Multi-Agent Learning Path Planning via LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17346v1
• Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 07:13:08 GMT
• Title: Multi-Agent Learning Path Planning via LLMs
• Authors: Haoxin Xu, Changyong Qi, Tong Liu, Bohao Zhang, Anna He, Bingqian Jiang, Longwei Zheng, Xiaoqing Gu,
• Abstract summary: This study proposes a novel Multi-Agent Learning Path Planning framework powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>The framework includes three task-specific agents: a learner analytics agent, a path planning agent, and a reflection agent.<n> Experiments conducted on the MOOCX dataset using seven LLMs show that MALPP significantly outperforms baseline models in path quality, knowledge sequence consistency, and cognitive load alignment.
• Score: 10.288666777827578
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The integration of large language models (LLMs) into intelligent tutoring systems offers transformative potential for personalized learning in higher education. However, most existing learning path planning approaches lack transparency, adaptability, and learner-centered explainability. To address these challenges, this study proposes a novel Multi-Agent Learning Path Planning (MALPP) framework that leverages a role- and rule-based collaboration mechanism among intelligent agents, each powered by LLMs. The framework includes three task-specific agents: a learner analytics agent, a path planning agent, and a reflection agent. These agents collaborate via structured prompts and predefined rules to analyze learning profiles, generate tailored learning paths, and iteratively refine them with interpretable feedback. Grounded in Cognitive Load Theory and Zone of Proximal Development, the system ensures that recommended paths are cognitively aligned and pedagogically meaningful. Experiments conducted on the MOOCCubeX dataset using seven LLMs show that MALPP significantly outperforms baseline models in path quality, knowledge sequence consistency, and cognitive load alignment. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of the collaborative mechanism and theoretical constraints. This research contributes to the development of trustworthy, explainable AI in education and demonstrates a scalable approach to learner-centered adaptive instruction powered by LLMs.

Related papers

• A Theory of Adaptive Scaffolding for LLM-Based Pedagogical Agents [3.6084561124905297]
  Large language models (LLMs) present new opportunities for creating pedagogical agents that engage in meaningful dialogue to support student learning.<n>We propose a framework that combines Evidence-Centered Design with Social Cognitive Theory for adaptive scaffolding in LLM-based agents focused on STEM+C learning.<n>Our findings show that Inquizzitor delivers high-quality assessment and interaction aligned with core learning theories, offering teachers effective guidance that students value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T21:58:32Z)
• Improving LLM Agent Planning with In-Context Learning via Atomic Fact Augmentation and Lookahead Search [48.348209577994865]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly capable but often require significant guidance or extensive interaction history to perform effectively in complex, interactive environments.<n>We introduce a novel LLM agent framework that enhances planning capabilities through in-context learning.<n>Our agent learns to extract task-critical atomic facts'' from its interaction trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T18:36:31Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.817538122688944]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors from Reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Empirical results from single-turn experiments demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• ALPINE: Unveiling the Planning Capability of Autoregressive Learning in Language Models [48.559185522099625]
  Planning is a crucial element of both human intelligence and contemporary large language models (LLMs) This paper investigates the emergence of planning capabilities in Transformer-based LLMs via their next-word prediction mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T09:59:37Z)
• Towards Modeling Learner Performance with Large Language Models [7.002923425715133]
  This paper investigates whether the pattern recognition and sequence modeling capabilities of LLMs can be extended to the domain of knowledge tracing. We compare two approaches to using LLMs for this task, zero-shot prompting and model fine-tuning, with existing, non-LLM approaches to knowledge tracing. While LLM-based approaches do not achieve state-of-the-art performance, fine-tuned LLMs surpass the performance of naive baseline models and perform on par with standard Bayesian Knowledge Tracing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T14:06:34Z)
• Solution-oriented Agent-based Models Generation with Verifier-assisted Iterative In-context Learning [10.67134969207797]
  Agent-based models (ABMs) stand as an essential paradigm for proposing and validating hypothetical solutions or policies. Large language models (LLMs) encapsulating cross-domain knowledge and programming proficiency could potentially alleviate the difficulty of this process. We present SAGE, a general solution-oriented ABM generation framework designed for automatic modeling and generating solutions for targeted problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T07:59:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.