Towards Responsible and Explainable AI Agents with Consensus-Driven Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21699v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2025 14:49:25 GMT
• Title: Towards Responsible and Explainable AI Agents with Consensus-Driven Reasoning
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a Responsible(RAI) and Explainable(XAI) AI Agent Architecture for production-grade agentic based on multi-model consensus and reasoning-layer governance.<n>In the proposed design, a consortium of heterogeneous LLM and VLM agents independently generates candidate outputs from a shared input context.<n>A dedicated reasoning agent then performs structured consolidation across these outputs, enforcing safety and policy constraints, mitigating hallucinations and bias, and producing auditable, evidence-backed decisions.
• Score: 4.226647687395254
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agentic AI represents a major shift in how autonomous systems reason, plan, and execute multi-step tasks through the coordination of Large Language Models (LLMs), Vision Language Models (VLMs), tools, and external services. While these systems enable powerful new capabilities, increasing autonomy introduces critical challenges related to explainability, accountability, robustness, and governance, especially when agent outputs influence downstream actions or decisions. Existing agentic AI implementations often emphasize functionality and scalability, yet provide limited mechanisms for understanding decision rationale or enforcing responsibility across agent interactions. This paper presents a Responsible(RAI) and Explainable(XAI) AI Agent Architecture for production-grade agentic workflows based on multi-model consensus and reasoning-layer governance. In the proposed design, a consortium of heterogeneous LLM and VLM agents independently generates candidate outputs from a shared input context, explicitly exposing uncertainty, disagreement, and alternative interpretations. A dedicated reasoning agent then performs structured consolidation across these outputs, enforcing safety and policy constraints, mitigating hallucinations and bias, and producing auditable, evidence-backed decisions. Explainability is achieved through explicit cross-model comparison and preserved intermediate outputs, while responsibility is enforced through centralized reasoning-layer control and agent-level constraints. We evaluate the architecture across multiple real-world agentic AI workflows, demonstrating that consensus-driven reasoning improves robustness, transparency, and operational trust across diverse application domains. This work provides practical guidance for designing agentic AI systems that are autonomous and scalable, yet responsible and explainable by construction.

Related papers

• Explaining AI Agents Through Execution Traces [1.8862116040247214]
  We present a post-hoc XAI framework that transforms a lengthy agent's execution trace into a structured report and a faithful natural-language explanation.<n>Because it relies solely on execution traces, the framework applies across different agent architectures, environments, and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T12:45:56Z)
• Separating Capability from Permission: A Governance Framework for Agentic AI Autonomy Levels [15.361996125107979]
  This paper introduces a governance framework that separates Allowed Autonomy Levels (AAL) and Autonomous Capability Levels (ACL)<n>AAL defines the degree of autonomy an AI agent is authorized to exercise given risk, oversight, and accountability considerations.<n>We present a structured set of autonomy levels spanning reactive execution, decision support, supervised action, goal-directed autonomy, and delegated operational authority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-26T03:32:13Z)
• Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
  Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z)
• Position: agentic AI orchestration should be Bayes-consistent [92.04373485710285]
  This paper argues that coherent decision-making requires Bayesian principles at the orchestration level of the agentic system.<n>It provides examples and design patterns to illustrate how beliefs and utility-aware policies can improve agentic AI orchestration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T15:43:43Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• From Prompt-Response to Goal-Directed Systems: The Evolution of Agentic AI Software Architecture [0.0]
  Agentic AI denotes an architectural transition from stateless, prompt-driven generative models toward goal-directed systems.<n>This paper examines this transition by connecting intelligent agent theories, with contemporary LLM-centric approaches.<n>The study identifies a convergence toward standardized agent loops, registries, and auditable control mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T03:34:48Z)
• Interpreting Agentic Systems: Beyond Model Explanations to System-Level Accountability [0.6745502291821954]
  Agentic systems have transformed how Large Language Models can be leveraged to create autonomous systems with goal-directed behaviors.<n>Current interpretability techniques, developed primarily for static models, show limitations when applied to agentic systems.<n>This paper assesses the suitability and limitations of existing interpretability methods in the context of agentic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T21:05:32Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities [4.52683540940001]
  This chapter examines the emergence of agentic AI systems that operate autonomously in complex environments.<n>We trace the architectural progression from statistical models to transformer-based systems, identifying capabilities that enable agentic behavior.<n>Unlike existing surveys, we focus on the architectural transition from language understanding to autonomous action, emphasizing the technical gaps that must be resolved before deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T06:31:42Z)
• Assured Autonomy: How Operations Research Powers and Orchestrates Generative AI Systems [18.881800772626427]
  We argue generative models can be fragile in operational domains unless paired with mechanisms that provide feasibility, robustness to distribution shift, and stress testing.<n>We develop a conceptual framework for assured autonomy grounded in operations research.<n>These elements define a research agenda for assured autonomy in safety-critical, reliability-sensitive operational domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T04:24:06Z)
• Adaptation of Agentic AI [162.63072848575695]
  We unify the rapidly expanding research landscape into a systematic framework that spans both agent adaptations and tool adaptations.<n>We demonstrate that this framework helps clarify the design space of adaptation strategies in agentic AI.<n>We then review the representative approaches in each category, analyze their strengths and limitations, and highlight key open challenges and future opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T08:38:51Z)
• Fundamentals of Building Autonomous LLM Agents [64.39018305018904]
  This paper reviews the architecture and implementation methods of agents powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>The research aims to explore patterns to develop "agentic" LLMs that can automate complex tasks and bridge the performance gap with human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T10:32:39Z)
• TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems [8.683314804719506]
  This review presents a structured analysis of Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM) in the context of Agentic Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS)<n>We begin by examining the conceptual foundations of Agentic AI and highlight its architectural distinctions from traditional AI agents.<n>We then adapt and extend the AI TRiSM framework for Agentic AI, structured around key pillars: textit Explainability, ModelOps, Security, Privacy and textittheir lifecycle governance<n>A risk taxonomy is proposed to capture the unique threats and vulnerabilities of Agentic AI, ranging from coordination failures to
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T16:26:11Z)
• Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers [89.26889709510242]
  We argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently.<n>We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction.<n>This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T07:52:16Z)
• Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
  We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• Governing AI Agents [0.2913760942403036]
  Article looks at the economic theory of principal-agent problems and the common law doctrine of agency relationships.<n>It identifies problems arising from AI agents, including issues of information asymmetry, discretionary authority, and loyalty.<n>It argues that new technical and legal infrastructure is needed to support governance principles of inclusivity, visibility, and liability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T07:55:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.