Beyond the Einstein-Bohr Debate: Cognitive Complementarity and the Emergence of Quantum Intuition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15314v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 10:13:29 GMT
• Title: Beyond the Einstein-Bohr Debate: Cognitive Complementarity and the Emergence of Quantum Intuition
• Authors: Lalit Kumar Shukla,
• Abstract summary: Recent high-precision experimental confirmations of quantum complementarity have revitalized foundational debates about measurement, description, and realism.<n>This article argues that complementarity is most productively interpreted as an epistemic principle--constraining what can be simultaneously accessed and represented.<n>We introduce cognitive complementarity as a structural principle governing reasoning under non-classical uncertainty.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent high-precision experimental confirmations of quantum complementarity have revitalized foundational debates about measurement, description, and realism. This article argues that complementarity is most productively interpreted as an epistemic principle--constraining what can be simultaneously accessed and represented--rather than as an ontological claim about quantum reality. Reexamining the Einstein-Bohr debate through this lens reveals a persistent tension between descriptive completeness and contextual meaning, a tension experiments clarify but do not dissolve. Building on this analysis, we introduce cognitive complementarity as a structural principle governing reasoning under non-classical uncertainty, where mutually constraining representations cannot be jointly optimized. Within this framework, we propose quantum intuition as a testable cognitive capacity: the ability to sustain representational plurality, regulate commitment timing, and resolve perspective-incompatibilities in a context-sensitive manner. Formulated as a naturalistic construct grounded in shared informational constraints, quantum intuition offers a principled bridge between quantum measurement theory and cognition. This work reframes the historical debate, extends epistemic lessons from quantum foundations into cognitive science, and outlines empirical pathways for studying decision-making in contexts of irreducible uncertainty.

Related papers

• How Alice, long before her time, derived the principles of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  This dialogue explores the idea that the foundational principles of quantum mechanics need not be interpreted as describing a new physics.<n>By pushing this perspective to its extreme, the dialogue argues that the core structures of quantum mechanics can be derived independently of any specifically quantum properties of atomic particles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-03T13:11:40Z)
• Contemporary Perspectivism as a Framework of Scientific Inquiry in Quantum Mechanics and Beyond [0.0]
  We develop the conceptual, methodological and semantic framework of contemporary perspectivism according to the norms of the proposed endo-theoretic approach.<n>We provide a comparative assessment between our perspectivist framework of quantum theory and Rovelli's relational interpretation of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T11:17:13Z)
• Towards a Generalized Theory of Observers [41.94295877935867]
  We argue that observers serve as indispensable reference points for measurement, reference frames, and the emergence of meaning.<n>We show how this formalism sheds new light on debates related to consciousness, quantum measurement, and computational boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T19:35:55Z)
• Theory-Independent Context Incompatibility: Quantification and Experimental Demonstration [0.0]
  Concept of compatibility originally emerged as a synonym for the commutativity of observables and later evolved into the notion of measurement compatibility.<n>Recently, still within the quantum domain, the concept of context incompatibility has been proposed as a resource for detecting eavesdropping in quantum communication channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T19:34:00Z)
• A decision-theoretic approach to dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics [39.146761527401424]
  We provide a decision-theoretic framework for dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics.<n>We show that measurements play the role of acts with an uncertain outcome.<n>We discuss the mathematical implications of our findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T14:53:06Z)
• All You Need for Counterfactual Explainability Is Principled and Reliable Estimate of Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty [27.344785490275864]
  We argue that transparency research overlooks many foundational concepts of artificial intelligence.<n>Inherently transparent models can benefit from human-centred explanatory insights.<n>At a higher level, integrating artificial intelligence fundamentals into transparency research promises to yield more reliable, robust and understandable predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T09:38:31Z)
• Experimental Test of Nonlocality Limits from Relativistic Independence [0.0]
  We show the existence of a fundamental limit on the extent of quantum correlations.<n>Our results shed light on the profound role of uncertainty in both enabling and balancing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T23:29:00Z)
• From Quantum Cognition to Conceptuality Interpretation II: Unraveling the Quantum Mysteries [0.0]
  An overview of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented, along with an explanation of how it sheds light on key quantum and relativistic phenomena.<n>We show how the interpretation clarifies Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, wave function-based and entanglement-based nonlocality, interference effects resulting from the superposition principle, delayed choice experiments, quantum measurements, the mechanism of quantization.<n>We argue that the interpretation can also elucidate relativistic effects, focusing on time dilation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T06:05:25Z)
• Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Measurement with A New Space-Time Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics [9.116661570248171]
  Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement. We employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:25:08Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum Causal Inference in the Presence of Hidden Common Causes: an Entropic Approach [34.77250498401055]
  We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles. We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links. This approach can lay the foundations of identifying originators of malicious activity on future multi-node quantum networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-24T22:45:50Z)
• Quantum Cognitively Motivated Decision Fusion for Video Sentiment Analysis [22.701975963984378]
  We show that the sentiment judgment from one modality could be incompatible with the judgment from another. We propose a fundamentally new, quantum cognitively motivated fusion strategy for predicting sentiment judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-12T11:06:04Z)
• Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
  This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.