How Alice, long before her time, derived the principles of quantum mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02419v1
• Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2026 13:11:40 GMT
• Title: How Alice, long before her time, derived the principles of quantum mechanics
• Authors: Marcello Poletti,
• Abstract summary: This dialogue explores the idea that the foundational principles of quantum mechanics need not be interpreted as describing a new physics.<n>By pushing this perspective to its extreme, the dialogue argues that the core structures of quantum mechanics can be derived independently of any specifically quantum properties of atomic particles.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This philosophical dialogue explores the idea that the foundational principles of quantum mechanics need not be interpreted as describing a new physics, but may instead arise from the logical necessity of formalising the act of measurement within a coherent algebraic framework. By pushing this perspective to its extreme, the dialogue argues that the core structures of quantum mechanics can be derived independently of any specifically quantum properties of atomic particles, and can be formulated within an otherwise classical theory once limitations of observability and measurement context are taken seriously.

Related papers

• Beyond the Einstein-Bohr Debate: Cognitive Complementarity and the Emergence of Quantum Intuition [0.0]
  Recent high-precision experimental confirmations of quantum complementarity have revitalized foundational debates about measurement, description, and realism.<n>This article argues that complementarity is most productively interpreted as an epistemic principle--constraining what can be simultaneously accessed and represented.<n>We introduce cognitive complementarity as a structural principle governing reasoning under non-classical uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T10:13:29Z)
• A decision-theoretic approach to dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics [39.146761527401424]
  We provide a decision-theoretic framework for dealing with uncertainty in quantum mechanics.<n>We show that measurements play the role of acts with an uncertain outcome.<n>We discuss the mathematical implications of our findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T14:53:06Z)
• Quantum Entanglement Through the Lens of Paraconsistent Logic [0.0]
  This paper presents an alternative approach to quantum entanglement, one that effectively resolves the logical inconsistencies without leading to logical contradictions. By addressing some of the inconsistencies within quantum mechanics, such as state superposition and non-locality, our method is constructed on the principles of paraconsistent logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T17:10:20Z)
• The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach [0.0]
  I argue that quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T00:19:04Z)
• Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Measurement with A New Space-Time Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics [9.116661570248171]
  Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement. We employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:25:08Z)
• The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence [0.0]
  This paper proposes an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence. Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations. A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T19:47:52Z)
• On a foundational conceptual principle of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Anton Zeilinger's "foundational conceptual principle" for quantum mechanics is an idealistic principle, which should be replaced by a realistic principle of contextuality. We argue that the assumption of non-locality is not required to explain quantum correlation. In contrast to Zeilinger's proposed principle of quantization of information, the principle of contextuality explains it realistically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-26T11:24:14Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
  This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.