How Well Do Models Follow Visual Instructions? VIBE: A Systematic Benchmark for Visual Instruction-Driven Image Editing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01851v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 09:24:45 GMT
• Title: How Well Do Models Follow Visual Instructions? VIBE: A Systematic Benchmark for Visual Instruction-Driven Image Editing
• Authors: Huanyu Zhang, Xuehai Bai, Chengzu Li, Chen Liang, Haochen Tian, Haodong Li, Ruichuan An, Yifan Zhang, Anna Korhonen, Zhang Zhang, Liang Wang, Tieniu Tan,
• Abstract summary: We introduce three-level interaction hierarchy that captures deictic grounding, morphological manipulation, and causal reasoning.<n>We propose a robust LMM-as-a-judge evaluation framework with task-specific metrics to enable scalable and fine-grained assessment.<n>We find that proprietary models exhibit early-stage visual instruction-following capabilities and consistently outperform open-source models.
• Score: 56.60465182650588
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent generative models have achieved remarkable progress in image editing. However, existing systems and benchmarks remain largely text-guided. In contrast, human communication is inherently multimodal, where visual instructions such as sketches efficiently convey spatial and structural intent. To address this gap, we introduce VIBE, the Visual Instruction Benchmark for Image Editing with a three-level interaction hierarchy that captures deictic grounding, morphological manipulation, and causal reasoning. Across these levels, we curate high-quality and diverse test cases that reflect progressively increasing complexity in visual instruction following. We further propose a robust LMM-as-a-judge evaluation framework with task-specific metrics to enable scalable and fine-grained assessment. Through a comprehensive evaluation of 17 representative open-source and proprietary image editing models, we find that proprietary models exhibit early-stage visual instruction-following capabilities and consistently outperform open-source models. However, performance degrades markedly with increasing task difficulty even for the strongest systems, highlighting promising directions for future research.

Related papers

• DeepImageSearch: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Context-Aware Image Retrieval in Visual Histories [52.57197752244638]
  We introduce DeepImageSearch, a novel agentic paradigm that reformulates image retrieval as an autonomous exploration task.<n>Models must plan and perform multi-step reasoning over raw visual histories to locate targets based on implicit contextual cues.<n>We construct DISBench, a challenging benchmark built on interconnected visual data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T12:51:10Z)
• AMVICC: A Novel Benchmark for Cross-Modal Failure Mode Profiling for VLMs and IGMs [2.357397994148727]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and image generation models (IGMs) were investigated.<n>We created a novel benchmark to compare failure modes across image-to-text and text-to-image tasks.<n>Our results show that failure modes are often shared between models and modalities, but certain failures are model-specific and modality-specific.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T00:06:58Z)
• More Images, More Problems? A Controlled Analysis of VLM Failure Modes [80.64323947730905]
  Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their proficiency in understanding and reasoning over multiple images remains largely unexplored.<n>We introduce MIMIC, a new benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the multi-image capabilities of LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T18:45:13Z)
• Image-POSER: Reflective RL for Multi-Expert Image Generation and Editing [16.943575863059607]
  Image-POSER orchestrates a diverse registry of pretrained text-to-image and image-to-image experts.<n>It handles long-form prompts end-to-end through dynamic task decomposition.<n>It is consistently preferred in human evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T03:15:34Z)
• When Visualizing is the First Step to Reasoning: MIRA, a Benchmark for Visual Chain-of-Thought [118.71264263478083]
  We propose MIRA, a new benchmark designed to evaluate models in scenarios where generating intermediate visual images is essential for successful reasoning.<n>We include 546 multimodal problems, annotated with intermediate visual images and final answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T18:00:51Z)
• Factuality Matters: When Image Generation and Editing Meet Structured Visuals [46.627460447235855]
  We construct a large-scale dataset of 1.3 million high-quality structured image pairs.<n>We train a unified model that integrates a VLM with FLUX.1 Kontext.<n>A three-stage training curriculum enables progressive feature alignment, knowledge infusion, and reasoning-augmented generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T17:56:55Z)
• ThinkFake: Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models for AI-Generated Image Detection [51.93101033997245]
  Increasing realism of AI-generated images has raised serious concerns about misinformation and privacy violations.<n>We propose ThinkFake, a novel reasoning-based and generalizable framework for AI-generated image detection.<n>We show that ThinkFake outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the GenImage benchmark and demonstrates strong zero-shot generalization on the challenging LOKI benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T07:34:09Z)
• EdiVal-Agent: An Object-Centric Framework for Automated, Fine-Grained Evaluation of Multi-Turn Editing [170.71134330650796]
  EdiVal-Agent is an object-centric evaluation framework for instruction-based image editing.<n>It is designed to assess not only standard single-turn but also multi-turn instruction-based editing with precision.<n>We build EdiVal-Bench, a benchmark covering 9 instruction types and 13 state-of-the-art editing models spanning in-context, flow-matching, and diffusion paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T17:45:39Z)
• Text-Visual Semantic Constrained AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment [47.575342788480505]
  We propose a unified framework to enhance the comprehensive evaluation of both text-image consistency and perceptual distortion in AI-generated images.<n>Our approach integrates key capabilities from multiple models and tackles the aforementioned challenges by introducing two core modules.<n>Tests conducted on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that SC-AGIQA outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T16:21:05Z)
• InstructCV: Instruction-Tuned Text-to-Image Diffusion Models as Vision Generalists [66.85125112199898]
  We develop a unified language interface for computer vision tasks that abstracts away task-specific design choices. Our model, dubbed InstructCV, performs competitively compared to other generalist and task-specific vision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T14:26:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.