Doc2AHP: Inferring Structured Multi-Criteria Decision Models via Semantic Trees with LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16479v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 06:20:23 GMT
• Title: Doc2AHP: Inferring Structured Multi-Criteria Decision Models via Semantic Trees with LLMs
• Authors: Hongjia Wu, Shuai Zhou, Hongxin Zhang, Wei Chen,
• Abstract summary: We propose Doc2AHP, a novel structured inference framework guided by AHP principles.<n>We introduce a multi-agent weighting mechanism coupled with an adaptive consistency optimization strategy to ensure the numerical consistency of weight allocation.<n> Empirical results demonstrate that Doc2AHP not only empowers non-expert users to construct high-quality decision models from scratch but also significantly outperforms direct generative baselines in both logical completeness and downstream task accuracy.
• Score: 7.026862437055361
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable proficiency in semantic understanding, they often struggle to ensure structural consistency and reasoning reliability in complex decision-making tasks that demand rigorous logic. Although classical decision theories, such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), offer systematic rational frameworks, their construction relies heavily on labor-intensive domain expertise, creating an "expert bottleneck" that hinders scalability in general scenarios. To bridge the gap between the generalization capabilities of LLMs and the rigor of decision theory, we propose Doc2AHP, a novel structured inference framework guided by AHP principles. Eliminating the need for extensive annotated data or manual intervention, our approach leverages the structural principles of AHP as constraints to direct the LLM in a constrained search within the unstructured document space, thereby enforcing the logical entailment between parent and child nodes. Furthermore, we introduce a multi-agent weighting mechanism coupled with an adaptive consistency optimization strategy to ensure the numerical consistency of weight allocation. Empirical results demonstrate that Doc2AHP not only empowers non-expert users to construct high-quality decision models from scratch but also significantly outperforms direct generative baselines in both logical completeness and downstream task accuracy.

Related papers

• Toward Formalizing LLM-Based Agent Designs through Structural Context Modeling and Semantic Dynamics Analysis [13.919694566467053]
  We argue that this fragmentation stems from the absence of an analyzable, self-consistent formal model that enables characterization and comparison of LLM agents.<n>To address this gap, we propose the texttt Structural Context Model, a formal model for analyzing and comparing LLM agents from the perspective of context structure.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of the complete framework on dynamic variants of the monkey-banana problem, where agents engineered using our approach achieve up to a 32 percentage points improvement in success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T05:15:11Z)
• CogDoc: Towards Unified thinking in Documents [53.41571589733423]
  We propose a unified coarse-to-fine thinking framework that mimics human cognitive processes: a low-resolution "Fast Reading" phase for scalable information localization, followed by a high-resolution "Focused Thinking" phase for deep reasoning.<n>We conduct a rigorous investigation into post-training strategies for the unified thinking framework, demonstrating that a Direct Reinforcement Learning approach outperforms RL with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)<n>Specifically, we find that direct RL avoids the "policy conflict" observed in SFT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T12:14:17Z)
• Deep Unfolding: Recent Developments, Theory, and Design Guidelines [99.63555420898554]
  This article provides a tutorial-style overview of deep unfolding, a framework that transforms optimization algorithms into structured, trainable ML architectures.<n>We review the foundations of optimization for inference and for learning, introduce four representative design paradigms for deep unfolding, and discuss the distinctive training schemes that arise from their iterative nature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T13:16:35Z)
• Structure-R1: Dynamically Leveraging Structural Knowledge in LLM Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning [29.722512436773638]
  We propose textscStructure-R1, a framework that transforms retrieved content into structured representations optimized for reasoning.<n>We show that textscStructure-R1 consistently achieves competitive performance with a 7B-scale backbone model.<n>Our theoretical analysis demonstrates how structured representations enhance reasoning by improving information density and contextual clarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T23:19:28Z)
• Step-Aware Policy Optimization for Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models [57.42778606399764]
  Diffusion language models (dLLMs) offer a promising, non-autoregressive paradigm for text generation.<n>Current reinforcement learning approaches often rely on sparse, outcome-based rewards.<n>We argue that this stems from a fundamental mismatch with the natural structure of reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T00:34:15Z)
• Do LLMs Dream of Discrete Algorithms? [0.7646713951724011]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly transformed the landscape of artificial intelligence.<n>Their reliance on probabilistic inference limits their effectiveness in domains requiring strict logical reasoning.<n>This paper proposes a neurosymbolic approach that augments LLMs with logic-based reasoning modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T22:03:01Z)
• Enhancing Large Language Models through Structured Reasoning [15.472375478049823]
  We introduce a novel approach to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) through explicit structured reasoning.<n>First, we convert unstructured data into structured formats by explicitly annotating reasoning steps.<n>We then employ this structured dataset to train LLMs through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T08:36:12Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning [1.3003982724617653]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet they struggle with inconsistent reasoning. This research introduces Proof of Thought, a framework that enhances the reliability and transparency of LLM outputs. Key contributions include a robust type system with sort management for enhanced logical integrity, explicit representation of rules for clear distinction between factual and inferential knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T18:35:45Z)
• A Principled Framework for Knowledge-enhanced Large Language Model [58.1536118111993]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are versatile, yet they often falter in tasks requiring deep and reliable reasoning. This paper introduces a rigorously designed framework for creating LLMs that effectively anchor knowledge and employ a closed-loop reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T18:10:02Z)
• Guiding the PLMs with Semantic Anchors as Intermediate Supervision: Towards Interpretable Semantic Parsing [57.11806632758607]
  We propose to incorporate the current pretrained language models with a hierarchical decoder network. By taking the first-principle structures as the semantic anchors, we propose two novel intermediate supervision tasks. We conduct intensive experiments on several semantic parsing benchmarks and demonstrate that our approach can consistently outperform the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T07:27:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.