Interpreting Agentic Systems: Beyond Model Explanations to System-Level Accountability
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17168v1
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 21:05:32 GMT
- Title: Interpreting Agentic Systems: Beyond Model Explanations to System-Level Accountability
- Authors: Judy Zhu, Dhari Gandhi, Himanshu Joshi, Ahmad Rezaie Mianroodi, Sedef Akinli Kocak, Dhanesh Ramachandran,
- Abstract summary: Agentic systems have transformed how Large Language Models can be leveraged to create autonomous systems with goal-directed behaviors.<n>Current interpretability techniques, developed primarily for static models, show limitations when applied to agentic systems.<n>This paper assesses the suitability and limitations of existing interpretability methods in the context of agentic systems.
- Score: 0.6745502291821954
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Agentic systems have transformed how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be leveraged to create autonomous systems with goal-directed behaviors, consisting of multi-step planning and the ability to interact with different environments. These systems differ fundamentally from traditional machine learning models, both in architecture and deployment, introducing unique AI safety challenges, including goal misalignment, compounding decision errors, and coordination risks among interacting agents, that necessitate embedding interpretability and explainability by design to ensure traceability and accountability across their autonomous behaviors. Current interpretability techniques, developed primarily for static models, show limitations when applied to agentic systems. The temporal dynamics, compounding decisions, and context-dependent behaviors of agentic systems demand new analytical approaches. This paper assesses the suitability and limitations of existing interpretability methods in the context of agentic systems, identifying gaps in their capacity to provide meaningful insight into agent decision-making. We propose future directions for developing interpretability techniques specifically designed for agentic systems, pinpointing where interpretability is required to embed oversight mechanisms across the agent lifecycle from goal formation, through environmental interaction, to outcome evaluation. These advances are essential to ensure the safe and accountable deployment of agentic AI systems.
Related papers
- Agentic AI for Cybersecurity: A Meta-Cognitive Architecture for Governable Autonomy [0.0]
This paper argues that cybersecurity orchestration should be reconceptualized as an agentic, multi-agent cognitive system.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework in which heterogeneous AI agents responsible for detection, hypothesis formation, contextual interpretation, explanation, and governance are coordinated through an explicit meta-cognitive judgement function.<n>Our contribution is to make this cognitive structure architecturally explicit and governable by embedding meta-cognitive judgement as a first-class system function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T12:52:49Z) - Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z) - Institutional AI: A Governance Framework for Distributional AGI Safety [1.3763052684269788]
We identify three structural problems that emerge from core properties of AI models.<n>The solution is Institutional AI, a system-level approach that treats alignment as a question of effective governance of AI agent collectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T17:08:26Z) - A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypes [7.02443431688472]
Agentic AI marks an important transition from single-step generative models to systems capable of reasoning, planning, acting, and adapting over long-lasting tasks.<n>This survey examines the implications of agentic AI for cybersecurity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T02:46:06Z) - The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities [4.52683540940001]
This chapter examines the emergence of agentic AI systems that operate autonomously in complex environments.<n>We trace the architectural progression from statistical models to transformer-based systems, identifying capabilities that enable agentic behavior.<n>Unlike existing surveys, we focus on the architectural transition from language understanding to autonomous action, emphasizing the technical gaps that must be resolved before deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T06:31:42Z) - Towards Responsible and Explainable AI Agents with Consensus-Driven Reasoning [4.226647687395254]
This paper presents a Responsible(RAI) and Explainable(XAI) AI Agent Architecture for production-grade agentic based on multi-model consensus and reasoning-layer governance.<n>In the proposed design, a consortium of heterogeneous LLM and VLM agents independently generates candidate outputs from a shared input context.<n>A dedicated reasoning agent then performs structured consolidation across these outputs, enforcing safety and policy constraints, mitigating hallucinations and bias, and producing auditable, evidence-backed decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-25T14:49:25Z) - Adaptation of Agentic AI [162.63072848575695]
We unify the rapidly expanding research landscape into a systematic framework that spans both agent adaptations and tool adaptations.<n>We demonstrate that this framework helps clarify the design space of adaptation strategies in agentic AI.<n>We then review the representative approaches in each category, analyze their strengths and limitations, and highlight key open challenges and future opportunities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-18T08:38:51Z) - Fundamentals of Building Autonomous LLM Agents [64.39018305018904]
This paper reviews the architecture and implementation methods of agents powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>The research aims to explore patterns to develop "agentic" LLMs that can automate complex tasks and bridge the performance gap with human capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T10:32:39Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z) - A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: On Path to Artificial Super Intelligence [87.08051686357206]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities but remain fundamentally static.<n>As LLMs are increasingly deployed in open-ended, interactive environments, this static nature has become a critical bottleneck.<n>This survey provides the first systematic and comprehensive review of self-evolving agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T17:59:05Z) - Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.