UniCog: Uncovering Cognitive Abilities of LLMs through Latent Mind Space Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17897v1
• Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 16:19:00 GMT
• Title: UniCog: Uncovering Cognitive Abilities of LLMs through Latent Mind Space Analysis
• Authors: Jiayu Liu, Yinhe Long, Zhenya Huang, Enhong Chen,
• Abstract summary: A growing body of research suggests that the cognitive processes of large language models (LLMs) differ fundamentally from those of humans.<n>We propose UniCog, a unified framework that analyzes LLM cognition via a latent mind space.
• Score: 69.50752734049985
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A growing body of research suggests that the cognitive processes of large language models (LLMs) differ fundamentally from those of humans. However, existing interpretability methods remain limited in explaining how cognitive abilities are engaged during LLM reasoning. In this paper, we propose UniCog, a unified framework that analyzes LLM cognition via a latent mind space. Formulated as a latent variable model, UniCog encodes diverse abilities from dense model activations into sparse, disentangled latent dimensions. Through extensive analysis on six advanced LLMs, including DeepSeek-V3.2 and GPT-4o, we reveal a Pareto principle of LLM cognition, where a shared reasoning core is complemented by ability-specific signatures. Furthermore, we discover that reasoning failures often manifest as anomalous intensity in latent activations. These findings opens a new paradigm in LLM analysis, providing a cognition grounded view of reasoning dynamics. Finally, leveraging these insights, we introduce a latent-informed candidate prioritization strategy, which improves reasoning performance by up to 7.5% across challenging benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/milksalute/unicog.

Related papers

• The Erosion of LLM Signatures: Can We Still Distinguish Human and LLM-Generated Scientific Ideas After Iterative Paraphrasing? [0.7162422068114824]
  We evaluate the ability of state-of-the-art (SOTA) machine learning models to differentiate between human and LLM-generated ideas.<n>Our findings highlight the challenges SOTA models face in source attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T23:22:21Z)
• Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs [63.12951576410617]
  Large language models (LLMs) solve complex problems yet fail on simpler variants, suggesting they achieve correct outputs through mechanisms fundamentally different from human reasoning.<n>We synthesize cognitive science research into a taxonomy of 28 cognitive elements spanning reasoning invariants, meta-cognitive controls, representations for organizing reasoning & knowledge, and transformation operations.<n>We develop test-time reasoning guidance that automatically scaffold successful structures, improving performance by up to 66.7% on complex problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T18:59:00Z)
• MM-OPERA: Benchmarking Open-ended Association Reasoning for Large Vision-Language Models [15.929002709503921]
  We aim to evaluate a fundamental yet underexplored intelligence: association.<n> MM-OPERA is a systematic benchmark with 11,497 instances across two open-ended tasks.<n>It challenges LVLMs to resemble the spirit of divergent thinking and convergent associative reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T18:49:06Z)
• Truly Assessing Fluid Intelligence of Large Language Models through Dynamic Reasoning Evaluation [106.17986469245302]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capacities that mirror human-like thinking.<n>Existing reasoning benchmarks either focus on domain-specific knowledge (crystallized intelligence) or lack interpretability.<n>We propose DRE-Bench, a dynamic reasoning evaluation benchmark grounded in a hierarchical cognitive framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:01:08Z)
• Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z)
• Large Language Models Think Too Fast To Explore Effectively [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged with many intellectual capacities.<n>This study investigates whether LLMs can surpass humans in exploration during an open-ended task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T21:51:17Z)
• Can large language models understand uncommon meanings of common words? [30.527834781076546]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant advancements across diverse natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. Yet, lacking widely acknowledged testing mechanisms, answering whether LLMs are parrots or genuinely comprehend the world' remains unclear. This paper presents innovative construction of a Lexical Semantic dataset with novel evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:58:22Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with Local Intrinsic Dimension [63.330262740414646]
  We study how to characterize and predict the truthfulness of texts generated from large language models (LLMs) We suggest investigating internal activations and quantifying LLM's truthfulness using the local intrinsic dimension (LID) of model activations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T04:56:21Z)
• MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluation [60.65820977963331]
  We introduce a novel evaluation paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs) This paradigm shifts the emphasis from result-oriented assessments, which often neglect the reasoning process, to a more comprehensive evaluation. By applying this paradigm in the GSM8K dataset, we have developed the MR-GSM8K benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T15:49:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.