AMVICC: A Novel Benchmark for Cross-Modal Failure Mode Profiling for VLMs and IGMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17037v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:06:58 GMT
• Title: AMVICC: A Novel Benchmark for Cross-Modal Failure Mode Profiling for VLMs and IGMs
• Authors: Aahana Basappa, Pranay Goel, Anusri Karra, Anish Karra, Asa Gilmore, Kevin Zhu,
• Abstract summary: multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and image generation models (IGMs) were investigated.<n>We created a novel benchmark to compare failure modes across image-to-text and text-to-image tasks.<n>Our results show that failure modes are often shared between models and modalities, but certain failures are model-specific and modality-specific.
• Score: 2.357397994148727
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigated visual reasoning limitations of both multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and image generation models (IGMs) by creating a novel benchmark to systematically compare failure modes across image-to-text and text-to-image tasks, enabling cross-modal evaluation of visual understanding. Despite rapid growth in machine learning, vision language models (VLMs) still fail to understand or generate basic visual concepts such as object orientation, quantity, or spatial relationships, which highlighted gaps in elementary visual reasoning. By adapting MMVP benchmark questions into explicit and implicit prompts, we create \textit{AMVICC}, a novel benchmark for profiling failure modes across various modalities. After testing 11 MLLMs and 3 IGMs in nine categories of visual reasoning, our results show that failure modes are often shared between models and modalities, but certain failures are model-specific and modality-specific, and this can potentially be attributed to various factors. IGMs consistently struggled to manipulate specific visual components in response to prompts, especially in explicit prompts, suggesting poor control over fine-grained visual attributes. Our findings apply most directly to the evaluation of existing state-of-the-art models on structured visual reasoning tasks. This work lays the foundation for future cross-modal alignment studies, offering a framework to probe whether generation and interpretation failures stem from shared limitations to guide future improvements in unified vision-language modeling.

Related papers

• Can Unified Generation and Understanding Models Maintain Semantic Equivalence Across Different Output Modalities? [61.533560295383786]
  Unified Multimodal Large Language Models (U-MLLMs) integrate understanding and generation within a single architecture.<n>We observe that U-MLLMs fail to maintain semantic equivalence when required to render the same results in the image modality.<n>We introduce VGUBench, a framework to decouple reasoning logic from generation fidelity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T06:23:56Z)
• MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery [63.285794947638614]
  We develop MentisOculi, a suite of multi-step reasoning problems amenable to visual solution.<n> evaluating visual strategies ranging from latent tokens to explicit generated imagery, we find they generally fail to improve performance.<n>Our findings suggest that despite their inherent appeal, visual thoughts do not yet benefit model reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T18:49:06Z)
• How Well Do Models Follow Visual Instructions? VIBE: A Systematic Benchmark for Visual Instruction-Driven Image Editing [56.60465182650588]
  We introduce three-level interaction hierarchy that captures deictic grounding, morphological manipulation, and causal reasoning.<n>We propose a robust LMM-as-a-judge evaluation framework with task-specific metrics to enable scalable and fine-grained assessment.<n>We find that proprietary models exhibit early-stage visual instruction-following capabilities and consistently outperform open-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T09:24:45Z)
• More Images, More Problems? A Controlled Analysis of VLM Failure Modes [80.64323947730905]
  Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their proficiency in understanding and reasoning over multiple images remains largely unexplored.<n>We introduce MIMIC, a new benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the multi-image capabilities of LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T18:45:13Z)
• PENDULUM: A Benchmark for Assessing Sycophancy in Multimodal Large Language Models [43.767942065379366]
  Sycophancy is a tendency of AI models to agree with user input at the expense of factual accuracy or in contradiction of visual evidence.<n>We introduce a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, textitPENDULUM, comprising approximately 2,000 human-curated Visual Question Answering pairs.<n>We observe substantial variability in model robustness and a pronounced susceptibility to sycophantic and hallucinatory behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T12:49:12Z)
• Coordinated Robustness Evaluation Framework for Vision-Language Models [4.0196072781228285]
  We train a generic surrogate model that can take both image and text as input and generate joint representation.<n>This coordinated attack strategy is evaluated on the visual question and answering and visual reasoning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T08:09:05Z)
• Text Speaks Louder than Vision: ASCII Art Reveals Textual Biases in Vision-Language Models [93.46875303598577]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced rapidly in processing multimodal information, but their ability to reconcile conflicting signals remains underexplored.<n>This work investigates how VLMs process ASCII art, a unique medium where textual elements collectively form visual patterns, potentially creating semantic-visual conflicts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T10:47:07Z)
• Multimodal Causal Reasoning Benchmark: Challenging Vision Large Language Models to Discern Causal Links Across Modalities [19.923665989164387]
  MuCR is a novel Multimodal Causal Reasoning benchmark that leverages synthetic siamese images and text pairs to challenge MLLMs.<n>Our experiments reveal that current MLLMs fall short in multimodal causal reasoning compared to their performance in purely textual settings.<n>We propose a VcCoT strategy that better highlights visual cues, and our results confirm its efficacy in enhancing multimodal causal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T12:04:32Z)
• Multi-modal Auto-regressive Modeling via Visual Words [96.25078866446053]
  We propose the concept of visual tokens, which maps the visual features to probability distributions over Large Multi-modal Models' vocabulary. We further explore the distribution of visual features in the semantic space within LMM and the possibility of using text embeddings to represent visual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T14:58:52Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks.<n> MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.