a safety distance based on the level of uncertainty and the potential severity of the impending collision. Existing approaches to calculate the risk either resort to empirical modeling or severe approximations, and, hence, lack generalizability and accuracy. In this paper, we combine recent advances in collision probability estimation with the concept of collision severity to develop a general method for accurate risk estimation. The proposed method allows us to assign individual severity functions for different collision constellations, such as, e.g., frontal or side collisions. Furthermore, we show that the proposed approach is computationally efficient, which is beneficial, e.g., in real-time motion planning applications. The programming code for an exemplary implementation of Gaussian uncertainties is also provided.

Related papers

• Action-Conditioned Risk Gating for Safety-Critical Control under Partial Observability [79.08785366532287]
  We propose a lightweight risk-gated reinforcement learning approximation for risk-sensitive control under partial observability.<n>We evaluate the approach in two safety-critical partially observable domains: automated glucose regulation and safety-constrained navigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T01:23:09Z)
• STRAP: Spatial-Temporal Risk-Attentive Vehicle Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving [0.968535561940627]
  We propose a novel spatial-temporal risk-attentive trajectory prediction framework that incorporates a risk potential field.<n>The proposed framework provides interpretable, risk-aware predictions, contributing to more robust decision-making for autonomous driving systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T13:05:35Z)
• Learning collision risk proactively from naturalistic driving data at scale [3.1457219084519004]
  This study introduces the Generalised Surrogate Safety Measure (GSSM)<n>GSSM learns collision risk from naturalistic driving without the need for crash or risk labels.<n> Diverse data from naturalistic driving, including motion kinematics, weather, lighting, etc., are used to train multiple GSSMs.<n>A basic GSSM using only instantaneous motion kinematics achieves an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.9 and secures a median time advance of 2.6 seconds to prevent potential collisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T07:22:32Z)
• RACER: Epistemic Risk-Sensitive RL Enables Fast Driving with Fewer Crashes [57.319845580050924]
  We propose a reinforcement learning framework that combines risk-sensitive control with an adaptive action space curriculum. We show that our algorithm is capable of learning high-speed policies for a real-world off-road driving task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T23:32:36Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Mathematical Models of Human Drivers Using Artificial Risk Fields [8.074019565026544]
  We use the concept of artificial risk fields to predict how human operators control a vehicle in response to upcoming road situations. We observe that the risk fields are excellent at predicting future trajectory with high prediction accuracy for up to twenty seconds prediction horizons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T15:39:01Z)
• Safety-aware Motion Prediction with Unseen Vehicles for Autonomous Driving [104.32241082170044]
  We study a new task, safety-aware motion prediction with unseen vehicles for autonomous driving. Unlike the existing trajectory prediction task for seen vehicles, we aim at predicting an occupancy map. Our approach is the first one that can predict the existence of unseen vehicles in most cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-03T13:33:33Z)
• Analyzing vehicle pedestrian interactions combining data cube structure and predictive collision risk estimation model [5.73658856166614]
  This study introduces a new concept of a pedestrian safety system that combines the field and the centralized processes. The system can warn of upcoming risks immediately in the field and improve the safety of risk frequent areas by assessing the safety levels of roads without actual collisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T23:00:56Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)
• Addressing Inherent Uncertainty: Risk-Sensitive Behavior Generation for Automated Driving using Distributional Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We propose a two-step approach for risk-sensitive behavior generation for self-driving vehicles. First, we learn an optimal policy in an uncertain environment with Deep Distributional Reinforcement Learning. During execution, the optimal risk-sensitive action is selected by applying established risk criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T11:45:12Z)
• Deep Structured Reactive Planning [94.92994828905984]
  We propose a novel data-driven, reactive planning objective for self-driving vehicles. We show that our model outperforms a non-reactive variant in successfully completing highly complex maneuvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T01:43:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.