Lex Reformatica: Five Principles of Policy Reform for the Technological Age

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17001v1
• Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:43:57 GMT
• Title: Lex Reformatica: Five Principles of Policy Reform for the Technological Age
• Abstract summary: Twenty-five years ago, Joel Reidenberg argued that technology itself, not just law and regulation, imposes rules on communities in the Information Society.<n>Today we face different challenges requiring us to revisit Reidenberg's insights and examine the consequences of that earlier era.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Twenty-five years ago, Joel Reidenberg argued that technology itself, not just law and regulation, imposes rules on communities in the Information Society. System design choices like network architecture and configurations create regulatory norms he termed "Lex Informatica"-referencing the merchant-driven medieval "Lex Mercatoria" that emerged independent of sovereign control. Today we face different challenges requiring us to revisit Reidenberg's insights and examine the consequences of that earlier era. While Lex Informatica provided a framework for analyzing the internet's birth, we now confront the aftereffects of decades of minimal or absent regulation. Critical questions emerge: When technological social norms develop outside clear legal restraints, who benefits and who suffers? This new era demands infrastructural reform focused on the interplay between public and private regulation and self-regulation, weighing both costs and benefits. Rather than showcasing the promise of yesterday's internet age, today's events reveal the pitfalls of information libertarianism and underscore the urgent need for new approaches to information regulation. This Issue presents articles from two symposiums-one on Lex Informatica and another on race and technology law. Their conversation is now essential. Together, these papers demonstrate what I call the "Lex Reformatica" of today's digital age. This collection shows why scholars, lawyers, and legislators must return to Reidenberg's foundational work and update its trajectory toward a reform-focused approach designed for our current era.

Related papers

• The Metaverse Is Not a Place Apart: Law, Code, and the Recursive Governance of Digital Space (A Review Essay on Mark Findlay, Governing the Metaverse: Law, Order and Freedom in Digital Space (2025)) [0.0]
  essay examines Mark Findlay's Governing the Metaverse: Law, Order and Freedom in Digital Space.<n>Findlay offers an ambitious and timely account of the metaverse as a social and imaginative space.<n> essay argues that the book's two central categories, "the metaverse" and "new law," remain insufficiently theorised.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T17:09:15Z)
• The Disintegration of Free Speech [2.28438857884398]
  This Article examines the constitutional status of AI-mediated communication under the First Amendment.<n>It argues that under existing jurisprudence, AI-generated content is protected speech.<n>The Article concludes that this doctrinal trajectory risks severing the First Amendment from its democratic foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T17:57:58Z)
• Law Proofing the Future [0.09444500584367876]
  Lawmakers today face continuous calls to "future proof" the legal system against emerging technologies.<n>This Article takes a contrarian stance: it is not the law that needs bolstering for the future, but the future that needs protection from the law.<n>The resulting legal regimes entrench incumbents, suppress experimentation, and displace long-standing legal principles with bespoke but brittle rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T14:16:41Z)
• LexGenius: An Expert-Level Benchmark for Large Language Models in Legal General Intelligence [74.05988707492058]
  Legal general intelligence (GI) refers to artificial intelligence (AI) that encompasses legal understanding, reasoning, and decision-making.<n>Existing benchmarks are result-oriented and fail to systematically evaluate the legal intelligence of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose LexGenius, an expert-level Chinese legal benchmark for evaluating legal GI in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T08:48:02Z)
• Lawful but Awful: Evolving Legislative Responses to Address Online Misinformation, Disinformation, and Mal-Information in the Age of Generative AI [0.0]
  This article analyses changing perceptions about the potential harms caused by misinformation, disinformation, and "mal-information"<n>The turn to legislation began in countries that were less free, in terms of civil liberties, and poorer, as measured by GDP per capita.<n>Despite early reservations, growth in such laws is now steepest in Western states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T03:33:13Z)
• Section 230: A Juridical History [0.0]
  Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is the most important law in the history of the internet.<n>The law has not kept pace with the times and is now a source of deep consternation to courts and legislatures.<n>This Article acts as a guidebook to reformers by examining how we got to where we are today.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T15:09:40Z)
• LawPal : A Retrieval Augmented Generation Based System for Enhanced Legal Accessibility in India [0.0]
  Access to legal knowledge in India is often hindered by a lack of awareness, misinformation and limited accessibility to judicial resources.<n>We propose a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based legal chatbots powered by vectorstore oriented FAISS.<n>Our model is trained using an extensive dataset comprising legal books, official documentation and the Indian Constitution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T13:45:47Z)
• Generative AI regulation can learn from social media regulation [0.0]
  I argue that the debates on generative AI regulation can be informed by the debates and evidence on social media regulation.<n>I compare and contrast the affordances of generative AI and social media to highlight their similarities and differences.<n>I discuss specific policy recommendations based on the evolution of social media and their regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-15T23:00:29Z)
• Regulating Large Language Models: A Roundtable Report [0.0]
  The roundtable convened to discuss how law and policy can help address some of the larger societal problems posed by large language models (LLMs) We provide a detailed summary of the day's proceedings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T21:49:17Z)
• SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [42.769107967436945]
  Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data?<n>This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z)
• The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors [58.81546227716182]
  We argue that automating the role of the judge raises difficult ethical challenges, in particular for common law legal systems. Our argument follows from the social role of the judge in actively shaping the law, rather than merely applying it. Even in the case the models could achieve human-level capabilities, there would still be remaining ethical concerns inherent in the automation of the legal process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T13:48:46Z)
• The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
  The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
• Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
  We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields. We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z)
• Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset [46.156169284961045]
  We offer an approach to filtering grounded in law, which has directly addressed the tradeoffs in filtering material. First, we gather and make available the Pile of Law, a 256GB dataset of open-source English-language legal and administrative data. Second, we distill the legal norms that governments have developed to constrain the inclusion of toxic or private content into actionable lessons. Third, we show how the Pile of Law offers researchers the opportunity to learn such filtering rules directly from the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T06:25:15Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.