Spatial-Conditioned Reasoning in Long-Egocentric Videos

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18100v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 03:21:35 GMT
• Title: Spatial-Conditioned Reasoning in Long-Egocentric Videos
• Abstract summary: Long-horizon egocentric video presents significant challenges for visual navigation due to viewpoint drift and the absence of persistent geometric context.<n>We study how explicit spatial signals influence VLM-based video understanding without modifying model architectures or inference procedures.
• Score: 17.314383569244303
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Long-horizon egocentric video presents significant challenges for visual navigation due to viewpoint drift and the absence of persistent geometric context. Although recent vision-language models perform well on image and short-video reasoning, their spatial reasoning capability in long egocentric sequences remains limited. In this work, we study how explicit spatial signals influence VLM-based video understanding without modifying model architectures or inference procedures. We introduce Sanpo-D, a fine-grained re-annotation of the Google Sanpo dataset, and benchmark multiple VLMs on navigation-oriented spatial queries. To examine input-level inductive bias, we further fuse depth maps with RGB frames and evaluate their impact on spatial reasoning. Our results reveal a trade-off between general-purpose accuracy and spatial specialization, showing that depth-aware and spatially grounded representations can improve performance on safety-critical tasks such as pedestrian and obstruction detection.

Related papers

• ConsiSpace: Learning Geometric Consistency Matters for Video Spatial Reasoning [22.393717134409012]
  ConsiSpace is a geometry-consistency-aware framework for geometry-sensitive video spatial reasoning.<n>We build a geometry-consistent memory (GCM) including implicit evidence tokens and explicit geometric cues.<n>We utilize unified self-supervised reinforcement learning (UCSSRL) to improve cross-view stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T06:40:45Z)
• SpaceEra++: A Unified Framework Towards 3D Spatial Reasoning in Video [88.79625979053873]
  We propose a novel framework, SpaceEra, for pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs)<n>We extend the original framework into a comprehensive system, termed SpaceEra++, which spans data construction, model design, training optimization, and prompting inference.<n>In addition, to enhance spatial reasoning, we develop SpaceAlign, which enforces pairwise object constraints by jointly exploiting absolute coordinates and relative spatial relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T06:56:29Z)
• From Indoor to Open World: Revealing the Spatial Reasoning Gap in MLLMs [65.04549036809557]
  We introduce a benchmark built from pedestrian-perspective videos captured with synchronized stereo cameras, LiDAR, and IMU/GPS sensors.<n>This dataset provides metrically precise 3D information, enabling the automatic generation of spatial reasoning questions.<n> Evaluations reveal that the performance gains observed in structured indoor benchmarks vanish in open-world settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T18:58:12Z)
• Reasoning Path and Latent State Analysis for Multi-view Visual Spatial Reasoning: A Cognitive Science Perspective [17.592210658831902]
  spatial reasoning is a core aspect of human intelligence that allows perception, inference and planning in 3D environments.<n>Current vision-language models (VLMs) struggle to maintain geometric coherence and cross-view consistency for spatial reasoning in multi-view settings.<n>We present ReMindView-Bench, a cognitively grounded benchmark for evaluating how VLMs construct, align and maintain spatial mental models across complementary viewpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T02:21:29Z)
• REM: Evaluating LLM Embodied Spatial Reasoning through Multi-Frame Trajectories [19.741468026765062]
  We introduce REM (Reasoning over Embodied Multi-Frame Trajectories), a benchmark using controllable 3D environments for embodied spatial reasoning.<n> REM systematically evaluates key aspects like object permanence/distinction, spatial relationships, and numerical tracking across dynamic embodied viewpoints.<n>Our evaluation shows that the best-performing current models exhibit promising overall performance, but become increasingly unreliable at even moderate complexity levels easily handled by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T05:20:22Z)
• Video Spatial Reasoning with Object-Centric 3D Rollout [58.12446467377404]
  We propose Object-Centric 3D Rollout (OCR) to enable robust video spatial reasoning.<n>OCR introduces structured perturbations to the 3D geometry of selected objects during training.<n>OCR compels the model to reason holistically across the entire scene.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T09:53:41Z)
• Multimodal Spatial Reasoning in the Large Model Era: A Survey and Benchmarks [108.15756345836901]
  We provide a comprehensive review of multimodal spatial reasoning tasks with large models.<n>We review advances in embodied AI, including vision-language navigation and action models.<n>We consider emerging modalities such as audio and egocentric video, which contribute to novel spatial understanding through new sensors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T17:55:43Z)
• ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models [68.46716645478661]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual content.<n>Current VLMs excel primarily at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective) but fail to generalize to allocentric viewpoints.<n>We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for multi-viewpoint spatial localization recognition evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:59:26Z)
• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning.<n>We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• Beyond Semantics: Rediscovering Spatial Awareness in Vision-Language Models [13.768090541138571]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) excel at identifying and describing objects but often fail at spatial reasoning.<n>Our analysis reveals a key imbalance: vision token embeddings have much larger norms than text tokens.<n>Tools uncover that vision tokens and system prompts dominate attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:51:14Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [69.56484419619919]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability.<n>We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• Occupancy Anticipation for Efficient Exploration and Navigation [97.17517060585875]
  We propose occupancy anticipation, where the agent uses its egocentric RGB-D observations to infer the occupancy state beyond the visible regions. By exploiting context in both the egocentric views and top-down maps our model successfully anticipates a broader map of the environment. Our approach is the winning entry in the 2020 Habitat PointNav Challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T03:16:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.